English IV Quiz On Be Allowed To Vs Let And 3rd Conditional

The correct answer explains the hypothetical outcome of the situation. It suggests that if she had gone to art school, the result would have been that she would have become an artist. This answer follows the structure of the third conditional, which is used to talk about unreal or hypothetical situations in the past and their possible outcomes.

The correct answer explains the consequence of not going to the party. It states that if he hadn't gone to the party, he wouldn't have met his wife. This sentence is an example of the third conditional, which is used to talk about hypothetical past situations and their consequences. It suggests that because he went to the party, he had the opportunity to meet his wife. However, if he hadn't gone, he would have missed that chance and never met her.

The correct answer is a rephrased version of the given sentence in the 3rd conditional form. It implies that if the person had enough money, they would have chosen to take a taxi. This answer reflects the hypothetical situation and uses the correct verb forms to express the past unreal condition and its potential outcome.

The answer correctly uses the third conditional to speculate about a hypothetical situation. It states that if the person had been born in a different country, they would have learned to speak a different language. This is because language acquisition is influenced by the environment and culture of the country one is born in. Therefore, being born in a different country would have likely resulted in learning a different language.

John's parents "let" him have an expensive and comfortable holiday. This means that they gave him permission or allowed him to have the holiday.

The correct answer is "lets". This means that the hotel management allows or permits us to use the mini bar in our room.

The verb "let" is commonly used in active sentences when a person or figure of authority grants permission to do something. It implies that someone is giving consent or allowing someone else to do a specific action.

This answer is correct because the expression "be allowed to" is commonly used in passive sentences to indicate that someone has received permission to do something. It implies that someone else has given the person permission to take a specific action. The word "let" can also be used in this context, but "be allowed to" is more commonly used.

The correct answer is "don't let." This is because the sentence is in the present tense and refers to a habitual action. When we talk about a habitual action, we use the base form of the verb "let" without the auxiliary verb "do." Therefore, "don't let" is the correct option to complete the sentence.

The correct answer is "is allowed to" because it indicates that nobody has permission or authorization to smoke at the gas station. The phrase "is allowed to" implies that there is a rule or policy in place that prohibits smoking at the gas station. The other option "lets" suggests that someone is giving permission to smoke, which contradicts the idea of nobody being allowed to smoke.

The correct answer is "am not allowed to." This option indicates that the speaker is not given permission or authorization to go out in the evenings. It implies that there are restrictions or rules in place that prevent the speaker from going out during that time.

Passengers are not allowed to use electronically operated devices on the plane. This means that passengers are prohibited or not permitted to use such devices during the flight.

The correct answer is "are not allowed to" because it indicates that holidaymakers are prohibited from interfering with the timetable arranged by the tour guide. This suggests that there are rules or restrictions in place that prevent holidaymakers from disrupting or changing the planned schedule. The phrase "are not allowed to" implies that there is a restriction or prohibition in place, which aligns with the idea that holidaymakers cannot interfere with the tour guide's timetable.

Pets are not allowed in the classrooms.

The correct answer is "are not allowed to." This is because the sentence is referring to a restriction or prohibition on students using their calculators during exams. The phrase "are not allowed to" indicates that students are prohibited from using their calculators, while the other option "don't let" does not convey the same meaning of a restriction.

The correct answer, "doesn't let," suggests that Jim does not allow or permit Jeffrey to talk badly about him. This implies that Jim takes action to prevent Jeffrey from speaking negatively about him.

In the third conditional, the "condition clause" refers to the hypothetical situation that did not happen. The past perfect tense is used in the "condition clause" to indicate an action that would have occurred before the hypothetical situation. This tense is used to express the idea of an unreal past event and is formed by using "had" followed by the past participle of the verb.

The function of third conditional sentences is to express situations that did not happen in the past and to express regrets or criticism about those situations.

In the "result clause" of the third conditional, the tense that needs to be used is the perfect modal. This is because the third conditional is used to talk about hypothetical situations in the past and their imagined results. The perfect modal tense combines the past tense with a modal verb, such as "would have," to express the imagined result of the hypothetical situation.

The correct answer is a sentence that correctly uses the third conditional to express a hypothetical situation. It states that if the speaker and their friends had been invited to the party, they would have gone. This answer accurately reflects the meaning of the given situation and uses the correct verb tenses to express the hypothetical outcome.