Chapter 5 Open Note Quiz Over Reading Notes And Vocabulary
-
Basic freedoms that are guaranteed under the Constitution, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion. these rights are protections from governmental intrusion or abuse.
-
Civil rights
-
Civil liberties
-
Libel
-
Slander
-
About This Quiz
This Chapter 5 Open Note Quiz tests understanding of key constitutional concepts, including civil liberties, rights, and legal protections. It assesses knowledge of civil rights, libel, slander, double jeopardy, and the incorporation process, crucial for grasping the protections and guarantees provided by the U. S. Constitution.
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Publishing false information about someone with intent to cause harm.
-
Libel
-
Slander
-
Prior restraint
-
Self-incrimination
Correct Answer
A. LibelExplanation
Libel refers to the act of publishing false information about someone with the intention to cause harm. Unlike slander, which involves spoken false statements, libel specifically pertains to written or printed defamatory statements. Prior restraint refers to the government's censorship or restriction of speech before it is expressed, while self-incrimination relates to an individual being forced to testify against themselves in a criminal case.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
Orally spreading false information about someone with intent to cause harm.
-
Libel
-
Prior restraint
-
Slander
-
Double jeopardy
Correct Answer
A. SlanderExplanation
Slander refers to the act of orally spreading false information about someone with the intention to cause harm. Unlike libel, which involves written or printed false statements, slander specifically pertains to spoken defamation. It is important to note that slander is a civil offense, meaning that the harmed individual can seek compensation for the damage caused by the false statements.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
The prosecution of a person a second time for a crime which the defendant has already been tried once and found not guilty. ____________________ is prohibited under the Fifth Amendment.
-
Self-incrimination
-
Libel
-
Slander
-
Double jeopardy
Correct Answer
A. Double jeopardyExplanation
The correct answer is "double jeopardy." Double jeopardy refers to the legal principle that protects individuals from being prosecuted twice for the same offense after they have already been acquitted. This protection is guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. It ensures that individuals are not subjected to multiple trials and potential punishment for the same alleged crime, preventing the government from using its power to harass or oppress individuals through repeated prosecutions.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Guarantees of equal rights and equal treatment under the law. Unlike civil liberties, _____________ are not protections from government abuse, but rights that government must provide to its citizens, such as trial by jury and voting rights.
-
Civil rights
-
Civil liberties
-
Libel
-
Slander
Correct Answer
A. Civil rightsExplanation
Civil rights are guarantees of equal rights and equal treatment under the law. Unlike civil liberties, which protect individuals from government abuse, civil rights are rights that the government must provide to its citizens, such as trial by jury and voting rights.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
The process by which the Supreme Court applies the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
-
Prior restraint
-
Libel
-
Incorporation
-
Self-incrimination
Correct Answer
A. IncorporationExplanation
Incorporation refers to the process by which the Supreme Court applies the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial, are extended to individuals at the state level, ensuring that their rights are protected regardless of which state they reside in. Incorporation is an important aspect of ensuring constitutional rights are upheld uniformly across the United States.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
An attempt by government to prevent the publication or broadcast of material considered harmful.
-
Incorporation
-
Prior restraint
-
Libel
-
Slander
Correct Answer
A. Prior restraintExplanation
Prior restraint refers to the government's effort to prevent the publication or broadcast of material that is deemed harmful. This can include censorship or restrictions on freedom of speech and press. It is a mechanism used by the government to control the dissemination of information and limit the potential harm that certain content may cause. Prior restraint is often seen as a violation of freedom of expression and is typically subject to legal scrutiny to ensure it is justified and necessary.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Statements, usually made under oath, suggesting that the person speaking is guilty of a crime.
-
Civil rights
-
Civil liberties
-
Double jeopardy
-
Self-incrimination
Correct Answer
A. Self-incriminationExplanation
Self-incrimination refers to the act of making statements, often under oath, that suggest the person speaking is guilty of a crime. This concept is closely tied to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from being compelled to testify against themselves in criminal cases. By choosing to remain silent or not answer certain questions, individuals can exercise their right against self-incrimination. This principle is essential in safeguarding the rights of individuals and ensuring a fair legal process.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
In your warmup for Tuesday, March 20th you were asked the five basic freedoms protected by the 1st amendment. Which one of these is NOT a freedom you listed?
-
Speech
-
Religion
-
Bearing of arms
-
Press
Correct Answer
A. Bearing of armsExplanation
The correct answer is "bearing of arms" because it is not one of the five basic freedoms protected by the 1st amendment. The 1st amendment guarantees the freedoms of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. "Bearing of arms" is protected by the 2nd amendment, which grants the right to bear arms.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
Chapter 5 Section 2 Reading Notes: You were asked to compare the difference between civil liberties and civil __________
-
Rights
-
Laws
-
Liberties
-
Issues
Correct Answer
A. RightsExplanation
In Chapter 5 Section 2 Reading Notes, the question asks for a comparison between civil liberties and civil rights. Civil liberties refer to the individual freedoms and rights protected by the Constitution, such as freedom of speech and religion. On the other hand, civil rights are the rights that guarantee equal treatment and protection under the law, such as the right to vote and the right to be free from discrimination. Therefore, the correct answer is "rights" as it accurately distinguishes between civil liberties and civil rights.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
Chapter 5, Section 2 Reading Notes: Gitlow versus New York held that -
-
The due process clause extended the bill of rights to the states
-
Made the Supremacy clause null and void
-
Extended the Commerce clause to the states
-
Made the Constitution obsolete in terms of a bill of rights
Correct Answer
A. The due process clause extended the bill of rights to the statesExplanation
Gitlow versus New York was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extended the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states. This decision established the incorporation doctrine, which means that the states are also bound to protect individuals' fundamental rights as outlined in the Bill of Rights. This ruling significantly expanded the reach of the federal government and ensured that individuals' rights would be protected at both the state and federal levels.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
Chapter 5, Section 2 Notes: The role of the Supreme court today is to
-
Try state cases
-
Hear original evidence in all cases
-
Enforce the laws
-
Interpret the law and oversee the lower courts decisions
Correct Answer
A. Interpret the law and oversee the lower courts decisionsExplanation
The correct answer is "interpret the law and oversee the lower courts decisions." The role of the Supreme Court today is to interpret the law, which means they analyze and explain the meaning of laws to ensure they are applied correctly. Additionally, the Supreme Court has the authority to review and oversee the decisions made by lower courts, ensuring that they are in line with the Constitution and applicable laws. This allows the Supreme Court to maintain consistency and fairness in the judicial system.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
Which amendment of the bill of rights deals with excessive bail?
-
1st
-
2nd
-
7th
-
8th
Correct Answer
A. 8thExplanation
The correct answer is the 8th amendment. This amendment of the bill of rights deals with excessive bail. It prohibits the government from imposing excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishments. The 8th amendment ensures that individuals are not subjected to unfair or excessive bail amounts, which could infringe upon their rights and hinder their ability to obtain release from custody.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
This was the case mentioned in your matrix that dealt with the 10th amendment
-
Gitlow vs. New York
-
Miranda vs. Arizona
-
United States vs. Morrison
-
Gideon vs. Wainwright
Correct Answer
A. United States vs. MorrisonExplanation
The correct answer is United States vs. Morrison. This case dealt with the 10th amendment, which is a part of the United States Constitution that reserves powers to the states that are not explicitly granted to the federal government. In United States vs. Morrison, the Supreme Court ruled that a provision of the Violence Against Women Act exceeded Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and the 10th amendment, as it attempted to regulate non-economic, violent criminal conduct solely on the basis that it had an attenuated effect on interstate commerce.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
In your matrix there was a court case referencing the 7th amendment - trial by jury in civil suits
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. FalseExplanation
The explanation for the answer "False" is that the 7th amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a trial by jury in civil suits involving a dispute over $20 or more. However, the statement in the question suggests that there was a court case referencing the 7th amendment, which does not necessarily mean that the case involved a trial by jury. Therefore, the answer is false as the statement does not explicitly state that the court case involved a trial by jury.Rate this question:
-
- 16.
According to your matrix, the following cases all have to do with which amendment? 1.) Engel vs. Vitale 2.) Lemon vs. Kutzman 3.) Texas vs. Johnson
-
8th
-
1st
-
2nd
-
3rd
Correct Answer
A. 1stExplanation
The cases mentioned, Engel vs. Vitale, Lemon vs. Kutzman, and Texas vs. Johnson, all relate to the 1st Amendment. The 1st Amendment protects the freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. Engel vs. Vitale involved the issue of prayer in public schools, Lemon vs. Kutzman established a three-pronged test for determining if government actions violate the Establishment Clause, and Texas vs. Johnson dealt with the burning of the American flag as a form of political expression, which was protected under the 1st Amendment.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
According to your matrix the right to not incriminate oneself and the right to not be put in double jeopardy is protected by what amendment?
-
1st
-
3rd
-
5th
-
7th
Correct Answer
A. 5thExplanation
The correct answer is the 5th amendment because it protects the right to not incriminate oneself and the right to not be put in double jeopardy. This amendment ensures that individuals cannot be forced to testify against themselves in criminal cases and that they cannot be tried twice for the same offense.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
According to your matrix the following cases had to do with which amendment? 1.) Katz vs. Ohio 2.) Terry vs. Ohio
-
3rd
-
2nd
-
1st
-
4th
Correct Answer
A. 4thExplanation
The correct answer is 4th. The cases mentioned, Katz vs. Ohio and Terry vs. Ohio, both relate to the 4th amendment. The 4th amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures and requires that search warrants be supported by probable cause. In Katz vs. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required to wiretap a public telephone booth, extending the protections of the 4th amendment to electronic communications. In Terry vs. Ohio, the Court established the "stop and frisk" exception to the 4th amendment, allowing police officers to conduct limited searches without a warrant in certain circumstances.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
According to your matrix, the case of Miranda vs. Arizona dealt with which amendment?
-
4th
-
3rd
-
2nd
-
5th
Correct Answer
A. 5thExplanation
The case of Miranda vs. Arizona dealt with the 5th amendment. This amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination and ensures due process of law. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals must be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present during police interrogations. This landmark case established the "Miranda rights" that are now read to individuals upon arrest.Rate this question:
-
- 20.
What were you supposed to do in the 4th column of your matrix?
-
Describe the rights protected by the amendment
-
Make an illustration
-
Write down the supreme court case that established precedent for the rights protected
-
Read the amendment
Correct Answer
A. Make an illustrationExplanation
In the 4th column of the matrix, you were supposed to make an illustration. This means that instead of describing the rights protected by the amendment, writing down the supreme court case that established precedent for the rights protected, or reading the amendment, you were expected to visually represent the information using drawings or images.Rate this question:
-
- 21.
If you are absent for an assignment, what are you supposed to do?
-
Get the notes from a classmate or get them from coach Thompson's binder
-
Don't do the assignment
-
Cheat on the open note quiz
-
Wait until the last minute and then copy half the assignment from someone who did it completely wrong
Correct Answer
A. Get the notes from a classmate or get them from coach Thompson's binderExplanation
If you are absent for an assignment, the suggested course of action is to get the notes from a classmate or obtain them from coach Thompson's binder. This implies that the student should seek assistance from their peers or the teacher to obtain the necessary information and materials to complete the assignment.Rate this question:
-
- 22.
For the preview to this chapter we discussed the rights of the principle or school authorities to search what?
-
The students' homes
-
Teachers' homes
-
Student lockers
-
We didn't discuss searching anything or anybody during the preview
Correct Answer
A. Student lockersExplanation
The question asks about the rights of the principle or school authorities to search something that was discussed in the preview of the chapter. The correct answer is "student lockers" because it is mentioned in the options provided. The question does not mention anything about searching students' homes or teachers' homes, and it also states that there was no discussion about searching anything or anybody during the preview. Therefore, the only option that aligns with the given information is student lockers.Rate this question:
-
- 23.
The number of vocabulary terms you were asked to define was?
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
None of the choices listed here
Correct Answer
A. None of the choices listed here -
- 24.
According to your matrix, how many amendments make up the bill of rights?
-
8
-
9
-
7
-
10
Correct Answer
A. 10Explanation
The bill of rights is made up of 10 amendments. These amendments were added to the United States Constitution to protect individual rights and limit the power of the government. Each amendment addresses a specific aspect of personal freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. Therefore, the correct answer is 10.Rate this question:
-
- 25.
According to your matrix, there are several precedents for the 3rd amendment
-
True
-
False
Correct Answer
A. FalseExplanation
The given statement suggests that there are several precedents for the 3rd amendment according to the matrix. However, the answer is false, which means that there are no precedents for the 3rd amendment according to the matrix.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 14, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 14, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Mar 27, 2012Quiz Created by
Bthomp022304
Back to top