GRE Analytical Writing Transition Words and Connectives Quiz

The word "Consequently" indicates that the conclusions being questionable is a direct result of the flawed methodology revealed in the study. It effectively establishes a cause-and-effect relationship, emphasizing that one event led to the other. This transition word clarifies the logical connection between the study's findings and their implications.

"Nevertheless" is used to introduce a contrasting idea, highlighting that despite the proposal being cost-effective, it still had significant drawbacks regarding feasibility. This connective effectively signals a shift in perspective, indicating that the positive aspect does not negate the negative one.

The word "Still" effectively indicates a contrast between the initial presentation of evidence and the subsequent failure to address counterarguments. It emphasizes that despite the evidence provided, a significant flaw remains in the argument, highlighting the ongoing relevance of the counterarguments. This creates a cohesive logical flow in the statement.

"In fact" is used to introduce additional information that reinforces or emphasizes a previous statement. In this context, it highlights that not only does the data support the hypothesis, but there is also further validation from multiple studies, strengthening the overall argument.

"Specifically" is used to introduce precise examples or details that support a broader statement. In this context, it effectively leads into the mention of recent experiments, reinforcing the claim that the theory is compelling by providing concrete evidence that validates its core principles.

The phrase "As a result" indicates a logical consequence or outcome stemming from the previous statement. In this context, the significant reduction in the budget directly led to the department's decision to eliminate key programs, demonstrating a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

"Granted" is used to acknowledge a valid point while simultaneously introducing a contrasting idea. In this context, it concedes that the argument has merit but highlights that it fails to consider important economic factors, thus effectively restating the main point of criticism.

"Likewise" is used to indicate that the second study's conclusions are similar to those of the first study. It emphasizes a parallel relationship between the findings of both studies, suggesting that both reached significant and comparable results. This connective effectively links the two statements in a cohesive manner.

"That is" effectively signals that what follows will clarify or elaborate on the preceding statement. In this context, it introduces the stakeholders' concerns about the implementation timeline, providing a direct explanation related to the criticism of the policy. This transition helps the reader understand the connection between the criticism and the stakeholders' questioning.

The word "subsequently" indicates that the revised version gained approval after the initial proposal was rejected, establishing a clear temporal sequence. It highlights that one event followed another in time, making it the appropriate choice for conveying the order of occurrences in this context.

"Conversely" effectively introduces an alternative viewpoint, indicating a contrast between critics' negative assessment and proponents' defense of the model. This connective signals that the following statement will present a perspective that opposes the previous one, highlighting the debate surrounding the model's validity.

"Indeed" serves to emphasize the statement that follows, reinforcing the significance of the evidence. It indicates that the change in understanding is not just noteworthy but is fundamentally important, enhancing the impact of the assertion made about the evidence.