Home  ›   Blog   ›  Top 7 Mettl Alternatives to Assess Your Candidates in 2024

Top 7 Mettl Alternatives to Assess Your Candidates in 2024

If you’re feeling stuck in a rut when it comes to assessing your candidates using the Mettl assessment tool, I’ve got some fantastic news for you. 

In this blog post, I will be sharing 7 incredible Mettl alternatives or competitors that will take your candidate assessment game to the next level.

Say goodbye to the monotonous and predictable assessments and say hello to a whole new world of assessing your candidates.

Let’s dive right in.

Which Is the Best Mettl Alternative?

Before we dive deeper to know the details of the best Mettl competitors and alternatives, here is a sneak peek at some of the best tools I have used.

ProProfs Quiz Maker

ProProfs Quiz Maker, with its AI support, offers adaptive, customizable employment assessments. You just need to input details like topic and question types, and the tool generates quizzes in just a few seconds. It also contains over a million questions and 100+ templates. Plus, you get automatic scoring and real-time feedback features, enhancing the evaluation process.


eSkill excels in technical assessments with its vast test library catering to many industries. Its customizable tests and detailed reports offer precise insights into candidates’ skills, making it ideal for hiring in IT, engineering, and other technical roles, ensuring informed and accurate recruitment decisions.


Criteria is known for its scientifically backed assessments, offering reliable insights into skills and job performance predictability. The tests cover a wide range of abilities and personality traits, providing a comprehensive candidate profile. Its user-friendly platform and thorough analyses help fine-tune hiring, aligning candidates with job needs and company culture.

List of Best Mettl Alternatives and Competitors

1. ProProfs Quiz Maker

Best for AI-Generated Employment Assessments

As a regular user of ProProfs Quiz Maker, I love its remarkable AI-generated employment assessments. This is one of the free Mettl alternatives with advanced AI algorithms that provide a highly adaptive quiz environment, making it possible to tailor assessments to each candidate’s response pattern. 

All you need to do is add a few details, including the topic name, a bit of detail, types of questions, and whether you need an explanation. With this, the tool can generate quizzes in just a few seconds.

It also contains 100+ quiz templates, which I often customize for different job roles, and 1,000,000+ questions, which I use according to the topic of the quiz. 

The tool also offers automatic scoring and grading features using artificial intelligence and ensures real-time feedback to the candidates according to their performance. 

What Makes ProProfs Quiz Maker a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • ProProfs Quiz Maker excels in AI-driven quiz creation, offering more engaging content. Mettl lacks this AI sophistication in terms of generating quizzes.
  • ProProfs provides extensive customization options, allowing for more creative and engaging quizzes. Mettl offers fewer customization features, which could limit the creativity in quiz design.
  • The platform offers 15+ question types, including hotspot and multimedia questions, which can make quizzes more interactive and engaging. Mettl has fewer question types available.
  • It provides detailed reports and analytics, giving insightful feedback on quiz performance. Mettl also offers reporting features, but they may not be as comprehensive as ProProfs.
  • ProProfs is known for its strong customer support service with various channels like chat, email, and phone support. Mettl’s customer support is not as reliable.
  • While both platforms offer good security measures, ProProfs Quiz Maker provides more robust security features and compliance with industry standards.

Cost: Free plan available. Paid plans start at $20/month.

2. eSkill

Best for Technical Assessments

(Image Source: Software Advice)

In my experience, eSkill has proven to be an invaluable asset for conducting technical assessments. Its comprehensive test library covers a multitude of industries, offering a depth and breadth of technical skill evaluation that I have found unmatched. 

The flexibility to tailor these tests by combining various subjects or creating unique questions aligns perfectly with our needs to assess specific technical competencies. 

What impresses me the most is eSkill’s detailed reporting system. It provides a granular view of each candidate’s skill level, making it easier to make informed hiring decisions. Whether we’re hiring for IT, engineering, or any technical role, eSkill provides a reliable and accurate measure of a candidate’s technical prowess.

What Makes eSkill a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • eSkill provides advanced proctoring features, including live, recorded, and AI-based proctoring, ensuring high test integrity. These are less advanced in Mettl.
  • As compared to Mettl, eSkill consistently updates its test content to ensure relevance with current industry standards and job requirements. 
  • eSkill supports assessments in multiple languages, accommodating a global workforce more effectively, as compared to Mettl, which has limitations in language options.
  • The tool offers unique job simulation tests that mimic real-world job scenarios, providing a practical assessment of candidate skills. This is not so sophisticated in Mettl.
  • eSkill is known for its exceptional customer service, offering comprehensive support and assistance. Against this, Mettl does not provide the same level of support or responsiveness.

Cost: Custom pricing.

3. iMocha

Best for Template-Based Assessments

(Image Source: iMocha)

iMocha has become an integral part of our assessment toolkit, particularly for template-based evaluations. Its extensive library, featuring a wide range of skill sets and job roles, offers unparalleled convenience. 

The ease with which I can select and customize these templates is a major time-saver, especially when working under tight recruitment timelines. The platform’s user-friendly interface and comprehensive result analysis simplify the evaluation process, allowing us to identify candidates who meet our criteria quickly. 

With iMocha, I’ve streamlined the assessment process, ensuring both efficiency and effectiveness in our candidate evaluations.

What Makes iMocha a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • iMocha provides a broader variety of simulation-based questions, adapting better to different job roles and industries, a feature where Mettl’s has very limited support.
  • While both iMocha and Mettl offer a wide range of skills tests, iMocha’s library of over 2,000 skills is more extensive, providing greater coverage and variety.
  • iMocha’s AI-based proctoring technology is known for its advanced features like image, video, and audio monitoring, which are more sophisticated compared to Mettl’s proctoring capabilities.
  • The tool allows highly tailored test creation, which is more flexible and user-friendly compared to Mettl. This level of customization in iMocha enables better alignment with specific job roles and requirements.
  • iMocha provides comprehensive analytics and detailed reporting, which offer deeper insights and more user-friendly data interpretation than Mettl, which has less robust reporting features and analytical tools.

Cost: Starts at $50/user/month.

4. Testinvite

Best for Remote Proctoring

(Image Source: Testinvite)

In the current era of remote work and digital recruitment, Testinvite has been a cornerstone for ensuring the integrity and credibility of our online assessments. Its robust remote proctoring features, such as webcam monitoring, browser lockdown, and real-time proctoring, provide a secure and cheat-proof environment. 

This is crucial in upholding the validity of our assessments, especially when candidates are spread across various locations. Testinvite’s scalability and ease of use suit different assessment scales, from individual tests to mass screening. 

By incorporating Testinvite into our assessment strategy, we have maintained high standards in candidate evaluation, irrespective of their physical location.

What Makes Testinvite a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • Testinvite specializes in mobile-friendly assessments, a feature that is not as good and sophisticated in Mettl.
  • It provides better customization for mobile users compared to Mettl, which is less adaptable for mobile assessments.
  • Testinvite ensures a secure and monitored testing environment. However, users have reported less robust security on Mettl.
  • The tool is scalable for exams of various sizes, unlike Mettl, which is less flexible in this regard.
  • Testinvite has enhanced multilingual support to reach a broader audience. Mettl supports fewer languages and does not have much reach.

Cost: Starts at $37.50/month. Billed annually.

5. Criteria

Best for Scientifically Validated Assessments

(Image Source: Criteria)

Criteria is a standout tool in our hiring process, especially for scientifically validated assessments. The tests, grounded in extensive scientific research, offer a high degree of reliability and validity. This scientific basis gives us confidence that the assessments are not just measuring skills but are also predictive of job performance.

The range of abilities and personality traits that Criteria’s tests cover is impressive, enabling us to gain a holistic view of a candidate’s suitability for a role. 

The platform’s ease of use and in-depth analysis have been pivotal in refining our hiring decisions, helping us identify candidates whose skills and traits align closely with the job requirements and our company culture.

What Makes Criteria a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • Criteria Assessment offers a high degree of customization, allowing organizations to tailor assessments to their specific needs. Mettl has limitations in customization as compared to Criteria.
  • The tool has a strong emphasis on the validity and reliability of its assessments. While Mettl also emphasizes validity and reliability, Criteria has a more extensive validation process.
  • It is known for its user-friendly interface, making it easy for both administrators and test-takers to navigate the platform. This ease of use can lead to higher engagement and acceptance as compared to more complex interfaces like Mettl.
  • Criteria provides comprehensive reporting and analytics features, allowing organizations to gain valuable insights into candidate performance. While Mettl also offers reporting and analytics, these are not as advanced and customizable.
  • Criteria offers seamless integration with other HR systems and software, streamlining the assessment process and enhancing efficiency. Against this, Mettl does not offer a similar, seamless integration. 

Cost: Custom pricing.

6. Vervoe

Best for Interactive Assessments

Vervoe has transformed how we conduct interactive assessments. Its platform enables candidates to engage in realistic job simulations, offering practical and direct insight into their skills. 

The AI-driven grading system is particularly impressive, providing quick and unbiased evaluations. The customizability and intuitive design of Vervoe make it an engaging platform for candidates, which in turn enhances their experience and participation. 

This focus on practical skill assessment has been key in our decision-making process, ensuring we select candidates who not only have the right qualifications but can also perform effectively in real-world scenarios.

What Makes Vervoe a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • Vervoe outshines Mettl in market research, offering more focused insights, a feature where Mettl is not as strong.
  • Vervoe’s comprehensive integration with marketing and analytics tools outdoes Mettl’s limited integration.
  • The tool offers richer data visualization for survey results, unlike Mettl’s, which has more basic visualization capabilities.
  • It has a diverse range of question types specific to market research and recruitment, which is a huge advantage over Mettl’s generic question formats.
  • Vervoe’s advanced AI-driven insights and feedback mechanisms are more sophisticated than the simpler insights and feedback offered by Mettl.

Cost: Starts at $300 as a one-time payment for up to 300 candidates.

7. Harver

Best for High-Volume Recruitment

(Image Source: Harver)

Harver is a really good tool for managing high-volume recruitment. The AI-driven capabilities of the platform excel in efficiently sorting through large numbers of applicants, significantly reducing the manual workload. 

Besides, its predictive analytics are particularly effective in quickly identifying the most promising candidates, ensuring we don’t miss out on top talent. The seamless integration of Harver with our existing HR systems has further optimized our recruitment process. 

This tool has been invaluable in handling large-scale recruitment drives, allowing us to maintain a high standard in our hiring decisions without being overwhelmed by the volume of applicants.

What Makes Harver a Good Alternative to Mettl?

  • The platform offers smoother HR system integration than Mettl, which has less seamless integration capabilities.
  • Its use of advanced predictive analytics aids in better hiring decisions. Against this, Mettl does not support advanced predictive analytics.
  • Harver has robust AI-driven assessment tools that offer deeper insights. Against this, Mettl has less sophisticated AI analytics features.
  • A strong focus on diversity and inclusivity in recruitment sets Harver apart from Mettl, which is less concentrated on these aspects.
  • Harver’s scalability makes it better suited for large organizations, unlike Mettl, which may struggle with high-volume recruitment scenarios.

Cost: Starts at €150/hour for assessment consultancy

Watch: How to Choose the Best Assessment Software

Evaluation Criteria

The evaluation of products or tools chosen for this article follows an unbiased, systematic approach that ensures a fair, insightful, and well-rounded review. This method employs six key factors:

  1. User Reviews / Ratings: Direct experiences from users, including ratings and feedback from reputable sites, provide a ground-level perspective. This feedback is critical in understanding overall satisfaction and potential problems.
  2. Essential Features & Functionality: The value of a product is ascertained by its core features and overall functionality. Through an in-depth exploration of these aspects, the practical usefulness and effectiveness of the tools are carefully evaluated.
  3. Ease of Use: The user-friendliness of a product or service is assessed, focusing on the design, interface, and navigation. This ensures a positive experience for users of all levels of expertise.
  4. Customer Support: The quality of customer support is examined, taking into account its efficiency and how well it supports users in different phases – setting up, addressing concerns, and resolving operational issues.
  5. Value for Money: Value for money is evaluated by comparing the quality, performance, and features. The goal is to help the reader understand whether they would be getting their money’s worth. 
  6. Personal Experience / Experts’ Opinions: This part of the evaluation criteria draws insightful observations from the personal experience of the writer and the opinions of industry experts.

Ready to Pick the Best Mettl Alternative?

So, which one of these Mettl assessment alternatives do you think has the best features and the most competitive pricing?

In my view, ProProfs Quiz Maker sounds really good with its overall ease of use and AI Quiz generator. It can help you create all kinds of assessments in just a few seconds. You can also create personalized quizzes with its customizable templates and offer real-time feedback to the candidates, making it one of the best tools in the business. 

Sounds like the best option to me.

FREE. All Features. FOREVER!

Try our Forever FREE account with all premium features!

About the author

Michael Laithangbam is the senior writer & editor at ProProfs with 12 years of experience in enterprise software and eLearning. Michael's expertise encompasses online training, web-based learning, quizzes & assessments, LMS, and more. Michael’s work has been published in G2, Software Advice, Capterra, and eLearning Industry.