Processo Seletivo Business English 2014

The correct answer is "me to come" because it completes the sentence grammatically and idiomatically. The phrase "want me to come" is a common construction in English when asking if someone wants another person to accompany them.

In England, it is common for children to start attending school at the age of five. This means that they begin their formal education at this age.

The correct answer is "such a long." In this sentence, we are talking about the length of time since we last had a holiday. "Such" is used to emphasize the extent or degree of the time, indicating that it has been a considerable amount of time. The phrase "such a long" is the correct way to express this emphasis.

The correct answer is "yours" because it is used to indicate possession. In the given sentence, the speaker is questioning whether the key belongs to them or to someone else. "Yours" is the appropriate pronoun to refer to something that belongs to the person being spoken to.

The word "so" is the most appropriate answer in this context because it implies agreement or confirmation. The speaker is expressing their belief that they are going the right way.

The correct answer is "Everyone was." This is because "everyone" is a singular pronoun, so it should be paired with the singular verb "was." The other options, such as "all," "every," and "someone," do not match the singular form of the verb and are therefore incorrect.

The correct answer is "couldn't". This is because the sentence is in the past tense and "couldn't" is the past tense form of "can't". It indicates that the speaker was unable to do Susan's job.

The correct answer is "if I'm". This is because the phrase "Don't worry" suggests that the speaker is reassuring someone about a future event. The use of "if" indicates that the speaker is uncertain about whether the event will actually happen. Therefore, "if I'm" is the most appropriate choice as it implies that the speaker is unsure about their availability for the event.

The word "nearly" is the correct answer because it indicates that the speaker almost missed the bus but managed to catch it just in time. The word "nearly" suggests a close call or a narrow escape, emphasizing the speaker's timing and the fact that they were able to catch the bus despite being very close to missing it.

The correct answer is "the higher your bill will be." This is because the phrase "the higher your bill will be" correctly expresses the cause and effect relationship between electricity usage and the resulting bill. As electricity usage increases, the bill also increases in a proportional manner.

The correct answer is "did you have to." This is because the question is asking about the reason for leaving early, which suggests a past action. The phrase "did you have to" is the correct past tense form of "have to," indicating a necessity or obligation to leave early. The other options are either in the wrong tense or do not convey the same meaning.

The correct answer is "you come" because the sentence is expressing a preference or desire for the person to come. The phrase "I'd rather" indicates a preference for a specific action, which in this case is for the person to come.

The correct answer is "more useful than" because it is comparing the usefulness of the detailed map to the usefulness of the atlas. The phrase "more useful than" indicates that the detailed map is considered to have a higher level of usefulness compared to the atlas.

The correct answer is "on". In this sentence, "on" is used to indicate a specific day. Therefore, the meeting is scheduled for a specific day, which is Thursday afternoon.

The correct answer is "I’d stay" because the sentence is expressing a hypothetical situation in the past. The phrase "a little longer" suggests that the person is considering staying for a longer period of time. "I’d stay" is the contraction of "I would stay," which is used to talk about hypothetical or unreal situations in the present or future.

The correct answer is "didn't". This is because the sentence is in the past tense and the speaker is expressing a wish that they didn't have to work tomorrow. "Didn't" is the past tense form of "do not" and is used to negate the verb "have" in this context.

The correct answer is "up". In this context, "set up" means to establish or start something, in this case, his own company. So, the money that the father won was used to establish his own company.

The correct answer is "was the telephone." The question is asking about the invention of the telephone, which is a singular noun. Therefore, the correct form of the verb "to be" to use is "was."

This sentence is expressing the idea that the speaker is unable to keep up with the person they are addressing. The correct answer, "up with," is the most fitting phrase to use in this context to convey this meaning.

The phrase "we are being followed" suggests that someone is following or tailing the speaker and the person they are with. This implies that there is someone walking behind them who is intentionally following their movements.

The phrase "cheer you up" means to make someone feel happier or more positive. In the given context, the statement "Here's some good news. It will cheer you up." suggests that the good news being mentioned will have a positive effect on the person's mood, making them feel happier or more uplifted.

The correct answer is "the following day" because Justin said he would do it tomorrow, which implies that he will do it on the day after the current day.

The correct answer is "Shall" because it is used to make suggestions or offers, which is evident in the context of the conversation. The speaker is offering to carry the bag for the other person, showing a willingness to help.

This question is asking about the location of someone's birth. The correct answer is "were you born" because it is the correct grammatical form for asking about the past.

The correct answer is "there must have". This is because the sentence suggests that the people living on the busy street experience a lot of noise from the traffic. The phrase "there must have" implies that the noise is a result of the busy street, indicating a cause and effect relationship.

The correct answer is "whose". This is because "whose" is a possessive pronoun that is used to show ownership or relationship. In this sentence, it is indicating that Susan is the woman whose husband is in the hospital.

Most people don't find it difficult to remember recent events because our short-term memory is designed to retain information for a short period of time. Recent events are usually fresh in our minds, making them easier to recall compared to events that happened a long time ago. Additionally, our brains are more likely to pay attention to and encode recent events, making them more accessible in our memory.

The correct answer is "which". In this sentence, "which" is used as a relative pronoun to introduce a relative clause. The relative clause "which have unhappy endings" provides additional information about the noun "stories". It specifies that the speaker does not like stories that have unhappy endings.

The correct answer is "were" because the sentence is in the past tense and "were" is the correct past tense form of the verb "to be" when referring to multiple people.

The correct answer is "I lose." This is because the sentence is in the present tense and the verb "lose" should also be in the present tense to maintain grammatical consistency.

The statement suggests that people find it easier to remember their own lives than world events. However, this is not necessarily true. While individuals may have a personal connection and emotional attachment to their own lives, world events often have a significant impact on society and are widely discussed and documented. Therefore, people may find it easier to remember world events that have had a lasting impact on their lives or have been widely covered in the media.

The correct answer is "As". This conjunction is used to indicate a cause-and-effect relationship between two events. In this case, it suggests that the worsening of the weather is a result of the passing of time throughout the day.

The phrase "told them off" means to scold or reprimand someone for their behavior. In this context, the speaker was annoyed with the children's behavior and likely expressed their disapproval or reprimanded them for their actions.

Forgetting small things can be useful because it allows us to focus on more important or relevant information. Our brains have limited capacity, and remembering every small detail can be overwhelming and inefficient. By forgetting small things, we can prioritize and retain information that is more significant or beneficial. Additionally, forgetting small things can help us move on from past mistakes or negative experiences, promoting personal growth and well-being.

The correct answer is "enough money to go". This phrase correctly completes the sentence by indicating that the speaker does not currently have sufficient funds to go on vacation. The phrase "enough money for going" is incorrect because it does not accurately convey the idea of having sufficient funds specifically for the purpose of going on vacation.

Rita Howard is not best at remembering things which happened a long time ago.

The correct answer is "we were going." This is because the question is asking about the past, as indicated by the use of "were" instead of "are." The phrase "where were we going" is the correct grammatical construction for asking about a past action or plan.

The correct answer is "at" because when talking about attending an event, we use the preposition "at" to indicate the location or place where the event took place. In this case, the sentence is referring to attending a concert, so "at" is the appropriate preposition to use.

The correct answer is "made up" because it means composed or constituted. In this context, it implies that the club committee consists of the president, the secretary, and seven other members.

The sentence is in the past unreal conditional form, expressing a hypothetical situation in the past. The correct answer "would have caught" is the result clause of the conditional, indicating that if the bus had not been late, the speaker would have caught the plane. This form is used to talk about unreal or hypothetical situations in the past and is formed by using "would have" + past participle.

The given statement suggests that when Rita was young, she believed that everyone possessed an exceptional memory. This implies that Rita herself believed to have an excellent memory, indicating that the statement is true.

The correct answer is "not to be". In this sentence, the verb "promised" is followed by an infinitive verb phrase. When making a promise, it is grammatically correct to use the infinitive form of the verb. Therefore, the correct phrase is "promised not to be late."

The correct answer is "being repaired". This is because the sentence is in the present tense and indicates an ongoing action. "Being repaired" is the correct form of the verb to convey this idea. The other options are incorrect because they are either in the past tense ("been repaired") or do not follow proper grammar ("bepair" and "repaired").

The statement suggests that people did not notice her ability to memorize information when she was at school.

Rita is perceived by others as knowledgeable about things she hasn't personally experienced. This suggests that people have high expectations of her and believe that she possesses a wide range of knowledge and understanding.

The phrase "in spite" is the correct answer because it is used to express contrast or opposition. In this context, it suggests that despite the awful weather, the person still had to take the dog out. The other options, although, despite, and even though, also indicate contrast, but "in spite" is the most suitable choice in this case.

This statement suggests that everyone's brain has the same capacity to store memories as Rita's brain. In other words, there is no difference in the memory capacity among individuals, implying that everyone has the potential to remember the same amount of information as Rita.

The sentence is discussing a situation where the speaker is unsure about the appropriate action to take. The word "whether" indicates that the speaker is considering two options - knocking or just walking in. Therefore, the correct answer is "whether to knock" as it accurately reflects the uncertainty and the two possible choices.

The statement "Rita is working as a historian" is false. This means that Rita is not currently employed in the field of history as a historian.

This statement suggests that Rita's abilities have remained the same despite her age. This means that her age has not affected or diminished her abilities in any way. Therefore, the answer "True" indicates that the statement is correct and Rita's abilities have not changed with age.