Absolute and Participial Phrases Lesson: Definition, Common Mistakes, and Differences

Created by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process

Lesson Overview

Absolute and participial phrases are essential elements of English grammar, adding depth and clarity to writing. While they may appear similar at first glance, they serve different functions within a sentence. A clear understanding of these structures not only enhances reading comprehension but also improves sentence variety and fluency in writing.

What Is a Participial Phrase?

Participial phrases (also called participial clauses) are groups of words that begin with a participle (the -ing form of a verb for present participles, or the -ed/ -en form for past participles) and function as adjectives in a sentence​.

In simpler terms, a participial phrase adds description to a noun or pronoun. It doesn't have its own new subject; instead, it refers to an existing noun in the main clause (usually the subject).

  • Present participial phrase: starts with an -ing verb (e.g. running, smiling, having, gone).
  • Past participial phrase: starts with a past participle (often -ed for regular verbs, or an irregular form like broken, given, seen).

How Participial Phrases Work?

Because participial phrases act like adjectives, they must be placed next to the noun they describe. Often, they come at the beginning of a sentence, describing the subject. They can also come after the noun they modify or at the end of a sentence, as long as it's clear which noun they're describing.

Examples of Participial Phrases:

  • Sitting quietly, the woman read her book.
    (The phrase "Sitting quietly" describes the woman, the subject.)
  • The woman, sitting quietly and occasionally sipping tea, read her book.​
    (The participial phrase in commas adds non-essential detail about "the woman.")
  • Enraged by the judge's decision, Larry shouted an obscenity.​
    ("Enraged by the judge's decision" describes Larry, explaining his emotional state.)
  • The plate, broken in two, could not be repaired.
    ("Broken in two" describes the plate.)
  • Peter and Amit huddled in the bus shelter, soaked to the skin from the heavy downpour.​
    (The phrase after the comma describes Peter and Amit.)

In each case, the participial phrase gives more information about a noun. If you removed the participial phrase, the core sentence still stands (just less descriptive).

Essential vs. Non-essential Participial Phrases

  • Non-essential participial phrases are set off with commas, as in the examples above​. You can remove them without changing the basic meaning of the sentence.
  • Essential participial phrases (necessary to identify which noun we're talking about) are not set off with commas. For example: The man wearing a red hat is my uncle. Here the phrase "wearing a red hat" specifies which man; it's essential information, so no comma is used.

Common Mistake: Dangling Participles

One of the biggest challenges with participial phrases is avoiding the dreaded dangling participle (also known as a dangling modifier). This error happens when the participial phrase doesn't clearly attach to the right noun, often because the intended noun isn't actually in the sentence or isn't placed immediately after the phrase.

For instance, look at this faulty sentence:

  • Driving to school, the rain drenched my clothes.

The way this is written, the participial phrase "Driving to school" is describing "the rain" – which doesn't make sense (rain can't drive). The intended meaning was likely that I was driving. To fix it, the subject should be the driver:

  • Driving to school, I got my clothes drenched by the rain. (Now "I" is the one driving, which makes sense.)

Rule of thumb: The noun that the participial phrase describes should immediately follow the comma

If not, your reader might get confused or amused by a dangling modifier. Some unintentionally funny examples:

  • Rumbling like a freight train, I heard my belly announce its emptiness. (Wrong – it sounds like I am rumbling! The phrase should describe "belly.")​
  • Banned in seven states, the book sold out at the store. (Wrong – it sounds like the store was banned. It should describe "the book.")​

What Is an Absolute Phrase?

Now let's talk about absolute phrases (also known as absolute constructions or nominative absolutes). An absolute phrase is a group of words that consists of a noun or pronoun + a modifier, usually a participle or adjective, with no conjunction connecting it to the rest of the sentence​.

Absolute phrases do not act as a typical part of speech (not directly as an adjective, adverb, etc. to a single word); instead, they add information to the whole sentence or situation.

In plainer language, an absolute phrase is like a sentence fragment that provides extra context. It often looks like a full sentence with the verb "to be" missing​. Because of this, an absolute phrase can often be transformed into a full clause by adding a form of "to be" (was, were). Absolute phrases are always set off by commas (or dashes) because they are parenthetical – they are attached to a sentence but not grammatically integrated into it​.

Examples of Absolute Phrases:

  • Weather permitting, the conference will be held as planned.​
    (Meaning: If weather is permitting... "Weather permitting" is a shorthand absolute phrase for "if the weather permits.")
  • The chapter completed, I returned to my duties.​
    (Meaning: The chapter was completed, so I returned to my duties.)
  • Her coat flapping in the wind, Amy shivered.​
    ("Her coat was flapping in the wind" – gives a visual detail as context while Amy shivered.)
  • They reached the summit, their legs burning with pain from the arduous climb.​
    (Meaning: their legs were burning with pain – describing the condition of "their legs" at that time.)
  • Engine revving, the car waited at the lights.​
    ("Engine was revving" describes the car's state.)
  • With his reputation on the line, he agreed to the risky plan.
    (This absolute phrase begins with "with" + noun + phrase. It adds the condition or circumstance.)
  • His face red, he stumbled over his words during the speech.
    (Implied: His face was red – the redness of his face is a detail about the situation.)

In each case, the absolute phrase provides extra information: a condition, a detail, or a background circumstance under which the main action occurs. It often answers questions like when, why, or how something in the main clause happened. For example, "Her coat flapping in the wind, Amy shivered." Why did Amy shiver? Perhaps because her coat was flapping in the cold wind (implying it's windy/chilly).

Different Forms of Absolute Phrases

While a classic absolute phrase is often noun + participle (+ modifiers), there are other configurations possible (which sometimes confuses students). Essentially, any noun + descriptive phrase that doesn't directly tie into the main sentence can function as an absolute. For example:

  • Noun + Participle: The game over, the players shook hands. (Implied: The game being over…)
  • Noun + Adjective: His arms stiff, he slowly lowered the heavy box. (Implied: His arms were stiff.)​​
  • Noun + Prepositional Phrase: Dagger in hand, the knight stepped forward.​ (Similar to: With a dagger in his hand.)
  • Noun + Infinitive: The fourth one to be released in 2025, the film series continues the saga.​ (Implied: The fourth one is going to be released…)
  • With/Without + Noun + …: With his homework finally done, John relaxed for the evening.​ (This is essentially a variation of an absolute phrase starting with "with.")

Understanding the Function of Absolute Phrases

A helpful way to understand absolute phrases is to see them as zooming in on a detail or setting a scene. One English teacher explains to students that some absolute phrases "zoom in" on part of a noun in the main clause​.

For example, "The men, huge bags piled on their backs, walked with labored steps." The absolute phrase zooms in on what the men are carrying (huge bags on their backs), providing a vivid detail. Other absolute phrases give a more general background for the entire sentence​.

You can think of an absolute phrase as a mini-sentence that's been attached to the main sentence. It doesn't modify a specific single word in the main clause, it modifies (or adds to) the entire clause.

In fact, one way people remember the term "absolute" is that it has "absolutely" no direct grammatical connection (like conjunction or dependency) to the rest of the sentence. (In reality, the absolute phrase does relate in meaning to the main clause – it's not random; but grammatically it stands apart.)

If at the beginning of a sentence, put a comma after the phrase. If in the middle of a sentence, put a comma before and after. If at the end, put a comma before the phrase. For example:

  • Beginning: Her arms folded across her chest, she stood waiting for me. (Absolute phrase at start, followed by comma.)

  • Middle: The athlete, his energy completely spent, collapsed at the finish line. (Absolute in the middle, surrounded by commas.)

  • End: We sat by the fireplace, our toes toasty warm. (Absolute at end, preceded by comma.)

Participial vs. Absolute Phrases: Key Differences

By now you might notice some overlap between participial and absolute phrases – they both can involve -ing or -ed verbs and add description. But they serve different roles in a sentence.

Here's a handy comparison table to summarize:

FeatureParticipial PhraseAbsolute Phrase
Contains its own subject?No. It has no new subject; it refers to an existing noun in the main clause. The phrase often begins directly with a participle (e.g. Running down the street,…)​.Yes. It has a noun or pronoun at its start – the thing being described in that phrase​. That noun is often not repeated as a noun in the main clause (though it might correspond to something there, like a pronoun referring back).
Grammatical structureParticiple + objects/modifiers, forming an adjective phrase. It must attach to a noun in the sentence (usually right next to it). It's essentially a descriptive clause without a conjunction.Noun/pronoun + participle (or adjective/phrase) + modifiers. It often looks like a clause missing "to be." It's grammatically independent – not joined by conjunction, not inserted into main clause grammar​.
FunctionActs as an adjective, describing or clarifying a noun or pronoun in the sentence​. Provides extra detail about that noun (what it's doing, what it's like, etc.).Modifies the whole sentence/clause, or provides a background condition/reason​. It does not function as an adjective for a single word nor as a main clause element. Think of it as giving a side-note about the circumstances.
PunctuationIf at the beginning of a sentence, set it off with a comma after the phrase. If in the middle or end and it's non-essential, use a comma(s) as well​. (Essential ones aren't set off by commas.) The participial phrase should be adjacent to the noun it modifies to avoid dangling.Always separated by a comma or a pair of commas. (or sometimes a dash) because it's a parenthetical element. If it opens the sentence, put a comma after it​. If it interrupts or ends the sentence, use a comma before (and after, if in middle).
Relation to main clauseDirectly tied to a noun in main clause (should directly precede or follow that noun). It's part of the same clause in terms of meaning (though set off by punctuation if non-essential). Removing it leaves a complete sentence.No direct grammatical tie (hence "absolute"). Often expresses cause, time, or condition relative to main clause. The main clause + absolute phrase are logically related, but the absolute is not a required part of the grammar of the main clause​. Removing it leaves the main clause intact and doesn't break grammar.
Simple exampleParticipial: Hoping for a treat, the dog sat patiently. – "Hoping for a treat" describes the dog (no separate subject in phrase; "dog" is doing the hoping).Absolute: The dog sat patiently, its eyes focused on the biscuit. – "its eyes focused on the biscuit" has its own noun "eyes." (Implied: its eyes were focused on the biscuit.) It adds context to how the dog sat.

By checking for a noun at the start of the phrase and seeing what the phrase is doing, you can quickly tell which type you're dealing with. If there's an explicit noun + participle combo, it's likely an absolute phrase; if it starts with a participle describing a noun in the main clause, it's participial. As one educator nicely put it: an absolute phrase is basically like a participial phrase, but with the word it's modifying included at the beginning of the phrase​.

Rate this lesson:

Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.