Multi-factor Authentication: Levels Of Assurance! Trivia Quiz

The correct answer is that the MFA credentials within DOE need to be able to authenticate through the services defined in the Segment Architecture. This means that the MFA implementation must align with the architecture framework and utilize the services provided by the Segment Architecture for authentication purposes.

PIV is abbreviated for Personal Identity Verification. This term refers to the process of verifying an individual's identity through various means, such as biometric data, smart cards, and personal identification numbers. PIV is commonly used in government and corporate settings to ensure secure access to sensitive information and facilities.

The MFA implementation at DOE is managed through the ICAM/MFA Implementation Working Group. This group is responsible for overseeing the implementation of MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) within the organization. They likely develop and enforce policies and procedures related to MFA, coordinate with different departments or teams to ensure consistent implementation, and provide guidance and support to ensure the successful adoption of MFA across the DOE.

Combining credentials cannot lead to Level 4 assurance. Level 4 assurance requires strong authentication methods, such as multifactor authentication, which cannot be achieved by simply combining credentials. It involves multiple layers of verification to ensure a higher level of security and trust. Therefore, the correct answer is "No."

Level of Assurance 3 and Level of Assurance 4 differ in terms of the type of tokens used. Level 3 tokens can be software-based, meaning they can be implemented using software applications or programs. On the other hand, Level 4 tokens have to be hardware-based, which means they require physical devices or tokens for authentication. This distinction highlights the varying levels of security and assurance provided by each level, with Level 4 requiring a higher level of security due to the hardware-based authentication method.

The progress of HSPD-12 is measured by OMB through Quarterly FISMA reports. These reports provide a comprehensive overview of the implementation and effectiveness of HSPD-12, allowing OMB to assess the progress made on a quarterly basis. This ensures that any issues or challenges can be identified and addressed promptly, and that the goals and objectives of HSPD-12 are being met consistently. Annual or monthly reports may not provide the same level of detail and frequency of assessment as the quarterly reports, making them less suitable for measuring progress effectively.

The acceptable Levels of Assurance to reach the OMB goals, according to the latest DOE MFA Implementation Plan, are PIV where possible, Level 4 desired, and Level 3 where Level 4/PIV is not possible. This means that if it is feasible, PIV should be used as the preferred level of assurance. However, if PIV is not possible, Level 4 is desired. And if Level 4/PIV is not possible, Level 3 can be used as an alternative.

FIPS 201-2 is the correct answer because it is a publication that specifically describes the specifications of a Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card. FIPS 199, SP 800-63, and SP 800-57 are not publications that focus on the specifications of a PIV card.

In FY 2016, the goals for Strong Authentication as required by OMB are to achieve 85% compliance for standard users and 100% compliance for privileged users. This means that 85% of standard users should be using strong authentication methods, while all privileged users should be using strong authentication methods.

NIST SP 800-63 defines four levels of assurance, which are Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, and Level 4. These levels of assurance provide a framework for evaluating and determining the strength of an authentication process. Each level has specific requirements and criteria that must be met to achieve that level of assurance.

It is possible to combine credentials to achieve Level 3 assurance. Level 3 assurance typically requires multiple factors of authentication, such as something you know (password), something you have (smart card), and something you are (biometric). By combining these different types of credentials, it is possible to achieve the higher level of assurance required for Level 3.

PIV-I stands for Personal Identity Verification-Interoperable. It is a form of PIV that is designed for non-federal entities. PIV, on the other hand, is the standard form of Personal Identity Verification used by federal employees and contractors. One of the main differences between PIV and PIV-I is that PIV-I does not require a background check. This means that individuals can obtain a PIV-I credential without undergoing the same level of scrutiny as those obtaining a PIV credential.

The correct answer is Network through Machine Based Enforcement because MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) implementation at this level of the technology stack involves enforcing authentication and security measures at the network level, using machines to enforce these measures. This means that authentication and security protocols are implemented and enforced at the network level, ensuring that only authorized machines are allowed access to the system.

The correct answer is PIV, PIV-I, CIV. These are examples of Level 4 tokens. PIV stands for Personal Identity Verification, PIV-I stands for PIV Interoperable, and CIV stands for Commercial Identity Verification. These tokens are used for authentication and access control in various government and commercial applications.

According to DOE O 206.2, uncleared contractors are excluded from DOE scope based on "risk assessment." This policy outlines the criteria and procedures for assessing and managing risk within the Department of Energy. It is likely that this policy includes guidelines for determining the level of risk associated with contractors who have not been cleared, and as a result, they are excluded from the scope of work to mitigate potential risks.

The correct answer is PIV. PIV stands for Personal Identity Verification, which is a credential that is fully compliant with the Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 201. This means that it meets all the requirements and specifications outlined in the FIPS 201 standard for secure and reliable identification and authentication of federal employees and contractors. PIV-I and CIV are also mentioned as options, but the question asks for the credential that is fully compliant, and PIV is the only option that meets this requirement.