Can You Recognize Plagiarism?

Photos, graphics, charts, tables, and statistics all need to be cited because they are considered as visual or numerical representations of information that is not originally created by the author. Citing these sources is important in order to give credit to the original creators and to provide readers with the ability to locate the sources for further information or verification. This helps to maintain academic integrity and avoid plagiarism. Therefore, it is true that these visual and numerical elements should be cited when used in a document or research.

This statement is false because citing sources is not only necessary in written papers, but it is also important in any form of academic or scholarly work. Citing sources helps to acknowledge and give credit to the original authors or researchers, and it also allows readers to verify the information and build upon previous knowledge. Properly citing sources is a fundamental aspect of academic integrity and ethical research practices.

This statement is false because plagiarism is a serious offense that can lead to severe consequences, including expulsion from school. Failing the assignment is just one possible punishment for plagiarism, but it does not mean that expulsion is not an option. Plagiarism undermines academic integrity and is generally taken very seriously by educational institutions.

In academic writing, it is important to give credit to the original author whenever their ideas or work are used. This helps to avoid plagiarism and shows respect for the author's intellectual property. By citing the author throughout the paper, the writer acknowledges the source of the ideas and provides evidence for their own arguments. This also allows readers to trace back the information to its original source and verify its accuracy. Therefore, the statement "I need to keep citing the author throughout my paper whenever I use his or her ideas" is true.

It is not OK for someone to rewrite a part of your paper without your permission, even if their intention is to make it sound better. This is considered plagiarism and violates academic integrity. It is important to give credit to the original author and properly cite any sources used in the paper.

Common knowledge refers to information that is widely known and accepted by the general public. In the case of George Washington being the first US president, this fact is well-established and can be found in history textbooks, encyclopedias, and other reliable sources. Since it is widely known and accepted, there is no need to provide a citation for this information. Therefore, the statement that common knowledge like George Washington being the first US president does not need to be cited is true.

Handing in a paper originally done for a different class is not okay, even if the person wrote it themselves. This is because each class has its specific requirements and objectives, and using a paper from a different class may not meet those requirements or fulfill the intended learning outcomes. Additionally, submitting work that is not original to the current class is considered a form of academic dishonesty, as it does not demonstrate the student's understanding or engagement with the material being taught in the current class.

The statement "If I reword the original text into my own words, I don’t need to cite the author" is incorrect. When rewording the original text into one's own words, it is still necessary to cite the author because the ideas or information originated from the author's work. Failure to do so would be considered plagiarism.

Proverbs such as "Look before you Leap" do not need to be cited. Proverbs are considered common knowledge and are widely known and used by many people. Therefore, they do not require a citation as they are part of the cultural and linguistic heritage.