Defensive Tactics Test
-
Any person is justified in using any force to defend themselves from bodily harm
-
True
-
False
-
The 'Defensive Tactics Test' assesses knowledge of legal justifications for using force in self-defense and law enforcement scenarios. It explores conditions under which both non-deadly and deadly force are permissible, enhancing understanding crucial for security and law enforcement professionals.
(297).jpg "Defensive Tactics Test - Quiz")
Quiz Preview
- 2.
A person is justified in using force, other than deadly force, against another when and to the extent that he believes that force is necessary to prevent or terminate criminal interference with real property or personal property
-
Lawfully in his possession
-
Lawfully in the possession of a member of his immediate family
-
Belonging to a person whose property he has a legal duty to protect
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
A person is justified in using force, other than deadly force, against another when and to the extent that he believes that force is necessary to prevent or terminate criminal interference with real property or personal property lawfully in his possession, lawfully in the possession of a member of his immediate family, or belonging to a person whose property he has a legal duty to protect. This means that if any of these conditions are met, the person is justified in using force to protect the property in question. Therefore, the correct answer is "all of the above."Rate this question:
-
- 3.
In Utah, if feasible, a warning shot should be given prior to the use of deadly force
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. FalseExplanation
In Utah, it is not required or recommended to give a warning shot prior to the use of deadly force. This means that if a situation arises where deadly force is necessary for self-defense or protection, individuals in Utah are not obligated to give a warning shot before using such force.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
A peace officer, when affecting the arrest of for a felony auto theft only, may use deadly force to prevent the person’s escape
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. FalseExplanation
The given statement is false. A peace officer cannot use deadly force to prevent the escape of a person arrested for felony auto theft only. The use of deadly force is generally allowed only when there is a threat of serious bodily harm or death to the officer or others. In situations where the offense is non-violent, the use of deadly force is not justified.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
An officer is justified in using deadly force to prevent an escape when
-
He has PC to believe the suspect has committed a felony offense involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death or serious bodily injury
-
The suspect poses a threat of death or serious bodily injury if apprehension is delayed
-
The suspect owns a firearm
-
A and b only
Correct Answer
A. A and b onlyExplanation
An officer is justified in using deadly force to prevent an escape when the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a felony offense involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death or serious bodily injury, and when the suspect poses a threat of death or serious bodily injury if apprehension is delayed. The fact that the suspect owns a firearm is not mentioned as a justification for the use of deadly force. Therefore, the correct answer is a and b only.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
The use of deadly force may be employed to prevent death or serious bodily injury.
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
The statement is true because the use of deadly force is justified in situations where it is necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury. In such circumstances, individuals may use force that is likely to cause death or serious harm to protect themselves or others from imminent danger. This principle is often applied in self-defense cases or situations involving law enforcement officers who need to protect themselves or the public from immediate harm.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
The U.S. Supreme court case Graham V. Conner defines the standard under which excessive force claims will be judged as
-
Reasonable objectivness
-
Conjunctive reasonableness
-
Objective reasonableness
-
Objective reality
Correct Answer
A. Objective reasonablenessExplanation
The correct answer is "objective reasonableness." The U.S. Supreme Court case Graham v. Conner established the standard for evaluating excessive force claims by law enforcement officers. This standard requires determining whether the officer's actions were objectively reasonable given the circumstances, rather than subjectively evaluating the officer's intentions or motivations. This means that the court will assess whether a reasonable officer in the same situation would have acted similarly, considering the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
A sign a person is planning to attack an officer may be
-
Ignoring the officer
-
Emotional venting
-
Repetitive questioning
-
Hiding
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
All of the mentioned behaviors - ignoring the officer, emotional venting, repetitive questioning, and hiding - can be signs that a person is planning to attack an officer. Ignoring the officer may indicate a lack of respect or a disregard for authority. Emotional venting could be a way for the person to release their frustration or anger before carrying out an attack. Repetitive questioning may be a tactic to distract or gather information about the officer's vulnerabilities. Hiding suggests that the person may be planning to ambush or surprise the officer. Therefore, all of these behaviors can indicate a potential threat.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
When searching a suspect it should be done by a member of the same sex when reasonable and feasible. If a member of the same sex is not available, there should be two officers present during the search and it should be documented in your report
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
The explanation for the given correct answer is that when searching a suspect, it is generally considered appropriate and respectful to have a member of the same sex conduct the search, if reasonable and feasible. This is to ensure the privacy and dignity of the individual being searched. However, if a member of the same sex is not available, it is important to have two officers present during the search to maintain transparency and prevent any potential misconduct. Documenting the search in the report helps create a record and ensure accountability.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
The three cuffing positions are
-
Standing
-
High profile
-
Kneeling
-
Low profile
-
Prone
Correct Answer(s)
A. Standing
A. Kneeling
A. ProneExplanation
The question is asking for the three cuffing positions. The correct answer is standing, kneeling, and prone. These positions refer to different ways in which a person can be restrained or handcuffed. The standing position involves the person being handcuffed while standing up. The kneeling position involves the person being handcuffed while kneeling down. The prone position involves the person being handcuffed while lying face-down on the ground. These positions are commonly used in law enforcement or security situations to safely and effectively restrain individuals.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
The ten deadly errors have cost many officers there lives, some of them are
-
Missing the danger signs, taking a bad position, asleep/sleepy on the job
-
Failure to watch the hands, relaxing to soon, poor search or no search
-
Escape routes, footing, cover and/or concealment
-
All of the above
-
A and b only
Correct Answer
A. A and b onlyExplanation
The correct answer is "a and b only." This means that the officers have made mistakes such as missing danger signs, taking a bad position, being asleep or sleepy on the job, failing to watch the hands, and relaxing too soon. However, poor search or no search, lack of knowledge about escape routes, footing, cover, and concealment are not included in the errors that have cost officers their lives.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
Which are not principles of defensive tactics
-
Distance
-
Balanced stance
-
Self control
-
Awareness
-
Wide stance, gun side away
Correct Answer
A. Wide stance, gun side awayExplanation
The principles of defensive tactics involve maintaining a balanced stance, maintaining self-control, and being aware of one's surroundings. These principles are essential for effectively defending oneself in a potentially dangerous situation. However, the wide stance with the gun side away is not a principle of defensive tactics. This stance may leave the individual vulnerable and make it difficult to respond quickly and efficiently.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
If a person being arrested _______ __ ________ , it means that they are trying to escape or resist the arrest.
-
Flees or forcibly runs or fights
-
Panic or cries for help
-
Pees or poops
-
Screams or yells
Correct Answer
A. Flees or forcibly runs or fightsExplanation
When a person is being arrested, if they "flee" or "forcibly run or fight," it means that they are trying to escape or resist the arrest. This behavior is considered illegal and can lead to additional charges.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
Resists after being _________ __ ___ _______to make the arrest,
-
Informed of the intention
-
Told of the desire
-
Informed of the irritation
-
Told of the intention
Correct Answer
A. Informed of the intentionExplanation
The correct answer is "informed of the intention." This means that the person resists after being informed or made aware of someone's intention to make an arrest. The phrase "informed of the intention" suggests that the person is aware of the plans to arrest them, which may cause them to resist or oppose the arrest.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
The person arresting may use ________ _____ to effect the arrest.
-
Reasonable force
-
Any force
-
Objectively reasonable force
-
Any force, except deadly force
Correct Answer
A. Reasonable forceExplanation
The person arresting may use reasonable force to effect the arrest. This means that they can use the amount of force that is necessary and proportionate to apprehend the individual without causing excessive harm or injury. It allows for the use of force to control the situation and ensure compliance, but it should be done in a reasonable and justified manner. The use of deadly force is not permitted unless there is an immediate threat to the safety of the arresting person or others involved.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
Deadly force may be used only as provided in section _______
-
76-2-404
-
76-4-202
-
77-7-7
-
76-4-402
Correct Answer
A. 76-2-404Explanation
The correct answer is 76-2-404 because this section specifically addresses the use of deadly force. It outlines the circumstances under which deadly force may be used and provides guidelines for law enforcement officers and individuals in self-defense situations. It is important to refer to this section to understand the legal parameters and limitations surrounding the use of deadly force.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
When engaged in an use of force you should use verbal commands
-
Before the use of force, if feasible
-
During the use of force
-
After the use of force
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
In situations where force is necessary, it is important to use verbal commands before, during, and after the use of force if possible. Before using force, verbal commands can be used to try to de-escalate the situation and give the individual an opportunity to comply without physical force. During the use of force, verbal commands can help to control and direct the situation, ensuring that the force applied is necessary and proportionate. After the use of force, verbal commands can be used to maintain control and ensure the safety of all involved parties. Using verbal commands throughout the entire process helps to ensure effective communication and minimize the risk of unnecessary harm.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
Some of the reasons a person may use kneeling cuffing position may be
-
The person is physically unable to lay down
-
The person kneels because of environmental considerations
-
The person is bigger than the officer
-
The person is smaller than the officer
-
A, b, and c
Correct Answer
A. A, b, and cExplanation
The kneeling cuffing position may be used by a person who is physically unable to lay down, such as due to a medical condition or injury. It may also be used due to environmental considerations, such as being in a confined space where laying down is not possible. Additionally, the person may kneel if they are bigger or smaller than the officer, as this position may provide better control and safety during the cuffing process. Therefore, options a, b, and c are all valid reasons for using the kneeling cuffing position.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
All altercations end up on the ground in some form or another
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. TrueExplanation
This statement is true because altercations generally involve physical aggression or confrontation, which often leads to individuals ending up on the ground in some way. Whether it is due to being pushed, tackled, or falling during a fight, the physical nature of altercations often results in individuals ending up on the ground. Therefore, it can be concluded that all altercations end up on the ground in some form or another.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
Some of the reasons for a systematic search are
-
Psychological control
-
Less chance of missing weapons
-
Find weapons more quickly
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
A systematic search is necessary for several reasons. Firstly, it provides psychological control as it ensures that every area is thoroughly searched, leaving no room for uncertainty. Secondly, a systematic search reduces the chance of missing weapons, as it follows a structured approach that covers all possible hiding spots. Lastly, it allows for weapons to be found more quickly, as the search is organized and efficient. Therefore, the correct answer is "all of the above".Rate this question:
-
- 21.
Some indications that a person may try to take an officers weapon are
-
Looking at the weapon
-
Looking around for potential witnesses
-
Closing the distance between himself and the officer
-
Looking around for people that may come to the officers aid
-
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. All of the aboveExplanation
The correct answer is "all of the above". This means that all of the mentioned indications (looking at the weapon, looking around for potential witnesses, closing the distance between himself and the officer, looking around for people that may come to the officers aid) are signs that a person may try to take an officer's weapon. These behaviors suggest that the person is potentially planning to disarm the officer and pose a threat.Rate this question:
-
- 22.
In regards to you weapon it is
-
Imperative that you keep your gun side away from the suspect at all times
-
A good idea to keep your gun side away if possible
-
Impossible to keep your gun side away at all times
-
All of the above
-
B and c only
Correct Answer
A. B and c onlyExplanation
Keeping your gun side away from the suspect is a good idea because it helps to maintain distance and reduce the risk of the suspect gaining control of your weapon. However, it may not always be possible to keep your gun side away at all times, especially in dynamic and unpredictable situations. Therefore, the correct answer is b and c only, as it acknowledges that it is a good idea to keep your gun side away if possible, but it is impossible to do so at all times.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Oct 25, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Oct 25, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Nov 14, 2009Quiz Created by
Gatnnos
Back to top