Impact Policies And Procedures - Prohibited And Restricted Practices

Explanation
Physical punishment refers to any form of physical harm or violence inflicted on someone as a means of discipline or control. This can include hitting, slapping, or any other form of physical aggression. Prohibiting physical punishment means that it is not allowed or permitted in any circumstances. This is done to protect individuals from harm and promote non-violent means of discipline and conflict resolution.

Explanation
The practice described, which involves immobilisation or deprivation of food as a form of punishment, is considered to be prohibited.

Explanation
This practice is considered prohibited because any punishment that is intended to humiliate or frighten a child or young person is not allowed. Such punishments can have negative psychological and emotional effects on children, and can be considered as a form of abuse. Therefore, it is important to prohibit this practice to ensure the well-being and safety of children and young people.

Explanation
The practice described in the question involves the application of painful or noxious conditions, such as unwanted cold or hot baths, unwanted applications of chilli powder on food, and unwanted squirting of liquid on a child's or young person's face or body parts. This type of practice is considered aversive and is therefore prohibited.

Explanation
The practice of depriving a child or young person of their basic needs is considered prohibited. This means that it is not allowed or forbidden by law. It is important to ensure that children and young people have access to their basic needs such as food, shelter, clothing, and healthcare in order to promote their well-being and development.

Explanation
The practice of over-correction, as described in the question, is prohibited. Over-correction involves requiring a child or young person to excessively correct a disrupted situation following challenging behavior. This could include tasks such as cleaning the entire dining room or practicing arm exercises. Prohibiting this practice suggests that it is considered inappropriate or ineffective in addressing challenging behavior.

Explanation
Chemical restraint involves the intentional use of medication to control a child's or young person's behavior without any medically identified condition. This practice is considered unethical and harmful as it aims to sedate individuals for convenience or disciplinary purposes. Therefore, it is prohibited, meaning it is not allowed or permitted.

Explanation
Physical restraint is prohibited in this case because it is not being used in response to a behavior that is likely to result in harm to the child or those around them. The use of physical restraint should only be allowed when it is necessary to prevent harm, but in this situation, it is not justified.

Explanation
Seclusion is a prohibited practice as the Children and Young Persons Care and Protection Act does not allow for this practice to be used with a child or young person in response to behaviour, or a critical incident without a court order specifically relating to the child, young person, and situation.

Explanation
Restricted practices should only be used as a last resort, after all other strategies have been tried and failed. They should be part of a formal multi-element Behavior Support Plan, which includes a comprehensive approach to addressing the challenging behavior. Additionally, the use of restricted practices should be approved at a team meeting to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are involved in the decision-making process. They should also be implemented as part of the child or young person's Case Plan, which outlines their individual needs and goals.

Explanation
Response cost is a common discipline technique and as such would not normally require formal approval (for example, fighting over a toy may result in the removal of the toy until the dispute is resolved). However, if this practice is used to target particular challenging behaviours, it should be documented as part of the behaviour management plan, which would then require the consent of the person with parental responsibility for the child or young person. It should be noted that positive reinforcement (i.e. rewarding the child with a valued item/activity in response to appropriate behaviour) is often a far more positive and effective practice than response cost.

Explanation
The correct answer is "Restricted" because the passage clearly defines restricted access as limiting a child or young person's independent access to items, activities, or experiences through physical barriers. This is done to decrease or limit their behavior or access to these things. The example given of putting a lock on the fridge to prevent independent access to food further supports the idea of restricted access. Therefore, the practice described in the passage is restricted, not prohibited.

Explanation
This is part of an overall planned response aimed at changing or eliminating specific challenging behaviours.

There should be specific safeguards for the use of this strategy when the person is removed from one setting and physically moved to another setting (e.g. room, corridor) on their own, following the person’s demonstration of the identified behaviour. Exclusionary time-out may amount to a criminal assault or wrongful imprisonment, except when used as a temporary measure to restrain a child or young person who might otherwise seriously injure themselves or some other person.

Explanation
Non-exclusionary time-out is a common discipline technique and as such would not normally require formal approval. However, if this practice is used to target particular challenging behaviours, it should be documented as part of the behaviour management plan, which would then require the consent of the person with parental responsibility for the child or young person. Non-exclusionary time-out does not involve the forcible removal or confinement of the child or young person. Provided that this does not involve force or confinement it would not normally be considered unlawful. However, if it is intended to, or has the effect of, humiliating a child or young person it is prohibited.

Explanation
Psychotropic medication is not completely prohibited but it is restricted. This means that while it is allowed under certain circumstances, there are limitations and regulations in place regarding its use. The use of psychotropic medication is closely monitored and controlled to ensure that it is used appropriately and in the best interest of the child or young person's mental health.