Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris Pas I

40 Questions | Total Attempts: 184

SettingsSettingsSettings
Please wait...
Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris Pas I


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 
       National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam?            People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education  system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system.         Whoever  there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester.      In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.The text is about ....
    • A. 

      The process of the national exam

    • B. 

      The story of the national exam

    • C. 

      The pros and cons about the national exam

    • D. 

      The description about the national exam

    • E. 

      The information about the national exam

  • 2. 
      Text              National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam?            People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education  system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system.         Whoever  there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester.      In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.The text is about ....
    • A. 

      To evaluate how the result of the teaching

    • B. 

      To evaluate the students’ skill in several subjects

    • C. 

      To detect the students’ competence in all subjects

    • D. 

      To evaluate the students’ capability in several subjects

    • E. 

      To detect the students’ ability in studying the school’s subject

  • 3. 
     Text              National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the government on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam? Will the quality of the Indonesian system worsen without national exam?            People, who support the national exam, explain that the quality of the Indonesia education  system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system.         Whoever  there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn’t need the national exam because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students’ competences throughout the semester.      In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students’ competence in several subjects , on a national scale.“Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students’ competence in specific subjects,...”.The antonym of the underlined word is .... 
    • A. 

      Ability

    • B. 

      Attitude

    • C. 

      Disability

    • D. 

      Capability

    • E. 

      Compilation

  • 4. 
     Text                People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents.              To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture.             Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people.           On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.The best title for the text is .... 
    • A. 

      The wood

    • B. 

      Wood furniture

    • C. 

      Trees for woods

    • D. 

      The wood industry

    • E. 

      Cutting down the trees

  • 5. 
     Text                People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents.              To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture.             Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people.           On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.The purpose of the writer in writing the text is .... 
    • A. 

      To describe the wood industry

    • B. 

      To share an amusing event to others

    • C. 

      To inform the readers about the news

    • D. 

      To persuade the readers to read the article

    • E. 

      To presents two points of view about an issue

  • 6. 
     Text                People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents.              To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture.             Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people.           On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.Which statement is in line with the writer’s opinion ? 
    • A. 

      The cutting down of the trees should continue

    • B. 

      The cutting down of the trees should be banned

    • C. 

      Wood is used by by million people to build houses

    • D. 

      Wood is natural material for housing and furniture

    • E. 

      The cutting down of trees leads to heat in dry season

  • 7. 
      Text                People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents.              To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture.             Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people.           On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them.the advantage of wood according to the wood industry, except....
    • A. 

      To build

    • B. 

      To make furniture

    • C. 

      To replace other material

    • D. 

      To provide jobs for many people

    • E. 

      To reduce unemployment in rural areas

  • 8. 
      Text                People in the wood industry believe that the practice of cutting down trees should continue. On the other hand, many people went to ban it altogether. Which side is right? First of all, let us look at arguments used to support the wood trade and then look at those of opponents.              To begin with, the wood industry claims that the wood is a natural material for housing and furniture at man areas. And wood is used by million of people to build houses and make beautiful furniture.             Opponents believe that they are not so many different kinds of materials that is no longer necessary or indeed just to cut down trees in the forests for wood. In addition, the cutting down trees leads to heat in dry season. These flood in turn cause erosion. These environmental changes have a negative impact on the live hood of people.           On balance, I believe that the cutting down of trees should be banned. Despite the fact that wood is necessary for building and furniture, man should learn to share the earth with creatures and other living things , not just explode them."on balance, I believe that the cutting down of the trees should banned". the underlined word means.... 
    • A. 

      Permitted

    • B. 

      Advised

    • C. 

      Allowed

    • D. 

      Prohibited

    • E. 

      Recommended

  • 9. 
    Text ADOPTION             Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or  her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not.           Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child.          But there are couples who cannot have  children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked.           State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names.         On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right.         On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her.          Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally.An adoptive child has no right .... 
    • A. 

      To receive inheritance

    • B. 

      To get adequate love and care

    • C. 

      To know his/her adoption records

    • D. 

      To live with his/her natural parents

    • E. 

      To be well treated as member of a family

  • 10. 
     Text ADOPTION             Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or  her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not.           Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child.          But there are couples who cannot have  children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked.           State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names.         On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right.         On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her.          Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally. Which of the following is the reason why parents place their child up for adoption ? 
    • A. 

      He or she is from a poor family

    • B. 

      His or her parents do not love them

    • C. 

      His or her parents are not in good health

    • D. 

      His or her parents does not want to raise him/her

    • E. 

      His or her parents can not afford to give a good education

  • 11. 
    Text ADOPTION             Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or  her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not.           Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child.          But there are couples who cannot have  children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked.           State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names.         On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right.         On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her.          Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally.The writer's purpose in writing the text is .... 
    • A. 

      To tell readers how to adopt a child

    • B. 

      To describe people who adopt the child

    • C. 

      To explain to readers how an adopted child raised

    • D. 

      To persuade people to have a foster or to adopt a child

    • E. 

      To inform readers the reason and problems of adopting a child

  • 12. 
     Text ADOPTION             Adoption is the process by which people take a child who was not born to them and raise him or  her as a member of their family. By law, adopted child has all the legal rights of the member of the family that raises him or her. A foster child does not.           Parents place their children up for adoption for many reasons. Some parents feel they cannot adequately care for their off springs because of health or economic condition. Some others, especially unwed parent, may not want to raise a child.          But there are couples who cannot have  children of their own. Adoption give them opportunity to raise a family. They can get one from an adoption agency if they have all the requirements asked.           State laws prohibit adoption agencies from revealing the identity of the natural parents to the adoptive parents. These laws also forbid agencies from disclosing the identity of the adoptive parents to the natural parents’ names.         On the contrary, many adopted people worked to change the laws. They argue that people have a right to know their identity. They said that keeping secret their adoptions records violate their right.         On the other hand, many people feel adoption records should be keep secret. If not, natural parent might change their minds years later and take the child away from the parents who raised him or her.          Some experts advise that a child should know of the adoptions by the age of 6 or 7. Surveys have shown that most adopt that children develop normally.   Which of the following is the most improbable reason why adopted children  want to have or know their adopted records ? 
    • A. 

      They want to know their natural parents

    • B. 

      They want to know why they are adopted

    • C. 

      They want to know their status in adoptive parents

    • D. 

      They want to pay back their adoptive parents expenditure

    • E. 

      They want to know why their parents place them up for adoption

  • 13. 
    A : “I can’t find my mobile phone in my bag.”B : “Well, you ..... it in the car. Let’s take a look.”
    • A. 

      Must leave

    • B. 

      Should leave

    • C. 

      Might have left

    • D. 

      Should have leave

    • E. 

      Had better leave

  • 14. 
    Rani : Why do you look so sad ?Dina : I got 5 for my English testRani : ....... 
    • A. 

      You may prepare it

    • B. 

      You have studied hard

    • C. 

      You must have studied hard

    • D. 

      You should have studied hard

    • E. 

      You might have studied hard

  • 15. 
    Paul : None of the passengers saved in the car accident yesterday.Andi : It ..... a very terrific accident. 
    • A. 

      Must be

    • B. 

      Should be

    • C. 

      Must have been

    • D. 

      Ought to have been

    • E. 

      Would have been

  • 16. 
    Cory     : Mom, it didn’t take a long time for preparing dinner today.Mother: It ..... longer to get dinner made without your help. 
    • A. 

      Should have taken

    • B. 

      Would have taken

    • C. 

      Have taken

    • D. 

      Would take

    • E. 

      Could take

  • 17. 
      Andri : She didn’t answer when I knocked on the door. She ...... sleeping. 
    • A. 

      Must

    • B. 

      May be

    • C. 

      Can be

    • D. 

      May have been

    • E. 

      Might have been

  • 18. 
    Nita : Will he pay all his debt ?Dita : Yes, if he .... the inheritance. 
    • A. 

      Got

    • B. 

      Gets

    • C. 

      Is gotten

    • D. 

      Had gotten

    • E. 

      Would get

  • 19. 
    A:”What would you do if you were a Millionaire ?”B: “... a trip around the world.
    • A. 

      I took

    • B. 

      I will take

    • C. 

      I would take

    • D. 

      I will have taken

    • E. 

      I would have taken

  • 20. 
     If we go to the top , we will have a nice view of Jakarta.This sentence means .... 
    • A. 

      We saw Jakarta last month

    • B. 

      We have already seen Jakarta from the top

    • C. 

      We are now looking and having a nice of Jakarta

    • D. 

      There is possibility of seeing Jakarta from the top

    • E. 

      There isn’t any possibility of seeing Jakarta from the top

  • 21. 
     X: How is your boss ? Did he sold his stock in the company ?Y: My boss would make a lot of money if he had sold his stock in the company earlier.X: What do you mean ?Y: .... 
    • A. 

      My boss made a lot of money because he sold his stock earlier

    • B. 

      My boss made a lot of money though he didn’t sell his stock earlier

    • C. 

      My boss didn’t make a lot of money though he sold his stock earlier

    • D. 

      My boss he sold his stock earlier so he would make a lot of money

    • E. 

      My boss doesn’t sell his stock earlier so he doesn’t make a lot of money

  • 22. 
        Reni : “If I had known it was very interesting, I ...  it.” 
    • A. 

      Would buy

    • B. 

      Won't buy

    • C. 

      Will have bought

    • D. 

      Would have bought

    • E. 

      Would never have bought

  • 23. 
    Aldi   : “Did you meet your brother yesterday ?”Reno: “No, I didn’t. If I had come earlier, I would have meet him.”This sentence means .... 
    • A. 

      I came late , so I would not meet him

    • B. 

      I came early so that I would meet him

    • C. 

      I came early, therefore I would not meet him.

    • D. 

      Although I came early, I would not meet him

    • E. 

      I did not come late; nevertheless I would not meet him

  • 24. 
    Anna : How is the novel that I borrowed to you ?Wina : It was such ... that I read it in one sitting. 
    • A. 

      Interested

    • B. 

      Interesting

    • C. 

      Interestingly

    • D. 

      An interested story

    • E. 

      An interesting story

  • 25. 
    Father : How was your first day of the English course ?Nisma : It was so ... that I have already got many friends easily. 
    • A. 

      Excite

    • B. 

      Excited

    • C. 

      Exciting

    • D. 

      An excited day

    • E. 

      An excitingday

Back to Top Back to top