Blind Men And An Elephant Book Quiz! Trivia

The story takes place in India.

The question is asking for the number of blind men. The given answer is 6, which means there were 6 blind men.

The blind men started to argue because each one believed that his idea about the elephant was the correct one. Since they were unable to see the elephant, they relied on their own limited perception and experience to form their opinions. This led to a disagreement as each blind man had a different interpretation of the elephant based on the specific part they touched.

The second blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched one of its tusks because he knew a spear was long, smooth, and the tip was pointed and sharp. This suggests that he compared the characteristics of the tusk to those of a spear, allowing him to make an educated guess about the nature of the elephant.

An inference is a logical guess that you make using your background knowledge and previous experiences. This means that when you read a text, you use the information provided and combine it with what you already know to make an educated guess about something that is not explicitly stated. Inferences are important for understanding the deeper meaning and implications of a text, as they require critical thinking and analysis.

One of the elephant's tusk is long and smooth because tusks are elongated, ivory-like teeth that grow out of an elephant's mouth. They are known for their smooth texture and can grow to be quite long, making them a suitable answer for the given question.

The fourth blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched one of its legs because he knew that trees were thick, rough, and very tall. Since he felt these characteristics while touching the leg, he associated it with a tree rather than an elephant.

The sixth blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched its tail because he knew that ropes were long, thick, and had hair on the end. This suggests that he mistook the tail for a rope due to its similar characteristics.

This story is a fable because fables are short fictional stories that often feature animals as characters and convey a moral lesson or message. Fables typically use animals to represent human qualities or behaviors, and the story usually ends with a moral or lesson that the reader can learn from.

The fifth blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched one of its ears because he knew that fans flapped and made a breeze. This suggests that he associated the movement and sensation he felt with the concept of a fan, which typically produces a breeze when it flaps. By drawing this connection, he inferred that the object he touched was similar to a fan in some way, leading him to conclude that it was an elephant.

The author means that each person had a partial understanding of what the elephant was, but none of them had the complete picture. They were all right in their own limited perspective, but wrong in thinking that their perspective was the only truth. The elephant was not just one thing, such as a spear, rope, or wall, but a combination of all these things.

The correct answer is "Its legs." Elephants have thick and rough skin on their legs, which helps protect them from the environment and potential threats. The skin on their legs is thicker compared to other parts of their body, providing them with extra support and stability. Additionally, the rough texture of their skin helps to prevent slipping and sliding on different terrains.

The third blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched its trunk because he knew that a snake could move up and down side to side. This suggests that he associated the movement of the trunk with that of a snake, possibly due to similarities in their flexibility and motion.

The first blind man made an inference about the elephant when he touched its side because he knew that walls are wide and flat. Since he couldn't see the elephant, he used his prior knowledge about walls to make an assumption about the object he was touching. He associated the wide and flat shape with walls, leading him to infer that the object he was touching was similar to a wall.