Eu - Supremacy: Structure

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Chriscullen
C
Chriscullen
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 12 | Total Attempts: 2,639
| Attempts: 101 | Questions: 11
Please wait...
Question 1 / 11
0 %
0/100
Score 0/100
1. There are two stances to supremacy, the CJEU stance, which is...

Explanation

The explanation for the given correct answer is that according to the CJEU stance, EU law holds absolute internal supremacy over all national laws. This means that EU law takes precedence over any conflicting national laws within member states. This supremacy is derived directly from the Treaties signed by all member states, which establishes the legal framework for the European Union. While member states have the authority to use or ignore EU laws, they are still obligated to comply with EU law and may only ignore it in cases of inconsistency with their own constitutional laws.

Submit
Please wait...
About This Quiz
Eu - Supremacy: Structure - Quiz


Hopefully a useful punt at Supremacy - sorry for any inconsistencies since it is the night/morning before the exam!

2. This CJEU case confirms the EU approach - that EU law prevails...

Explanation

Costa v ENEL is a CJEU case that confirms the EU approach that EU law prevails over national law. In this case, the CJEU ruled that EU law is an integral part of the national legal systems of EU member states and takes precedence over conflicting national laws. This decision established the principle of the supremacy of EU law, ensuring its uniform application and effectiveness across all member states.

Submit
3. GERMANY This case emphasised that, although they would have no option but to apply consitutional law over EU law, there is very little scope for conflict since the Treaty of Lisbon.

Explanation

The case mentioned in the question highlighted that even though Germany is required to prioritize constitutional law over EU law, there is minimal potential for conflict since the Treaty of Lisbon. The name "Gauweiler" is the correct answer, but the explanation does not provide any further context or details about the case or the significance of Gauweiler.

Submit
4. And the National Constitutional Court Stance is...

Explanation

The answer states that constitutional law has supremacy over EU law because EU law is only enacted because of the national constitution. The National Constitutional Court (NCC) will favor national constitutional law over EU law in case of a conflict. This means that member states have the ultimate authority to use or ignore EU laws as they please, as long as it aligns with their national constitution.

Submit
5. TOL ARTICLE 6(2) does what...

Explanation

ARTICLE 6(2) of the EU does not make the EU respect Member State constitutions when law-making or give the EUCFR legal status. Instead, it refers to the EU signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights. This means that the EU would agree to be bound by the rights and obligations outlined in the Convention, ensuring that human rights are protected within the EU.

Submit
6. There are three national approaches we need to be able to discuss; Poland, Germany and the UK so we'll quiz you on all three in turn! POLAND Poland, like the other states, adopt the view that EU law is dependant on the national constitution opting membership with the EU. What's the name of the Journal Article that confirms Poland's unfriendly tone - but in practice they apply the law consistently with EU law?

Explanation

not-available-via-ai

Submit
7. TOL ARTICLE 6(3) does what...

Explanation

Article 6(3) of the EU treaty states that fundamental rights in the national constitutions of member states should be considered as part of the EU's general principles. This means that the EU recognizes and respects the fundamental rights enshrined in the national constitutions of its member states and incorporates them into its own principles. It ensures that member states are obligated to uphold and abide by EU laws, including the protection of fundamental rights.

Submit
8. GERMANY Again, Germany took a destructive approach, suggesting that sovereignty lies with the German Constitution, however they do give supremacy to ordinary German law. This case focuses on the unfriendly approach, even to the extent of declaring their right to subject EU law to an ultra-vires review if their legal protection cannot be secured at EU level.

Explanation

not-available-via-ai

Submit
9. TOL ARTICLE 6(1) does what...

Explanation

Article 6(1) gives the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (EUCFR) legal status. This means that the EUCFR is recognized and has binding legal force within the EU. It ensures that the rights and principles outlined in the charter are respected and upheld by the EU institutions and member states when making and implementing laws.

Submit
10. Here's a good point to focus on the Treaty of Lisbon... ARTICLE 4(2) does what...

Explanation

Article 4(2) of the Treaty of Lisbon establishes a principle that the EU must respect the constitutions of its Member States when making laws. This means that the EU cannot pass laws that contradict or undermine the constitutional provisions of its Member States. This provision ensures that the EU operates within the boundaries set by the national constitutions and respects the sovereignty of its Member States in matters of law-making.

Submit
11. UNITED KINGDOM This (Public Law) case requires that, because of the European Communities Act 1972, the UK must give priority to EU law. However - if the UK deliberately and expressly repeal the EU law, the courts would be duty-bound to follow the statute. Where ordinary legislation can be impliedly repealed, consitutional legislation must be expressly repealed - but the point is, they can still be repealed.

Explanation

not-available-via-ai

Submit
View My Results

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Jan 23, 2024 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Jan 23, 2024
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • May 07, 2012
    Quiz Created by
    Chriscullen
Cancel
  • All
    All (11)
  • Unanswered
    Unanswered ()
  • Answered
    Answered ()
There are two stances to supremacy, the CJEU stance, which is...
This CJEU case confirms the EU approach - that EU law prevails...
GERMANY...
And the National Constitutional Court Stance is...
TOL ARTICLE 6(2) does what...
There are three national approaches we need to be able to discuss;...
TOL ARTICLE 6(3) does what...
GERMANY...
TOL ARTICLE 6(1) does what...
Here's a good point to focus on the Treaty of Lisbon......
UNITED KINGDOM...
Alert!

Advertisement