Section 13.4—quiz: Responsible Beverage Service

1. Servers and bartenders can be sued if someone is injured because of irresponsible alcohol service.

T

F

Servers and bartenders can indeed be held legally responsible if someone is injured as a result of their irresponsible alcohol service. This is because they have a duty of care to ensure that they serve alcohol responsibly and do not over-serve individuals who may already be intoxicated. If they fail to fulfill this duty and someone is harmed as a result, they can be sued for negligence. This is why it is important for servers and bartenders to undergo proper training and follow responsible alcohol service practices to mitigate the risk of injuries and legal consequences.

Explanation

Servers and bartenders can indeed be held legally responsible if someone is injured as a result of their irresponsible alcohol service. This is because they have a duty of care to ensure that they serve alcohol responsibly and do not over-serve individuals who may already be intoxicated. If they fail to fulfill this duty and someone is harmed as a result, they can be sued for negligence. This is why it is important for servers and bartenders to undergo proper training and follow responsible alcohol service practices to mitigate the risk of injuries and legal consequences.

2. It is considered an invasion of privacy for servers to keep track of the number of drinks guests have had.

T

F

Keeping track of the number of drinks guests have had is not considered an invasion of privacy for servers. This is because servers may need to monitor the amount of alcohol consumed by guests in order to prevent overconsumption and ensure the safety of the guests. Additionally, monitoring drink consumption can help servers comply with legal requirements and regulations regarding alcohol service. Therefore, it is not considered an invasion of privacy for servers to keep track of the number of drinks guests have had.

Explanation

Keeping track of the number of drinks guests have had is not considered an invasion of privacy for servers. This is because servers may need to monitor the amount of alcohol consumed by guests in order to prevent overconsumption and ensure the safety of the guests. Additionally, monitoring drink consumption can help servers comply with legal requirements and regulations regarding alcohol service. Therefore, it is not considered an invasion of privacy for servers to keep track of the number of drinks guests have had.

3. If a server suspects that an ID is false, he or she should quiz the guest about the information on the ID.

T

F

When a server suspects that an ID is false, it is important for them to quiz the guest about the information on the ID. This is because questioning the guest can help determine if they are being truthful or if the ID is indeed fake. By asking specific questions about the information on the ID, the server can assess the guest's knowledge and consistency, which can help in identifying any discrepancies or signs of deception. This can be a crucial step in ensuring the safety and security of the establishment and its patrons.

Explanation

When a server suspects that an ID is false, it is important for them to quiz the guest about the information on the ID. This is because questioning the guest can help determine if they are being truthful or if the ID is indeed fake. By asking specific questions about the information on the ID, the server can assess the guest's knowledge and consistency, which can help in identifying any discrepancies or signs of deception. This can be a crucial step in ensuring the safety and security of the establishment and its patrons.

4. All of the following are signs of intoxication, except:

Unusual conduct.

Impaired judgement.

Slowed reaction time.

Increased coordination.

Increased coordination is not a sign of intoxication. Intoxication typically leads to impaired coordination and motor skills, making it difficult for individuals to perform tasks that require precise movements. Signs of intoxication often include unusual conduct, impaired judgement, and slowed reaction time, as these are common effects of alcohol or drug consumption. However, increased coordination would be an unexpected symptom in this context.

Explanation

Increased coordination is not a sign of intoxication. Intoxication typically leads to impaired coordination and motor skills, making it difficult for individuals to perform tasks that require precise movements. Signs of intoxication often include unusual conduct, impaired judgement, and slowed reaction time, as these are common effects of alcohol or drug consumption. However, increased coordination would be an unexpected symptom in this context.

5. A 12-ounce beer and a 5-ounce glass of wine contain approximately the same amount of alcohol.

T

F

A 12-ounce beer and a 5-ounce glass of wine contain approximately the same amount of alcohol because the alcohol content in both beverages is measured by volume. Although the alcohol percentage may vary between different types of beer and wine, the total amount of alcohol in a 12-ounce beer is generally similar to that in a 5-ounce glass of wine.

Explanation

A 12-ounce beer and a 5-ounce glass of wine contain approximately the same amount of alcohol because the alcohol content in both beverages is measured by volume. Although the alcohol percentage may vary between different types of beer and wine, the total amount of alcohol in a 12-ounce beer is generally similar to that in a 5-ounce glass of wine.

6. Sean was hospitalized after a car accident. He was hit by Tim, a drunken driver who had just left a lounge at the Dropping By Bar. In a lawsuit, which party would Dropping By Bar represent?

First party.

Second party.

Third party.

Cannot be determined outside of court.

The Dropping By Bar would represent the second party in this lawsuit. The second party refers to the defendant, in this case, the establishment that served alcohol to Tim, the drunken driver who caused the accident. The bar may be held partially responsible for the accident if it is found that they served alcohol to someone who was visibly intoxicated, contributing to the negligence of Tim.

Explanation

The Dropping By Bar would represent the second party in this lawsuit. The second party refers to the defendant, in this case, the establishment that served alcohol to Tim, the drunken driver who caused the accident. The bar may be held partially responsible for the accident if it is found that they served alcohol to someone who was visibly intoxicated, contributing to the negligence of Tim.

7. The person or establishment selling or serving the alcohol is considered the first party.

T

F

The statement is false. The person or establishment selling or serving the alcohol is considered the second party, not the first party. The first party refers to the person consuming the alcohol.

Explanation

The statement is false. The person or establishment selling or serving the alcohol is considered the second party, not the first party. The first party refers to the person consuming the alcohol.

8. Sean was hospitalized after a car accident. He was hit by Tim, a drunken driver who had just left a lounge at the Dropping By Bar. In a lawsuit, which party would Sean represent?

First party.

Second party.

Third party.

Cannot be determined outside of court.

Sean would represent the third party in the lawsuit. The first party would be Sean himself, the second party would be Tim (the drunken driver), and the third party refers to any other party involved in the accident who is not directly responsible for causing it. In this case, Sean is not responsible for the accident and is therefore considered a third party.

Explanation

Sean would represent the third party in the lawsuit. The first party would be Sean himself, the second party would be Tim (the drunken driver), and the third party refers to any other party involved in the accident who is not directly responsible for causing it. In this case, Sean is not responsible for the accident and is therefore considered a third party.

9. Sean was hospitalized after a car accident. He was hit by Tim, a drunken driver who had just left a lounge at the Dropping By Bar. In a lawsuit, which party would Tim represent?

First party.

Second party.

Third party.

Cannot be determined outside of court.

Tim would represent the first party in the lawsuit. The first party refers to the person who caused the accident, in this case, Tim, the drunken driver. Since Sean was the one who was hit and injured, he would be the second party. The third party typically refers to any other individuals or entities that may be involved in the lawsuit but are not directly responsible for the accident. In this scenario, it is clear that Tim is the first party as he caused the accident by driving under the influence.

Explanation

Tim would represent the first party in the lawsuit. The first party refers to the person who caused the accident, in this case, Tim, the drunken driver. Since Sean was the one who was hit and injured, he would be the second party. The third party typically refers to any other individuals or entities that may be involved in the lawsuit but are not directly responsible for the accident. In this scenario, it is clear that Tim is the first party as he caused the accident by driving under the influence.

10. ______________ vary from state to state. They provide guidelines about who is responsible when someone suffers because of an intoxicated person’s actions.

Dram shop acts.

Common laws.

Joint and several liability laws.

Legal drinking ages.

Dram shop acts are laws that vary from state to state and provide guidelines on who is responsible when someone is harmed due to the actions of an intoxicated person. These acts hold establishments such as bars, restaurants, or liquor stores liable for serving alcohol to individuals who are already intoxicated or underage. By imposing liability on these establishments, dram shop acts aim to deter them from overserving alcohol and ultimately reduce the number of alcohol-related accidents and injuries.

Explanation

Dram shop acts are laws that vary from state to state and provide guidelines on who is responsible when someone is harmed due to the actions of an intoxicated person. These acts hold establishments such as bars, restaurants, or liquor stores liable for serving alcohol to individuals who are already intoxicated or underage. By imposing liability on these establishments, dram shop acts aim to deter them from overserving alcohol and ultimately reduce the number of alcohol-related accidents and injuries.