The Truth About The West Bank

The correct answer is Self-Defense. This suggests that Israel took over the West Bank as a defensive measure, possibly in response to a perceived threat or attack. This could be due to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the need for Israel to secure its borders and protect its citizens. It implies that Israel's actions were driven by a need to protect itself rather than any aggressive intentions or desire to expand its territory.

Jordan joined the war with Egypt and Syria in a mission to destroy Israel. This suggests that Jordan, along with Egypt and Syria, formed a coalition to wage war against Israel. The question implies that Jordan's objective in joining the war was to participate in the mission of destroying Israel, and Syria was the other country involved in this mission.

It is not legal to destroy countries. The destruction of a country would involve causing harm to its infrastructure, economy, and its people, which is against international law. The sovereignty and territorial integrity of a country are protected under international law, and any act of destruction would be considered a violation of these principles.

Jordan did not have any legal justification in occupying the West Bank. The occupation took place during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, where Jordan captured and occupied the West Bank. However, this occupation was not recognized internationally as legal, and Jordan did not have any legal basis for its presence in the West Bank.

The correct answer is Judea and Samaria. This is because historically, the region known as the West Bank was referred to as Judea and Samaria, particularly during biblical times. It was only after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 that the term "West Bank" came into common usage. The term "Palestine" is also historically relevant, but it is a broader term that encompasses not only the West Bank but also other territories in the region. Israel, on the other hand, refers specifically to the modern-day country established in 1948.

Until 1917, the Ottoman Empire occupied the whole region. This implies that the Ottoman Empire had control over the entire region until that year. The other options, Palestinians and Jewish people, do not have historical evidence to support their occupation of the entire region during that time period. Therefore, the correct answer is the Ottoman Empire.

The statement is false because Britain's Foreign Minister Lord Balfour did recognize the Jewish people's historical right to their homeland. In 1917, Lord Balfour issued the Balfour Declaration, which expressed support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. This declaration played a significant role in the eventual creation of the state of Israel.

After the Second World War, the United Nations did indeed reaffirm the League of Nations mandate. This was done to continue the work of the League of Nations in promoting peace and security, as well as to address the new challenges and conflicts that arose after the war. The United Nations was established as a successor to the League of Nations, with the aim of preventing future wars and promoting international cooperation. Therefore, the statement is true.

The correct answer is "Two states". After the end of the British mandate, the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 recommended the establishment of two states in the region. This resolution, also known as the Partition Plan for Palestine, proposed the division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem being placed under international administration. It aimed to address the ongoing conflict between Jewish and Arab communities and find a solution that would allow for the coexistence of both groups in the region.

The UN recommended the establishment of two states, one Jewish and the other Arab. This recommendation was made in the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine in 1947, which aimed to divide the land into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan was approved by the UN General Assembly, but was rejected by the Arab states.

The statement suggests that the Jews accepted the UN recommendation. This implies that the Jews agreed with and followed the recommendation made by the United Nations. Without further context, it is unclear what the recommendation was about or the specific reasons why the Jews accepted it. However, based on the given information, it can be inferred that the Jews agreed with the UN's suggestion.

The statement says that the Arabs also accepted the UN's decision. However, the correct answer is False. This means that the Arabs did not accept the UN's decision.

At the end of the war, a cease-fire line was established. This suggests that instead of a permanent resolution or agreement, the fighting between the parties involved was temporarily halted. A cease-fire line typically marks the boundary beyond which military forces are not supposed to advance or engage in combat. This indicates that while the conflict may have paused, the underlying issues and tensions between the parties remained unresolved.

Israel captured the West Bank from Jordan. After the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jordan occupied the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. However, during the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel launched a preemptive strike against Jordan, resulting in the capture of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and other territories. The Israeli occupation of the West Bank continues to be a contentious issue, with ongoing conflicts and negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians for the establishment of a Palestinian state.

The area designated for recognizing the Jewish people's historical right to the land was half of 1%. This means that only a very small portion, less than 1%, was allocated for this purpose.

The League of Nations granted Britain a mandate to promote the establishment of a Jewish nation. The League of Nations was an international organization formed after World War I to maintain peace and resolve conflicts. The mandate system was established by the League of Nations to administer territories that were formerly controlled by the defeated powers of World War I. In this case, Britain was given the mandate to oversee the territory known as Palestine and to work towards the establishment of a Jewish homeland.

The phrase "disputed territories" should be used to describe the territories in question. This term suggests that there is a disagreement or conflict over the ownership or control of these territories. It does not take a position on who should have control but acknowledges that there is a dispute or disagreement among different parties involved.

During World War I, the Ottoman Empire was defeated by the Allied forces, which consisted of countries such as Britain, France, and Russia. As a result, the decision to divide the Ottoman Empire into two countries, namely Turkey and Iraq, was made by the Allied forces. This division was part of the Treaty of Sèvres, signed in 1920, which aimed to redraw the borders and establish new nations in the aftermath of the war. The decision was a reflection of the victorious Allies exerting their influence and shaping the geopolitical landscape in the region.