I First Internal Examination - Professional Communication
1. This is a timed test. The test would be for an hour and you would get a buffer time of 10 minutes.
2. There are a total of 50 questions. All questions are compulsory.
3. Each question carries one mark.
- 1.
Candle: Wick :: ?
- A.
Hammer : Nail
- B.
Oven : Fire
- C.
Bicycle : Wheel
- D.
Pride : Grief
Correct Answer
C. Bicycle : WheelExplanation
The relationship between a candle and a wick is that the wick is an essential component of the candle, as it is the part that is lit and burns to produce light. Similarly, in the relationship between a bicycle and a wheel, the wheel is an essential component of the bicycle, as it enables the bicycle to move and function properly.Rate this question:
-
- 2.
Cyclone: Devastation :: Seaquake : ?
- A.
Shore
- B.
Elegance
- C.
Corrosion
- D.
Huge Waves
Correct Answer
C. CorrosionExplanation
A cyclone causes devastation by bringing strong winds and heavy rainfall, resulting in destruction and damage to buildings, infrastructure, and vegetation. Similarly, a seaquake refers to an earthquake that occurs under the sea, causing underwater disturbances and potentially leading to corrosion. Corrosion is the process of gradual deterioration or decay of materials, especially metals, due to chemical reactions with the environment. Just like a cyclone causes devastation, a seaquake can cause corrosion by disturbing the seabed and exposing underwater structures to corrosive elements such as saltwater.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
Monotony : Variety :: Crudeness:?
- A.
Refinement
- B.
Raw
- C.
Sobriety
- D.
Simplicity
Correct Answer
A. RefinementExplanation
The relationship between "monotony" and "variety" is that monotony is the absence of variety. Similarly, the relationship between "crudeness" and "refinement" is that crudeness is the absence of refinement. Therefore, the correct answer is "Refinement".Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Numismatist : Coins :: ?
- A.
Jeweller : Jewellery
- B.
Geneticist : Chromosomes
- C.
Philatelist : Stamps
- D.
Grisly : appearance
Correct Answer
C. Philatelist : StampsExplanation
The correct answer is Philatelist : Stamps. A numismatist is someone who collects and studies coins, similarly, a philatelist is someone who collects and studies stamps. Both numismatists and philatelists have a specific interest in collecting and studying these particular items. The other options, jeweller and geneticist, do not follow the same pattern as they do not involve collecting and studying specific items like coins and stamps. Grisly: appearance is unrelated to the pattern established by the first two pairs.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Orator : Speech :: ?
- A.
Protagonist : story
- B.
Chronicler : events
- C.
Playwright : stage
- D.
Comedian : jokes
Correct Answer
D. Comedian : jokesExplanation
The analogy in the question is that an orator is someone who delivers a speech, just as a comedian is someone who delivers jokes. In both cases, the person is responsible for presenting and entertaining an audience with their respective forms of communication. Therefore, the correct answer is "Comedian : jokes".Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Dawn : Dusk :: Inauguration : ?
- A.
Invitation
- B.
Valediction
- C.
Repetition
- D.
Organization
Correct Answer
B. ValedictionExplanation
The analogy "Dawn : Dusk" implies a relationship of opposites, where dawn represents the beginning of the day and dusk represents the end. Similarly, "Inauguration : Valediction" follows the same pattern, with inauguration representing the beginning of an event or term, and valediction representing the end or farewell. The other options, invitation, repetition, and organization, do not fit this pattern of opposites and are therefore incorrect.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Fire : Extinguish :: Thirst : ?
- A.
Quench
- B.
Satiate
- C.
Mitigate
- D.
Drink
Correct Answer
D. DrinkExplanation
The analogy presented in the question is that fire is extinguished, just as thirst is quenched. The word "quench" means to satisfy or relieve, especially thirst. Therefore, the correct answer is "Drink" as it is the action that satisfies or relieves thirst.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Mathematics : Logic :: Science:?
- A.
Facts
- B.
Scientist
- C.
Experiment
- D.
Laboratory
Correct Answer
A. FactsExplanation
In this analogy, the relationship between Mathematics and Logic is being compared to the relationship between Science and Facts. Just as Mathematics is based on logical reasoning and principles, Science is based on facts and empirical evidence. Science relies on gathering and analyzing facts through experiments conducted in a laboratory. Therefore, the correct answer is "Facts".Rate this question:
-
- 9.
Horse : Gallop :: Duck : ?
- A.
Strut
- B.
Waddle
- C.
Prowl
- D.
Trot
Correct Answer
B. WaddleExplanation
The analogy between "Horse : Gallop" implies that gallop is a way of movement associated with horses. Similarly, "Duck : Waddle" suggests that waddle is a way of movement associated with ducks. Waddle is a distinctive way ducks move on land, characterized by a side-to-side motion. Therefore, waddle is the correct answer choice that completes the analogy.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Entrepreneur : Profit :: Scholar : ?
- A.
Income
- B.
Knowledge
- C.
Service
- D.
Business
Correct Answer
B. KnowledgeExplanation
The relationship between an entrepreneur and profit is that an entrepreneur seeks to generate profit through their business ventures. Similarly, a scholar seeks to acquire knowledge and expand their understanding in their chosen field. Both the entrepreneur and the scholar are driven by their respective goals - the entrepreneur by profit and the scholar by knowledge. Therefore, the correct analogy is that a scholar is motivated by knowledge.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
Flower : Bouquet :: ?
- A.
Soldier : company
- B.
Bread : cookies
- C.
Magazine : cover
- D.
Tap : water
Correct Answer
A. Soldier : companyExplanation
The analogy "Flower : Bouquet" implies that a bouquet is a collection or arrangement of flowers. Similarly, "soldier : company" suggests that a company is a group or unit of soldiers. Both analogies follow the pattern of a singular item being grouped or combined to form a larger whole. Therefore, the given answer "soldier : company" is the correct choice.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
Legible : Decipher :: ?
- A.
Intelligible : Understand
- B.
Cautious : Tread
- C.
Laudable : Expect
- D.
Nefarious : Construe
- E.
Written : Write
Correct Answer
A. Intelligible : UnderstandExplanation
The analogy between "legible" and "decipher" implies that "legible" means something that can be read or understood, and "decipher" means to interpret or make sense of something that is difficult to understand. Similarly, "intelligible" means something that can be understood, making "understand" the correct corresponding word.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
Electricity : Wire :: ?
- A.
Fluid : Pipe
- B.
Car : Highway
- C.
River : Bank
- D.
Light : Bulb
- E.
Music : Instrument
Correct Answer
A. Fluid : PipeExplanation
The analogy in the question is based on the relationship between electricity and wire, where electricity flows through a wire. Similarly, fluid flows through a pipe, making the analogy "Fluid : Pipe" the correct answer.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Insdisputable : Question :: ?
- A.
Unlikely : Know
- B.
Amoral : Perform
- C.
Incredible : Prove
- D.
Immutable : Change
- E.
Insoluble : Submerge
Correct Answer
D. Immutable : ChangeExplanation
The relationship between the words "Insdisputable" and "Question" is that the first word is the opposite or contradictory of the second word. Similarly, the word "Immutable" is the opposite or contradictory of the word "Change".Rate this question:
-
- 15.
Unscathed : Damaged :: ?
- A.
Ameliorated : Improvement
- B.
Obliterated : Invisibility
- C.
Rolled : Flatness
- D.
Shaken : Homogeneity
- E.
Arid : Dampness
Correct Answer
E. Arid : DampnessExplanation
The word "unscathed" means not harmed or damaged. Similarly, the word "arid" means extremely dry or lacking moisture. Therefore, the analogy suggests that just as something unscathed is not damaged, something arid is not damp or moist.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
Archive : Records :: ?
- A.
Box : shoes
- B.
Locker : uniform
- C.
Arsenal: arms
- D.
Pantry : bread
- E.
Arsenide : death
Correct Answer
C. Arsenal: armsExplanation
The relationship between "archive" and "records" is that an archive is a place where records are stored. Similarly, an "arsenal" is a place where "arms" (weapons) are stored. Therefore, the correct answer is "arsenal: arms."Rate this question:
-
- 17.
Dampen : Restrain :: ?
- A.
stagnate : flow
- B.
Purify : liquefy
- C.
Dilate : expand
- D.
Melt : disband
- E.
Stabilize : instill
Correct Answer
C. Dilate : expandExplanation
The relationship between the words "dampen" and "restrain" is that dampening something can help to restrain or control it. Similarly, the relationship between "dilate" and "expand" is that dilating something can cause it to expand or become larger.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
Protraction : Duration :: ?
- A.
Extension : length
- B.
retraction : instant
- C.
Corruption : truth
- D.
Taxation : wealth
- E.
Altercation : shape
Correct Answer
A. Extension : lengthExplanation
The relationship between "protraction" and "duration" is that protraction is the act of prolonging or extending something, while duration refers to the length of time that something lasts. Similarly, the relationship between "extension" and "length" is that extension is the act of stretching or making something longer, while length refers to the measurement of how long something is. Therefore, "extension : length" is the correct answer as it maintains the same relationship as "protraction : duration".Rate this question:
-
- 19.
Truss : Support :: ?
- A.
Calcium : bone
- B.
Fence : barrier
- C.
Tile : patio
- D.
Wood : burn
- E.
Tobacco : cigarette
Correct Answer
B. Fence : barrierExplanation
The relationship between "truss" and "support" is that a truss provides support. Similarly, the relationship between "fence" and "barrier" is that a fence serves as a barrier. A fence is a physical structure that acts as a barrier, preventing access or providing security. Therefore, "fence : barrier" is the correct analogy.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
Stars : Galaxy :: ?
- A.
Cells : prison
- B.
Sand : dune
- C.
Nuclei : atom
- D.
Eggs : nest
- E.
Hair : head
Correct Answer
B. Sand : duneExplanation
The relationship between stars and galaxy is that stars are a part of a galaxy. Similarly, sand is a part of a dune. A dune is a large hill of sand formed by wind or water, and sand is the material that makes up the dune. Therefore, the analogy between sand and dune is the same as the analogy between stars and galaxy.Rate this question:
-
- 21.
For questions 21 to 26, choose an option that has a meaning similar to word in the question. Hypothesis
- A.
Complexity
- B.
Theory
- C.
Feeling
- D.
Fascination
Correct Answer
B. TheoryExplanation
The word "hypothesis" refers to a proposed explanation or theory that is based on limited evidence. Similarly, the word "theory" also refers to a proposed explanation or system of ideas that is based on evidence and is used to explain a particular phenomenon. Both words suggest an idea or concept that is not yet proven but is used to explain something. Therefore, "theory" is a suitable option that has a similar meaning to "hypothesis".Rate this question:
-
- 22.
Remunerate
- A.
Pay
- B.
Enumerate
- C.
Repair
- D.
Rebuild
Correct Answer
A. PayExplanation
The word "remunerate" means to compensate or reward someone for their work or services. The word "pay" also means to give someone money in exchange for goods or services. Therefore, "pay" is the correct answer as it is a synonym of "remunerate" and fits the context of the question.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
Apocalypse
- A.
Revenge
- B.
Prophetic disclosure
- C.
Unreasonable
- D.
Reversal
Correct Answer
B. Prophetic disclosureExplanation
Prophetic disclosure refers to the act of revealing or predicting future events through divine inspiration or foresight. In the context of the word "apocalypse," which often refers to a catastrophic event or the end of the world, prophetic disclosure is the most fitting answer. It suggests that the apocalypse is being foretold or disclosed through prophecy. The other options, revenge, unreasonable, and reversal, do not accurately capture the meaning or association of the word "apocalypse."Rate this question:
-
- 24.
Outgoing
- A.
Extraverted
- B.
Contained
- C.
Outside
- D.
Exit
Correct Answer
A. ExtravertedExplanation
The word "extraverted" is the best fit for the given word "outgoing" as both words describe a person who is sociable, friendly, and enjoys being around others. "Contained," "outside," and "exit" do not have the same meaning as "outgoing" and do not fit the context.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
Altruistic
- A.
Tough
- B.
Berated
- C.
Philanthropic
- D.
Honest
Correct Answer
C. PhilanthropicExplanation
The word "philanthropic" means to be generous and charitable towards others, often with a focus on helping those in need. This aligns with the concept of being altruistic, which means to be selfless and concerned for the well-being of others. "Tough" and "berated" have negative connotations and do not relate to the idea of being philanthropic. "Honest" is a positive trait but does not directly relate to the concept of being philanthropic. Therefore, "philanthropic" is the most suitable answer.Rate this question:
-
- 26.
Meticulous
- A.
Lethargic
- B.
Jubilant
- C.
Thorough
- D.
Aggressive
Correct Answer
C. ThoroughExplanation
The word "thorough" means to be complete or careful in doing something. Out of the given options, "thorough" is the best fit as it aligns with the meaning of meticulous, which means to be extremely careful and precise. The other options - lethargic, jubilant, and aggressive - do not have similar meanings and are unrelated to the word "meticulous". Therefore, "thorough" is the correct answer.Rate this question:
-
- 27.
For questions 27-30, choose the word or phrase whose meaning is most nearly opposite to the meaning of the given word. Lucid
- A.
Ornate
- B.
Arrogant
- C.
Embroiled
- D.
Obscure
Correct Answer
D. ObscureExplanation
The word "lucid" means clear, easily understood, or rational. The word "obscure" means unclear, difficult to understand, or unknown. These two words have opposite meanings, as "lucid" suggests clarity and understanding, while "obscure" suggests confusion or lack of clarity.Rate this question:
-
- 28.
Skeptical
- A.
Theoretical
- B.
Gullible
- C.
Eager for chance
- D.
Lost in thought
Correct Answer
B. GullibleExplanation
Gullible means easily fooled or deceived, often due to a lack of skepticism or critical thinking. This word is the correct answer because it contrasts with the other options. Skeptical means having doubts or reservations, theoretical means based on theory or speculation, eager for chance means being willing to take risks or seize opportunities, and lost in thought means deeply engrossed or preoccupied. Therefore, gullible is the most appropriate word to describe someone who is easily fooled or deceived.Rate this question:
-
- 29.
Interminable
- A.
Brief
- B.
Constant
- C.
External
- D.
Physical
Correct Answer
A. BriefExplanation
The word "interminable" means endless or never-ending. It is the opposite of the word "brief," which means short or of short duration. Therefore, "brief" is the correct answer as it is the antonym of "interminable."Rate this question:
-
- 30.
Insensible
- A.
Cognizant
- B.
Pragmatic
- C.
Pompous
- D.
Patrician
Correct Answer
A. CognizantExplanation
Cognizant is the correct answer because it means being aware or having knowledge of something. Insensible means lacking awareness or understanding, pragmatic means practical and sensible, pompous means arrogant or self-important, and patrician means a member of the upper class. Out of these options, only cognizant is synonymous with being aware or having knowledge, making it the correct answer.Rate this question:
-
- 31.
Statement: Should young entrepreneurs be encouraged? Arguments: 1. Yes. They will help in industrial development of the country. 2. Yes. They will reduce the burden on employment market.
- A.
Only argument I is strong
- B.
Only argument II is strong
- C.
Either I or II is strong
- D.
Neither I nor II is strong.
- E.
Both I and II are strong.
Correct Answer
E. Both I and II are strong.Explanation
Both arguments I and II are strong. Young entrepreneurs have the potential to contribute significantly to the industrial development of the country. Their innovative ideas and fresh perspectives can lead to the creation of new industries and the growth of existing ones. Additionally, encouraging young entrepreneurs can also help reduce the burden on the employment market by creating new job opportunities for themselves and others. Thus, both arguments support the idea that young entrepreneurs should be encouraged.Rate this question:
-
- 32.
Statement: Should 'computer knowledge' be made a compulsory subject for all the students at secondary school level? Arguments: 1. No, our need is 'bread' for everyone, we cannot follow western models. 2. Yes. We cannot compete in the international market without equipping our children with computers.
- A.
Only argument I is strong
- B.
Only argument II is strong
- C.
Either I or II is strong
- D.
Neither I nor II is strong
- E.
Both I and II are strong
Correct Answer
B. Only argument II is strongExplanation
The correct answer is "Only argument II is strong."
Argument II states that equipping students with computer knowledge is necessary in order to compete in the international market. This is a strong argument because in today's digital age, computer literacy is essential for various industries and job opportunities. Without computer knowledge, students may be at a disadvantage when it comes to employment and economic growth. Argument I, on the other hand, is not relevant to the question and does not provide a strong reason for making computer knowledge a compulsory subject.Rate this question:
-
- 33.
Statement: Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized? Arguments:
- Yes: It would lead to higher production.
- No: Many villagers would be left unemployed.
- A.
Only argument I is strong
- B.
Only argument II is strong
- C.
Either I or II is strong
- D.
Neither I nor II is strong
- E.
Both I and II are strong
Correct Answer
A. Only argument I is strongExplanation
The correct answer is "Only argument I is strong." This is because the argument that mechanizing agriculture in rural India would lead to higher production is a valid point. Mechanization can increase efficiency and productivity in farming, leading to higher yields. On the other hand, the argument that many villagers would be left unemployed is not as strong because it does not consider the potential for job creation in other sectors that may arise due to mechanization.Rate this question:
- 34.
Statements:
- India is becoming industrialized.
- Pollution is a problem associated with industrialization.
- A.
All Assumptions are appropriate
- B.
No assumption is appropriate
- C.
Only assumption 4 is appropriate
- D.
Only assumption 2 is appropriate
Correct Answer
C. Only assumption 4 is appropriateExplanation
Assumption 4 is appropriate because it states that India may become polluted, which is supported by the statement that pollution is a problem associated with industrialization. This assumption acknowledges the possibility that as India becomes more industrialized, pollution levels may increase. The other assumptions are not supported by the given statements.Rate this question:
- 35.
Statement: Quite independent of the global economic meltdown, India's neglect of its physical infrastructure has been a malaise demanding radical treatment. Assumptions: I. Radical treatment would reduce the adverse effects of global economic meltdown and India's neglect of its physical infrastructure. II. Physical infrastructure is the base of high growth trajectory.
- A.
Only assumption I is implicit
- B.
Only assumption II is implicit.
- C.
Either I or II is implicit.
- D.
Neither I nor II is implicit.
- E.
Both I and II are implicit.
Correct Answer
D. Neither I nor II is implicit.Explanation
The given statement mentions that India's neglect of its physical infrastructure has been a malaise demanding radical treatment. However, it does not provide any information or indication about the impact of this neglect on the global economic meltdown. Therefore, assumption I is not implicit. Additionally, the statement does not explicitly state that physical infrastructure is the base of high growth trajectory, so assumption II is also not implicit. Hence, neither assumption I nor II can be inferred from the given statement.Rate this question:
-
- 36.
Statement: Anger is energy, in a more proactive way and how to channelize it is in itself a skill. Assumptions: I. Anger needs to be channelized. II. Only skillful people can channelize anger to energy.
- A.
Only assumption I is implicit.
- B.
Only assumption II is implicit.
- C.
Either I or II is implicit.
- D.
Neither I nor II is implicit.
- E.
Both I and II are implicit.
Correct Answer
B. Only assumption II is implicit.Explanation
The statement suggests that anger can be channeled into energy, implying that it needs to be directed in a productive way. This supports assumption I, that anger needs to be channelized. However, there is no indication in the statement that only skillful people can channelize anger into energy, so assumption II is not implicit. Therefore, the correct answer is "Only assumption I is implicit."Rate this question:
-
- 37.
Statement: The government may reduce the export duty on Basmati rice, in view of competition from Pakistan in the international market. Assumptions: I. Reduction in export duty leads to increase in exports. II. Pakistan is an exporter of Basmati rice.
- A.
Only assumption I is implicit.
- B.
Only assumption II is implicit.
- C.
Either I or II is implicit.
- D.
Neither I nor II is implicit.
- E.
Both I and II are implicit.
Correct Answer
A. Only assumption I is implicit.Explanation
The given statement suggests that the government may reduce the export duty on Basmati rice due to competition from Pakistan. Assumption I is implicit because it states that a reduction in export duty leads to an increase in exports, which aligns with the government's intention to compete with Pakistan. Assumption II is not implicit as the statement does not directly mention Pakistan as an exporter of Basmati rice, it only mentions competition from Pakistan. Therefore, the correct answer is "Only assumption I is implicit."Rate this question:
-
- 38.
Statement: People of all ages have found us good people to grow with. Assumptions: I. People want to grow. II. We are good people.
- A.
Only assumption I is implicit
- B.
Only assumption II is implicit.
- C.
Either I or II is implicit.
- D.
Neither I nor II is implicit.
- E.
Both I and II are implicit.
Correct Answer
A. Only assumption I is implicitExplanation
The given statement implies that people have found the speaker or the group they belong to as good people to grow with. This suggests that assumption II is implicit, as it is stated that "we are good people." However, assumption I is also implicit because the statement implies that people want to grow, otherwise they would not be seeking out others to grow with. Therefore, both assumptions I and II are implicit.Rate this question:
-
- 39.
Statement: "Enjoy your challenges" - an advertisement of a car brand. Assumptions: I. People wish to enjoy challenges. II. There are people who are willing to buy a car.
- A.
Only assumption I is implicit.
- B.
Only assumption II is implicit.
- C.
Either I or II is implicit.
- D.
Neither I nor II is implicit.
- E.
Both I and II are implicit.
Correct Answer
D. Neither I nor II is implicit.Explanation
The statement "Enjoy your challenges" is an advertisement slogan for a car brand. It does not explicitly state that people wish to enjoy challenges or that there are people willing to buy a car. The statement is open to interpretation and does not provide enough information to make assumptions about people's desires or buying behavior. Therefore, neither assumption I nor II is implicit.Rate this question:
-
- 40.
Statement − An apple a day, keeps the doctor away. Conclusions − I. Apple is good for health. II. Orange is better than apple.
- A.
Only conclusion I follows
- B.
Only conclusion II follows
- C.
Either conclusion I or II follows
- D.
Neither conclusion I or II follows
- E.
Both conclusion I and II follow.
Correct Answer
A. Only conclusion I followsExplanation
Conclusion I follows because the statement "An apple a day, keeps the doctor away" implies that apples are good for health. However, conclusion II does not follow as the statement does not provide any information about the comparison between apples and oranges.Rate this question:
-
- 41.
Statement − You work hard and consistently, you will pass the exam. Conclusions − I. Working hard is necessary to pass the exam. II. Consistency is required to pass the exam.
- A.
Only conclusion I is valid.
- B.
Only conclusion II is valid.
- C.
Either conclusion I or II is valid.
- D.
Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- E.
Both the conclusions are valid.
Correct Answer
E. Both the conclusions are valid.Explanation
Both conclusions I and II are valid because the statement states that if you work hard and consistently, you will pass the exam. This implies that both working hard and being consistent are necessary conditions for passing the exam. Therefore, conclusion I, which states that working hard is necessary to pass the exam, is valid. Similarly, conclusion II, which states that consistency is required to pass the exam, is also valid.Rate this question:
-
- 42.
Studies last year concluded coffee drinking had little, if any, effect on the risk of pancreatic or kidney cancer. A study of 59,000 women in Sweden found no link between caffeine and kidney cancer. Another review suggested that those who drink coffee have half the risk of pancreatic cancer. Which of the following statements, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn above?
- A.
The study is done in cold countries only, countries in arid and semi-arid regions are not considered under this study.
- B.
Indians drink more coffee than the Swedish do.
- C.
The caffeine content is different in different varieties of coffee.
- D.
Intake of 15 ml to 30 mi of milk per day offsets the negative effects of caffeine. The study did not consider the milk intake.
- E.
None of these
Correct Answer
D. Intake of 15 ml to 30 mi of milk per day offsets the negative effects of caffeine. The study did not consider the milk intake.Explanation
The given statement weakens the conclusion because it suggests that the potential negative effects of caffeine found in the study may be offset by the intake of milk. Since the study did not consider milk intake, it cannot be concluded that coffee drinking has no effect on the risk of pancreatic or kidney cancer.Rate this question:
-
- 43.
When the tourist boat capsized, the crime branch arrested the forest department's ticket collector, Prakashan, based on the allegation that he did not check the tickets properly. But could Prakashan, who works on daily wages be the real culprit? Which of the following is not what the passage is intended to indicate?
- A.
Prakashan may not be the real culprit.
- B.
Prakashan has not checked the tickets properly.
- C.
Prakashan may not be the main person behind the mishap.
- D.
The police have behaved irresponsibly.
- E.
None of these
Correct Answer
C. Prakashan may not be the main person behind the mishap.Explanation
The passage suggests that Prakashan, the forest department's ticket collector, was arrested based on the allegation that he did not check the tickets properly. However, the passage does not indicate whether Prakashan is the main person behind the mishap or not. Therefore, the statement "Prakashan may not be the main person behind the mishap" is not what the passage is intended to indicate.Rate this question:
-
- 44.
While the ivory trade has been banned in most developed nations, in newly-developed countries ivory is prized as a signal of wealth. In particular, there is great demand for complete elephant tusks - items that have spawned a counterfeit industry in which replicas of complete tusks are mass-produced and sold as real ivory. Buyers should beware, however, of tusks that have no imperfections as these are almost certainly counterfeits. Which of the following most strengthens the argument above?
- A.
The process of counterfeiting ivory has become so sophisticated that it is difficult for most people to tell the difference between authentic and counterfeit tusks
- B.
Many ivory purchasers are aware of the counterfeit market and are as happy with fake ivory as they would be with real ivory.
- C.
Some governments in developing economies have encouraged the counterfeit ivory market as a way to satisfy demand without harming animals to increase the supply.
- D.
Elephants regularly use their tusks to scrape bark from trees, a process that leads to the frequent chipping and breaking of tusks.
- E.
Counterfeit ivory is often damaged during shipping due to the fragile material necessary to make the product cost-effective.
Correct Answer
D. Elephants regularly use their tusks to scrape bark from trees, a process that leads to the frequent chipping and breaking of tusks.Explanation
This statement strengthens the argument by providing a possible explanation for why tusks with imperfections are more likely to be real ivory. If elephants regularly use their tusks to scrape bark from trees, it is reasonable to assume that real ivory tusks would have imperfections such as chipping and breaking. Therefore, tusks without imperfections are more likely to be counterfeits.Rate this question:
-
- 45.
Between 2000 and 2010 the rabbit population along the coast of Nova Scotia declined dramatically. Wildlife biologists studying the decline could find no signs of disease or undernourishment, so it is likely that the decline was caused by increased predation. Coyotes prefer to hunt larger mammals such as deer and elk, but it is well known that the deer population in Nova Scotia declined substantially in that period because of chronic wasting disease, a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy affecting the herd. Therefore, it is likely that coyotes were the cause of the dramatic decline in the rabbit population. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?
- A.
Despite a substantial decline in the deer population between 2000 and 2010, there were still enough deer to support the coyote population in the region.
- B.
Coyotes are known to eat mice and other vermin, ground birds, insects, and even fish.
- C.
It is difficult for most wildlife biologists to properly assess whether the decline of an animal population is caused by disease or undernourishment.
- D.
Between 2000 and 2010, the rabbit population on several islands off the coast that are inaccessible to coyotes did not decline.
- E.
Since 2010, the rabbit population has recovered well while the deer population has declined even further
Correct Answer
D. Between 2000 and 2010, the rabbit population on several islands off the coast that are inaccessible to coyotes did not decline.Explanation
The fact that the rabbit population on several islands off the coast that are inaccessible to coyotes did not decline strengthens the argument that coyotes were the cause of the dramatic decline in the rabbit population. This is because it suggests that factors other than disease or undernourishment, such as increased predation by coyotes, were responsible for the decline. If the decline was solely due to disease or undernourishment, the rabbit population on these islands would also have been affected.Rate this question:
-
- 46.
More and more computer software that is capable of correcting not just spelling, but also grammar and punctuation is being developed. Therefore, it is increasingly unnecessary for working reporters and writers to have a complete knowledge of the principles of English grammar and punctuation. Consequently, in training journalists, less emphasis should be placed on the principles of grammar so that students and professors can concentrate on other important subjects. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given for the recommendation above?
- A.
The effective use of software that corrects grammar and punctuation requires an understanding of grammatical principles.
- B.
Much of the software that corrects grammar and punctuation is already in use.
- C.
Development of more complex ethical guidelines for reporters and writers has meant that professors and students in journalism schools must allow time for teaching such issues.
- D.
Most of the software that is capable of correcting grammar and punctuation can be on the types of computer available to most media outlets.
- E.
The journalism curriculum already requires that journalism students be familiar with, and able to use, a variety of software package.
Correct Answer
A. The effective use of software that corrects grammar and punctuation requires an understanding of grammatical principles.Explanation
This statement weakens the argument because it suggests that even though software is available to correct grammar and punctuation, it still requires an understanding of grammatical principles to effectively use it. This implies that journalists and writers still need to have a complete knowledge of grammar in order to properly utilize the software. Therefore, less emphasis on grammar principles in training would not be beneficial as it would hinder their ability to effectively use the software.Rate this question:
-
- 47.
Physician: The continued use of this drug to treat patients with a certain disease cannot be adequately supported by the proposition that any drug that treats the disease is more effective than no treatment at all. What must also be taken into account is that this drug is very expensive and has notable side effects. Which one of the following is the most accurately expressed main point of the physician’s argument?
- A.
The drug is more effective than other forms of treatment for the disease.
- B.
The drug is more effective than no treatment at all.
- C.
The drug is more expensive than other forms of treatment for the disease.
- D.
The drug should not be used to treat the disease unless it is either effective or inexpensive.
- E.
The drug’s possible effectiveness in treating the disease is not sufficient justification for using it.
Correct Answer
E. The drug’s possible effectiveness in treating the disease is not sufficient justification for using it.Explanation
The physician argues that the proposition that any drug that treats the disease is more effective than no treatment at all is not sufficient justification for the continued use of this expensive and side-effect prone drug. Therefore, the main point of the physician's argument is that the drug's possible effectiveness in treating the disease is not enough to justify its use.Rate this question:
-
- 48.
While tablet computer sales have increased steadily over the last 2 years, we can expect a reversal of this trend in the near future. Since they became popular in the marketplace 5 years ago, 60 percent of tablet computers sold have been purchased by people from 18 to 25 years of age, and the number of people in this age group is expected to decline steadily over the next 15 year. which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
- A.
Sales of tablet computers to small businesses has declined over the past 2 years.
- B.
Most purchasers of tablet computers over the past 2 years have been over the age of 25.
- C.
The number of different types of tablet computers available is likely to increase in the near future.
- D.
Most people under the age of 18 have never purchased a tablet computer.
- E.
New technology will make new computing options available over the next 15 years.
Correct Answer
B. Most purchasers of tablet computers over the past 2 years have been over the age of 25.Explanation
The argument states that since 60% of tablet computers sold in the past 5 years were purchased by people aged 18 to 25, the expected decline in this age group will lead to a reversal in tablet computer sales. However, if it is true that most purchasers of tablet computers over the past 2 years have been over the age of 25, it weakens the argument because it suggests that the decline in the 18 to 25 age group may not have a significant impact on sales.Rate this question:
-
- 49.
Businesses that invest in renewable energy tend to view profit as secondary to social responsibility. Investments in renewable energy are also very risky and several have been known to cause their company very large losses. Therefore, it is a bad idea for you to invest in renewable energy. Which on the following, if true, most weakens the argument presented above?
- A.
Typically, companies that have very big losses go bankrupt within a year
- B.
Companies that focus on social responsibility first tend to have lower profits.
- C.
Many investment strategies dictate that you should diversify your portfolio.
- D.
Most businesses do not invest in renewable energy.
- E.
Companies that invest in renewable energy compensate for their high risk by diversifying the energy sources they use
Correct Answer
E. Companies that invest in renewable energy compensate for their high risk by diversifying the energy sources they useExplanation
The given answer weakens the argument by suggesting that companies that invest in renewable energy mitigate the risk of large losses by diversifying their energy sources. This implies that not all investments in renewable energy are very risky, as some companies are able to manage the risk effectively. Therefore, the argument's assumption that investing in renewable energy is always a bad idea due to potential large losses is weakened.Rate this question:
-
- 50.
Roland: It is important for us to cut down on our usage of fossil fuels. Therefore, we must invest in new hybrid technology for vehicles. Hybrid technology will help us decrease our dependency on fossil fuels. Hybrid vehicles use half the fossil fuels per mile than other vehicles. Tomassi: Not true. There are many ways that we can reduce our usage of fossil fuels without spending money on developing hybrid vehicles. Roland assumes which one of the following?
- A.
That drivers who switch from regular vehicles to hybrid vehicles will drive less than twice as much as they did prior to the switch.
- B.
That more consumers will be able to afford hybrid vehicles than other types of vehicles
- C.
That all vehicles can be converted to hybrid technology
- D.
That hybrid vehicles have the same horsepower as fossil fueled vehicles
- E.
That the consumer demand for hybrid vehicles is elastic
Correct Answer
A. That drivers who switch from regular vehicles to hybrid vehicles will drive less than twice as much as they did prior to the switch.Explanation
Roland's argument is based on the assumption that drivers who switch from regular vehicles to hybrid vehicles will not drastically increase their driving distance. This assumption is important because if drivers end up driving more than twice as much as they did before, the overall fuel consumption may not decrease significantly. Therefore, Roland's argument for investing in hybrid technology hinges on the assumption that drivers will not significantly increase their driving distance when they switch to hybrid vehicles.Rate this question:
-
- Academic Quizzes
- Adult Learning Quizzes
- Blended Learning Quizzes
- Career Quizzes
- Coaching Quizzes
- College Quizzes
- Curriculum Quizzes
- Distance Learning Quizzes
- E Learning Quizzes
- Early Childhood Education Quizzes
- GCSE Quizzes
- Grade Quizzes
- Graduation Quizzes
- Kindergarten Quizzes
- Knowledge Quizzes
- Literacy Quizzes
- Online Assessment Quizzes
- Online Exam Quizzes
- Online Test Quizzes
- Physical Education Quizzes
- Qualification Quizzes
- Religious Education Quizzes
- School Quizzes
- Special Education Quizzes
- Student Quizzes
- Study Quizzes
- Teaching Quizzes
- Theory Quizzes
- Thesis Quizzes
- University Quizzes
Back to top