Placement Test Test

The correct answer is "with". In this sentence, the speaker is indicating that they are living in the same place as Mr Smith and his family. The preposition "with" is used to show a close association or companionship, which fits the context of the sentence.

The correct answer is "taller than." This is because the sentence is comparing the height of John and Paul, and "taller than" is the correct comparative form to use in this context. It indicates that John's height exceeds Paul's height.

The phrase "I am trying" indicates that the speaker is currently in the process of attempting to finish their test. This suggests that they are actively engaged in the task and do not want to be interrupted or distracted.

The correct answer is "smokes" because it is the present simple form of the verb "smoke" which matches the tense of the question. The question asks about a habitual action, and "smokes" indicates that he regularly smokes twenty cigarettes a day.

The correct answer is "for" because the phrase "looking for" is used to indicate searching or seeking something or someone. In this case, the person is searching for Mr. Smith's office.

The correct answer is "except." This is because the sentence states that nobody at the party knew the host, implying that everyone else at the party was known to the speaker. "Except" is used to indicate exclusion or exclusion from a group, making it the appropriate choice in this context.

The correct answer is "tell me" because when asking someone for information about someone else, we use the verb "tell" followed by the pronoun "me" to indicate that we want the information to be shared with us. In this case, the person is asking for the other person's name, so they would say "tell me" to request that information.

The sentence states that everyone understood, indicating that there was no need for the teacher to explain again. The phrase "didn't need" accurately conveys this idea, suggesting that the teacher did not have a requirement or necessity to explain again.

The correct answer is "lending" because the sentence is expressing a past action, and "lending" is the correct past participle form of the verb "to lend". The phrase "I don't remember lending it to you" indicates that the speaker cannot recall the act of lending the money.

The phrase "some information" is the most appropriate response in this context because the person is asking if they can help, and the response indicates that the speaker would like to receive a certain amount of information. The other options, such as "the information" or "any information," are too specific or general, respectively, and do not convey the same level of openness to receiving any amount of information. The option "to inform" is not a suitable response as it does not directly answer the question being asked.

The correct answer is "lost." This is because the sentence is in the past tense and the verb "lost" is the past tense form of the verb "lose." Therefore, it is the correct choice to complete the sentence.

The word "much" is the correct answer because it is used to quantify uncountable nouns, such as time. In this context, it implies that there is not enough time available to run because the movie is about to start soon. The other options, "many," "any," and "some," are not suitable because they are used to quantify countable nouns, not time.

The given correct answer is "doesn't she". This is because the question is asking for a confirmation or agreement with the statement "She likes living in a warm climate". In English, when we want to seek agreement or confirmation, we use a tag question. In this case, since the statement is positive ("She likes living in a warm climate"), the tag question should be negative ("doesn't she").

The correct answer is "used to." This is because the phrase "used to" is used to talk about past habits or states that are no longer true. In this context, the speaker is indicating that they used to smoke in the past, but they do not smoke now.

The correct answer is "did you go". This is because the question is asking about a past action, specifically who the person went to before their first visit to the doctor. The phrase "did you go" is the correct way to form a question in the past tense in English. The other options, such as "are you going" and "went you", do not correctly convey the past tense or form a grammatically correct question.

The correct answer is "a little" because it implies that the person did some homework, but the amount was small or insignificant. It suggests that they did not do a lot of homework, but still made an effort to complete some of it.

The question is asking if the person would like a cup of tea. The correct answer is "would" because it is the appropriate modal verb to express a polite request or preference.

The word "meets" is the correct answer because it means to fulfill or satisfy. In the context of the sentence, the speaker is saying that the new apartment may be small, but it fulfills their needs perfectly.

The correct answer is "wrote" because the sentence is in the simple past tense, indicating an action that happened at a specific time in the past. "Has written" is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that started in the past and continues to the present, which does not fit the context of the sentence. "Was writing" is in the past continuous tense, indicating an ongoing action in the past, which also does not fit the context. "Had written" is in the past perfect tense, indicating an action that happened before another action in the past, which is not necessary in this sentence. Therefore, the correct answer is "wrote."

The correct answer is "hasn't been repaired" because the sentence is in the present perfect tense, indicating an action that started in the past and continues up until the present. The word "hasn't" is the contraction of "has not," which is used with the past participle "been" to form the present perfect tense. Therefore, it implies that the house has not been repaired for years, emphasizing the ongoing state of disrepair.

The correct answer is "you go" because it is the correct form of the imperative verb "go" to suggest someone to do something. In this case, the speaker is suggesting that the person they are speaking to goes to bed.

The correct answer is "delaying". In this sentence, the verb "delaying" is used to indicate that the bus strike will cause a delay in the start of class. The other options, "have delayed", "delay", and "to delay" do not fit grammatically or contextually in the sentence.

The correct answer is "any" because the speaker is saying that there is not any coffee available. This indicates that there is a lack of coffee.

The correct answer is "repairing" because the phrase "but it's not worth" indicates that the speaker does not consider the act of repairing the watch to be valuable or worthwhile. Therefore, the gerund form "repairing" is used to convey that the speaker does not think it is worth the effort or cost to repair the watch.

The correct answer is "if he was coming." This is the correct form of the conditional clause used to ask about someone's attendance at the meeting. The phrase "if he was coming" indicates a hypothetical situation in the past, suggesting that the speaker asked about the person's plans to attend the meeting in the past.

The phrase "Sorry, but I'm very low on cash right now" means that the person does not have much money at the moment. "Low" in this context indicates a small or insufficient amount of cash. It implies that the person is not able to lend money because they do not have enough to spare.

The correct answer is "with the aim". This phrase is used to express the intention or purpose behind writing to the manager. It suggests that the writer wanted to achieve a specific goal, which in this case is to get their money refunded. The other options, such as "in the hope" or "with a view", do not convey the same sense of purpose or intention.

The correct answer is "went" because the phrase "it's time we" is followed by the past tense verb "went." This indicates that the action of getting ready should have happened in the past.

The correct answer is "hadn't". This is because the phrase "it's only a little cut" suggests that the speaker believes the cut is not serious. The use of "hadn't" implies that if the cut were more serious, the speaker would have a reason to see a doctor.

The correct answer is "were" because it is used in the past tense to match the verb "had" in the if-clause. "Would have been" is the correct answer because it is the correct conditional structure to express a hypothetical situation in the past.