Should Children Be Allowed To Watch Harry Potter 7?

Each author has 3 main points in their series of arguments.

Each author is trying to persuade or convince the audience to agree with their point of view or argument. They aim to present their ideas or opinions in a way that resonates with the audience and convinces them to adopt the same perspective. The authors use various rhetorical devices, evidence, and persuasive techniques to sway the audience's opinion and gain their agreement.

The teacher most wants the students to learn how to write an argument. This is evident from the fact that the text is about convincing parents to let you go to the Harry Potter movie, which requires constructing a persuasive argument. The other options, such as convincing parents not to let you see the movie or learning how to convince parents, are not mentioned in the text and are therefore not the main focus of what the teacher wants the students to learn.

Mr. Snape believes that the movie is not meant for children because he thinks the author wrote the story specifically for older readers. This suggests that the content and themes of the story may be too complex or mature for young children to fully understand or appreciate.

This article is made from expositions or arguments because it presents information or ideas in a logical and persuasive manner. It is likely to provide evidence, examples, and reasoning to support a particular viewpoint or claim.

Each article is structured with an introduction, followed by a series of arguments, and concludes with a conclusion. This structure allows the author to present their main points and supporting evidence in a logical and organized manner, leading the reader through the article from start to finish. The introduction sets the stage and provides background information, the series of arguments presents different perspectives or evidence to support the main idea, and the conclusion summarizes the key points and often offers a final thought or recommendation.

Mr. Black thinks it's unfair for children not to be allowed to see the final Harry Potter movie because they won't know how it ends. This implies that Mr. Black believes that knowing the ending is an important part of the movie experience, and by not allowing children to see it, they are being deprived of this crucial aspect.

The REAL author wrote both of these articles to show examples of how to write an argument. This can be inferred from the fact that the question mentions that the "authors" are make-believe, indicating that the articles are fictional. Therefore, the purpose of the real author would be to provide examples for educational purposes, specifically to demonstrate how to write an argument.

Mr. Black believes that movies are harmless because when the movie is over, everyone in the audience is still alive. This suggests that Mr. Black's definition of harm is physical harm or danger. He believes that movies do not pose any physical threats or risks to the audience members. This explanation implies that Mr. Black does not consider other potential harmful effects of movies, such as psychological or emotional impact.

Mr. Black proved to the audience that children know the difference between movies and real-life by stating that he knew that lions couldn't talk. This suggests that he understood that the events portrayed in movies are not reflective of reality, and children are aware of this distinction. By highlighting this fact, he demonstrated that children have the ability to differentiate between fictional elements in movies and real-life situations.