Supreme Court Cases/amendments

The Tinker vs. Des Moines case upheld the students' 1st Amendment rights, specifically the freedom of speech.

In the case of Engel vs. Vitale, the Supreme Court ruled the required prayer in schools unconstitutional due to its religious nature violating the 1st Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court ruled that Johnson's flag-burning was protected symbolic speech under the 1st Amendment.

The Supreme Court decision in the Furman vs. Georgia case resulted in the order for states to reformulate their death penalty laws due to the racial imbalances in the use of death sentences.

Although the Court upheld the military order in Korematsu vs. United States, they emphasized that racial antagonism could not be a legitimate basis for restriction. The incorrect answers provided various incorrect conclusions that did not align with the actual outcome of the case.

In this case, the Courts sided with the school officials, stating that they had the authority to regulate the content of school-sponsored activities.

In the New Jersey vs. TLO case, the Supreme Court ruled that schools can conduct searches of students if there is reasonable cause to believe that a school rule has been violated. This decision was made to ensure a safe and conducive learning environment within schools.

The 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution protects various freedoms from government interference or suppression.

The 3rd Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from quartering soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, except as prescribed by law during times of war.

The 4th Amendment specifically protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring that individuals have the right to privacy in their homes, as well as safeguarding their personal papers and belongings.

The 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides important protections for individuals accused of crimes, ensuring due process and preventing double jeopardy. It also prohibits the government from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without following the law.

The 6th Amendment grants various rights to an accused person, including the right to a speedy and public trial with an impartial jury in the state where the alleged offense was committed. It does not give the accused person the right to self-representation, a private trial, or the ability to choose the trial location.

The 7th Amendment specifically deals with the right to a trial by jury in civil cases involving significant amounts of money.

The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution specifically prohibits excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishments. This amendment ensures that individuals are not subjected to unjust treatment by the legal system.

The 9th Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to ensure that individuals' rights were not limited to only those listed in the Constitution. It acknowledges that there are additional rights that belong to the people beyond those explicitly mentioned.

The 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution reserves all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government to the states or the people, emphasizing a decentralized form of government.

The 11th Amendment to the United States Constitution specifically prohibits lawsuits against states in federal court by residents of another state or of a foreign country, thereby protecting states from certain legal actions.

The 12th Amendment outlines the process for electing the president and vice president through the Electoral College system in the United States.

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime. It was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the required number of states on December 6, 1865.

The 14th Amendment primarily deals with citizenship rights and equal protection under the law, not specifically the age or selection criteria for representatives, oaths of office, or financial matters related to former slave owners.

The correct answer is that the court declared the statute un-Constitutional and established the concept of Judicial Review. This case is significant in U.S. history as it solidified the power of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution and strike down laws deemed unconstitutional.

In the case of McCulloch vs. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that Maryland's attempt to impede the Second Bank of the United States was unconstitutional, as it interfered with the Federal government's exercise of its powers. The court invoked the Necessary and Proper Clause to uphold the Federal government's authority over state actions.

In the case of Gibbons vs. Ogden, Daniel Webster argued on behalf of Thomas Gibbons, while multiple attorneys argued for Aaron Ogden. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of Gibbons based on the interpretations of interstate commerce and the Supremacy Clause.

In the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson, the Supreme Court's decision was that segregation was permitted if facilities were equal. This decision established the 'separate but equal' doctrine and had a significant impact on the civil rights movement in the United States.

The correct answer highlights the key issue of segregation being a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, which was the basis for the Court's decision in the case.

In Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the woman's right to choose, granting her the decision on whether to terminate the pregnancy based on the fundamental right to privacy.

In Mapp vs. Ohio, the judges ruled in favor of the woman, stating that evidence gained through illegal searches must be excluded to protect against unreasonable searches and violations of constitutional rights.

The correct answer is Miranda Rights, which are the rights that must be read to a suspect before questioning by law enforcement. These rights include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the statement that anything the suspect says can be used against them in court.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Gideon vs. Wainwright granted Gideon a new trial and he was found not guilty with the help of an attorney, which led to the re-establishment of the guarantee of counsel for all poor persons facing felony charges.