Question Paper- Sitce,Kolhapur (100ques -60min)

The fourth sentence after the rearrangement should be 3.

The given statements establish a relationship between chairs, tables, sofas, beds, and couches. From the statements, we can conclude that some sofas are beds (III). However, there is no direct connection between couches and sofas, so we cannot conclude that some couches are sofas (I). Similarly, there is no direct connection between beds and tables, so we cannot conclude that some beds are tables (II). Therefore, the correct conclusion is that some sofas are chairs (III) as it is supported by the given statements.

Statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question because it tells us that Mary has a total of 5 coins. Since we know that Mary has Rs. 4 in 50-paisa and one-rupee coins, and the total number of coins is 5, we can deduce that Mary must have 5 - 4 = 1 50-paisa coin.

Statement I alone does not provide any information about the total number of coins, so it is not sufficient to answer the question.

Conclusion II follows from the given statements because statement IV states that "No poppy is pansy." Since some sunflowers are lilies (as stated in statement II), and no poppy is pansy, it can be concluded that "No sunflower is pansy" (as stated in conclusion II).

The given sentence is grammatically correct. There is no error in any part of the sentence.

The correct answer is the death of a chicken. This suggests that there was a disturbance or uproar in the market due to the unexpected death of a chicken. It implies that this event caused a commotion among the people present in the market, possibly leading to chaos or confusion.

The given sentence is grammatically correct. There is no error in any part of the sentence.

D is to the immediate right of I. This can be determined by analyzing the given information. F is not at the extreme ends and is second from the east end, so F cannot be to the immediate right of I. D is two places to the left of H, who is at one of the extreme ends, so D cannot be to the immediate right of I. G is to the immediate right of E, so G cannot be to the immediate right of I. C is not at the extreme end, so C cannot be to the immediate right of I. Therefore, the only option left is D, making D the correct answer.

The correct answer is (C). The error in the sentence lies in the phrase "is to reduction." The correct phrase should be "is the reduction." The use of the article "the" before "reduction" is necessary to indicate a specific reduction in poverty.

The owner was asked to give a sack of grain to the worker because the worker would have saved money by receiving the sack of grain instead of purchasing it.

The difference between the simple interest for 4 years and the compound interest for 2 years can be used to find the compound interest for 2 years. The simple interest for 4 years is given as Rs. 18080, so the simple interest for 2 years would be half of that, which is Rs. 9040. The compound interest can be found by subtracting the simple interest from the total amount after 2 years. Therefore, the compound interest would be Rs. 56500 - Rs. 9040 = Rs. 47460. The compound interest is Rs. 9402 more than the simple interest.

Argument I states that reservation on communal basis will check most of the intercommunal biases. This argument suggests that by providing reservation based on communal lines, it will address and reduce biases between different communities. This implies that reservation can be an effective tool to promote social inclusion and equality. However, argument II states that a secular state like Qurs should not have reservation on communal basis. This argument highlights the importance of maintaining a secular and unbiased approach in governance. Since only argument I supports the idea of reservation on communal basis, the correct answer is "if only argument I is strong".

F is not at the extreme ends, but is second from the east end. D is two places to the left of H, who is at one of the extreme ends. Based on these clues, we can determine that F is second from the east end and D is two places to the left of H. Therefore, F is standing between D and H.

The owner turned pale because the magistrate asked him to give the worker a sack of grain.

The owner was asked to give a sack of grain to the worker because it would have allowed the worker to save money. By receiving a sack of grain, the worker would not have to spend money on purchasing it, thus saving him the cost of a sack of grain.

The statement mentions that there is a tremendous response for the new XYZ's car-booking, with long queues of people complaining about the duration of business hours and arrangements. Based on this, it can be inferred that people are willing to spend several hours waiting for the booking. Therefore, course of action I, which suggests that people should make arrangements for lunch and snacks while going for car XYZ's booking and be ready to spend several hours, logically follows. Additionally, course of action II, which suggests making arrangements for more booking desks and increased business hours to serve more people in less time, also logically follows as it addresses the issue of long queues and aims to serve more people efficiently.

The correct answer is the death of a chicken. The commotion in the market was caused by the death of a chicken, which could have led to a dispute or disturbance among the people present.

The argument I states that compulsory medical examination before marriage is an intrusion to privacy and cannot be tolerated. This argument highlights the importance of individual privacy and personal autonomy. On the other hand, argument II states that such examinations can substantially reduce the risk of giving birth to children with serious ailments. This argument emphasizes the potential benefits of pre-marital medical examinations in terms of ensuring the health and well-being of future children. Both arguments have valid points, and either argument can be considered strong depending on one's perspective.

TQ is the combination in which the first person (T) is sitting to the immediate left of the second person (Q). This can be determined by following the given information: Q is sitting to the left of T, and T is opposite P. Since P is sitting in between U and V, and V is opposite Q, it can be concluded that T is sitting to the immediate left of Q.

The correct answer is 3 because it should be the fourth sentence after the rearrangement.

The second sentence after the rearrangement should be 5.

The statement mentions that there has been an unprecedented increase in the number of requests for berths in long distance trains during the current holiday season. Course of action I suggests that the railway authority should immediately increase the capacity in each of these trains by attaching additional coaches. However, there is no information given in the statement about the availability of additional coaches or the feasibility of attaching them. Course of action II suggests that the people seeking accommodation should be advised to make their travel plans after the holiday. This follows logically as it addresses the issue of high demand by suggesting a solution that can help manage the situation better.

The correct answer is "persuaded." This is because the word "persuaded" means to convince someone to do something, which fits the context of the sentence. The speaker is trying to convince the person to stay another day.

The owner of the shop was initially overjoyed with the magistrate's judgement because the magistrate asked the worker to pay him a hundred rupees. This means that the worker would have to compensate the owner for any damages or losses caused, which would benefit the owner financially.

Statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question because it provides the information that the secretary spoke at an average of 50 words per minute. By multiplying the average words per minute by the total time, we can calculate the duration of the speech.

Statement II alone is also sufficient to answer the question because it states that the secretary would have spoken for 10 minutes extra if his speech rate had been 4 words per minute. This information allows us to calculate the duration of the speech.

Therefore, each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question.

The given statements state that all triangles are ovals, all ovals are circles, some circles are squares, and some squares are rectangles. From these statements, it can be concluded that some circles are triangles because triangles are ovals and ovals are circles. However, it cannot be concluded that some rectangles are ovals or that some squares are triangles, as there is no direct relationship stated between these shapes in the given statements. Therefore, the correct conclusion that logically follows is Only II follows, which states that some circles are triangles.

The course starts with Botany on 2nd July. 3rd July is a holiday, so there is no subject on that day. Geography should be on the previous day of Mathematics, which means it should be on 8th July. The course ends with Chemistry, so Physics should be after the holiday on 4th July. There should be a gap of one day between Economics and Mathematics, so Mathematics should be on 7th July. There should be a gap of two days between Zoology and Economics, so Zoology should be on 5th July. Therefore, there are three days gap between Geography and Physics.

Based on the given information, we can determine the positions of some of the people. F is second from the east end, so F cannot be in the 1st or 7th position. H is at one of the extreme ends, so H cannot be in the 2nd or 6th position. G is to the immediate right of E, so G and E must be next to each other. C is not at the extreme end, so C cannot be in the 1st or 7th position. I is sitting in the center, so I must be in the 4th position. Therefore, the only position left for C is the 3rd position from the west end. Thus, the statement "C is 3rd from the west end" is definitely true.

If Q and S interchange their positions, it means that Q will now be sitting to the immediate left of S. Since P is sitting in between U and V, and V is opposite Q, it means that P is also opposite S. Therefore, P is sitting to the immediate left of S.

The word "mistakenly" means to do something in error or by mistake. The opposite of this would be "deliberately," which means to do something intentionally or on purpose.

Komal purchased a computer for Rs.52000 and sold it at a loss of 25 percent. This means she sold it for 75 percent of the original price. The amount she received from selling the computer is 75/100 * Rs.52000 = Rs.39000.

Then, she purchased another computer and sold it at a gain of 35 percent. This means she sold it for 135 percent of the purchase price. The amount she received from selling the second computer is 135/100 * Rs.39000 = Rs.52650.

To find out the overall gain/loss, we need to subtract the initial cost from the final amount received. Rs.52650 - Rs.52000 = Rs.650.

Therefore, the overall gain/loss of Komal is Rs.650.

In the word "ECONOMICS," there are three pairs of letters that have as many letters between them as in the English alphabet. These pairs are "C-O," "O-N," and "I-C." Each of these pairs has one letter between them, which corresponds to the letter in the English alphabet (B, M, and H, respectively). Therefore, the answer is Three.

If the average of X and Y is Z, it means that Z is the middle number between X and Y. Therefore, Z is the highest number among the three consecutive integers. However, statement II does not provide any information about the relationship between X, Y, and Z, so it is not sufficient to answer the question. Therefore, statement I alone is sufficient to determine that Z is the highest number.

not-available-via-ai

The statement suggests that most students from premier engineering colleges in India migrate to developed nations for better prospects. Course of action I proposes that all students joining these colleges should be asked to sign a bond to remain in India for at least ten years after completing education. This would ensure that the students contribute to the development of the country. Course of action II suggests that students who desire to settle in developed nations should be asked to pay the entire cost of their education, which the government subsidizes. This would ensure that the burden of subsidizing education for students who do not plan to stay in India is shifted to them. Therefore, either I or II could logically follow.

Conclusion I follows from the given statements because it is possible for some topaz to be sapphires, as stated in statement III. However, conclusion II does not follow because there is no direct relationship stated between emeralds and diamonds. Conclusion III also does not follow because there is no direct relationship stated between sapphires and pearls.

Neither argument I nor argument II is strong. Argument I states that cutting trees should be banned to restore ecological balance, but it does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. Argument II states that a total ban on cutting trees would harm timber-based industries, but it does not consider any alternative solutions or weigh the potential benefits of banning tree cutting against the harm to industries. Therefore, neither argument is strong enough to support a definitive answer.

The given statements provide information about the squares and cubes of p and m, but they do not directly give any information about the values of p and m themselves. Therefore, the statements (I) and (II) together are not sufficient to answer the question.

Based on the given information, F is not at the extreme ends and is second from the east end. H is at one of the extreme ends and D is two places to the left of H. G is to the immediate right of E and C is not at the extreme end. I is sitting in the center. From this information, we can conclude that F and I are not neighbors, G and I are not neighbors, E and C are not neighbors, and H and G are not neighbors. Therefore, none of the given options are neighbors.

not-available-via-ai

The given information does not provide any specific day for Mathematics. We know that the course starts with Botany and ends with Chemistry, and that there should be a gap of one day between Economics and Mathematics. However, we do not have enough information to determine the exact day for Mathematics. Therefore, the answer is "Cannot be determined".

The statement discusses whether pollution can be controlled. Argument I suggests that if everyone realizes the hazards of pollution and cooperates to eliminate it, pollution can be controlled. Argument II, on the other hand, states that factors such as crowded highways, factories, an ever-growing population, and the desire for more land make pollution uncontrollable. The correct answer is "if only argument II is strong" because it provides valid reasons for why pollution may not be controlled. Argument I does not address the specific challenges mentioned in argument II.

Based on the given information, we can deduce the following:
- Hockey was not played on the closing day, so it cannot be the first game.
- Tennis was played on the previous day of Cricket, so Tennis cannot be the first game.
- Football was not played on Wednesday or Saturday, so it cannot be the first game.
- No game was played on Thursday or Sunday, so Cricket cannot be the first game.
- Volleyball was played on Monday, so it cannot be the first game.

Therefore, based on the given information, we cannot determine which game started the sports week. Hence, the answer is "None of these".

The given statements do not provide any direct or logical relationship between the objects mentioned. Therefore, none of the conclusions can be logically inferred from the given statements.