Loftus And Palmer 1974 Experiment Quiz

Loftus and Palmer were conducting a study to examine the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. They were not testing how well people can see cars or how well people can drive. The study focused on the impact of leading questions on memory recall, demonstrating that the wording of a question can influence a person's memory of an event. This research highlighted the fallibility of eyewitness testimony and raised concerns about its reliability in legal cases.

Loftus and Palmer used a lab experiment. Lab experiments are conducted in a controlled environment, allowing researchers to manipulate variables and measure the effects. In this case, Loftus and Palmer conducted their study in a controlled laboratory setting, where they manipulated the wording of a question to investigate the impact on participants' memory of a car accident. This type of experiment is advantageous as it allows for precise control over variables and enables researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships.

The statement indicates that there was broken glass in the film during experiment two. However, the correct answer is false, which means that there was no broken glass in the film during experiment two.

The given statement suggests that one of the conclusions drawn was related to response bias. This means that the conclusion indicates that the responses given by individuals may have been influenced by bias, such as social desirability bias or confirmation bias. Therefore, the statement is true as it confirms the existence of a conclusion regarding response bias.

The statement "The study was high in ecological validity" is false. Ecological validity refers to the extent to which the findings of a study can be generalized to real-world settings. If the study had high ecological validity, it would mean that the conditions and variables in the study closely resemble those in real life. However, since the answer is false, it suggests that the study was not high in ecological validity, meaning that the findings may not be applicable or generalizable to real-world situations.

The correct answer is 45. This means that 45 students took part in experiment one.

The statement "In experiment two, seven people said 'yes' in the hit condition" indicates that there were indeed seven individuals who responded affirmatively in the hit condition during experiment two. Therefore, the answer is true.

In experiment two, 34 people said "no" in the smashed condition.

The results of the control condition in experiment two were 6 participants answering "yes" and 44 participants answering "no".

In the given question, the term "iv" is mentioned. The correct answer states that the "iv" in experiment one was the verb used. This suggests that in experiment one, the independent variable (iv) was the verb used. The independent variable is the factor that is manipulated or changed by the researcher in an experiment. In this case, the verb used was the variable that was being manipulated to observe its effect on the experiment.