Evaluating Sources Quiz Questions And Answers
-
When determining if a site is reliable, one should look for an author listed.
-
True
-
False
-
Do you have a good understanding of evaluating sources? You can take this evaluating sources quiz questions and answers and test your knowledge. Evaluating sources is defined as doing research work on a difficult or complex task in which credibility depends upon the reliability of the information. The sources or medium through which we get information. This is a quick See moreand simple quiz to check declarative knowledge of sources in research. So, let's try out the quiz. All the best!
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Another strategy to determine the reliability of a website is to look for a date of publication or a date when the information was lasted updated
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
This statement is true because the presence of a date of publication or last update on a website can help determine the reliability of the information provided. If the date is recent, it indicates that the website is regularly maintained and the information is likely to be current and accurate. On the other hand, if there is no date or the date is very old, it may suggest that the information is outdated and no longer reliable. Therefore, checking for a date of publication or last update is a useful strategy to assess the reliability of a website.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
What is the difference between a scholarly article & a popular article?
-
A scholarly article is written for a scholarly audience, while a popular article is typically written for the general public or a non-specialist audience.
-
A scholarly article is one assigned by a course instructor, while a popular article is one recommended by your peers.
-
No difference. They're the same thing!
-
A scholarly article is at least 5000 words long, while a popular article is typically 140 characters or less.
-
None of the above
Correct Answer
A. A scholarly article is written for a scholarly audience, while a popular article is typically written for the general public or a non-specialist audience.Explanation
A scholarly article is written for a scholarly audience, while a popular article is typically written for the general public or a non-specialist audience. This means that scholarly articles are written with a higher level of complexity and depth, using specialized terminology and assuming a certain level of knowledge from the reader. On the other hand, popular articles are written in a more accessible and engaging manner, using simpler language and providing background information to cater to a wider audience.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Which of the following is NOT a common criterion for evaluating a source for inclusion in a course paper or bibliography?
-
Currency
-
Fun
-
Authority
-
Perspective or bias
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. FunExplanation
The criterion "Fun" is not a common criterion for evaluating a source for inclusion in a course paper or bibliography. When evaluating sources, scholars typically consider factors such as currency, authority, and perspective or bias. However, the element of "fun" does not hold any relevance in determining the credibility or academic value of a source.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Which of the following is NOT a key factor to consider when evaluating the credibility of a source?
-
The author's expertise and qualifications
-
The publication date and currency of information
-
The presence of emotional language and bias
-
The visual appeal and design of the source
Correct Answer
A. The visual appeal and design of the sourceExplanation
While a visually appealing source can be engaging, it doesn't necessarily indicate credibility. The author's expertise, the publication date, and the presence of bias are more important factors to consider when evaluating a source's trustworthiness.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
History Professor X has written a very detailed and interesting book about Japanese Imperialism that was published in 2005.
-
It is a primary source.
-
It is a reliable source.
-
It is a secondary source.
-
It has high proximity.
-
It is not biased.
Correct Answer
A. It is a secondary source.Explanation
The given book written by Professor X about Japanese Imperialism is classified as a secondary source. This is because it was published in 2005, which means it was created after the events it discusses took place. Secondary sources are typically based on primary sources and provide analysis, interpretation, or commentary on a topic. Therefore, the book is not a primary source, but it can still be considered reliable and informative for studying Japanese Imperialism. The answer does not mention bias or proximity, so we cannot determine those aspects based on the given information.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
________ refers to the perspective or possible agenda of the document or witness. It may or may not affect validity.
-
Proximity
-
Validity
-
Reliability
-
Pathos
-
Bias
Correct Answer
A. BiasExplanation
Bias refers to the perspective or possible agenda of the document or witness. It is an inclination or prejudice that may influence the information presented or the way it is interpreted. Bias can impact the validity of the information, as it may introduce a skewed or one-sided viewpoint. However, it does not necessarily determine the accuracy or reliability of the information, as bias can exist even in credible sources.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
_________ refers to who produced your document or where it came from.
-
Validity
-
Reliability
-
Proximity
-
Bias
-
Ethos
Correct Answer
A. ReliabilityExplanation
Reliability refers to the consistency and dependability of a document's source. It indicates whether the information can be trusted and is based on credible and accurate sources. In this context, reliability is important because it ensures that the document is produced by a trustworthy and credible source, which adds credibility and validity to the information presented.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
If several pieces of evidence lead you to the same conclusion, they may be said to ___________ each other.
-
Corroborate
-
Collaborate
-
Rely upon
-
Validate
-
Approximate
Correct Answer
A. CorroborateExplanation
When several pieces of evidence lead to the same conclusion, they support or strengthen each other. The word "corroborate" means to confirm or verify the truth or accuracy of something by providing additional evidence or support. Therefore, the evidence "corroborates" each other, reinforcing the conclusion that is drawn from it.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Based solely on the domain name, which of the following websites is most likely to contain authoritative government information?
-
Http://reputableinformation.edu
-
Http://reputableinformation.com
-
Http://reputableinformation.org
-
Http://reputableinformation.gov
-
Http://reputableinformation.net
Correct Answer
A. Http://reputableinformation.govExplanation
Websites with the ".gov" domain name are reserved for government agencies in the United States. Therefore, a website with the domain name "reputableinformation.gov" is more likely to contain authoritative government information compared to websites with other domain extensions such as ".edu", ".com", ".org", or ".net".Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Jan 15, 2025 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Jan 15, 2025Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Feb 11, 2008Quiz Created by
Japander
Back to top