Ottawa Rules/Spinal Immobilisation Quiz

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team

The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.

Learn about Our Editorial Process

| By Claire Hastings

Claire Hastings

Community Contributor

Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 134

Questions: 13 | Attempts: 134 | Updated: Mar 21, 2023

Questions

Settings

Create your own Quiz

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Whatsapp Share on Pinterest Share on Email Copy to Clipboard Embed on your website

Questions and Answers

1.

Indicate by clicking on the image where you would palpate to check for pain at the head of fibula in the patients right leg.
2.

Please click on the image to indicate where you would palpate to check for pain at the base of the 5th metatarsal.
3.

Kuldip a 48 year old male fell off his bike on the way to work this morning, he is normally fit and healthy and does not take any regular medication. You carry out a knee assessment and find the following there is some moderate swelling around the knee. There is pain (score of 5) directly on the patella as well as above and below and at either side of the patella. There is no isolated pain at the head of the fibula, he is able to bend his knee to 90 degrees and when he takes 4 steps at the scene he is able to compete it but complains of an increase in pain (pain score7). Kuldip needs to go to the Emergency department for an X-ray.
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
B. False

Explanation
Although Kuldip has pain directly on the patella, it is not isolated as there is also pain in the area of the knee surrounding the patella, therefore it is not significant and does not require an X-ray.

Rate this question:
4.

The Ottawa rules are always appropriate for use on children.
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
B. False

Explanation
The should be used with caution if under the age of 18. You must judge if the child is able to understand the questions and respond appropriately.

Rate this question:
5.

Brooke a 24 year old female was playing football and injured her ankle as a result of a bad tackle. She has no pain in the malleolar zone she also has no pain in the lateral or medial malleolus. She does have pain in the mid-foot region, this is focused at the base of the fifth metatarsal but not the navicular. She is able to weight bear with difficulty and has no other injuries of note or distracting factors. Brooke will need to have an X-ray.
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
A. True

Explanation
Even though Brooke is able to weight bear, she also has mid-foot pain and pain at the base of the 5th metatarsal therefore will require an X-ray.

Rate this question:

1
0
6.

Jay a second year a Paramedic Student is practicing carrying out the Ottawa Knee rule. They first check the patella for isolated pain, then check the fibula head for isolated pain. They then ask the patient to take 4 steps. Finally they ascertain that the patient is under 55 and does not have any distracting factors. Jay has carried out all steps of the test correctly.
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
B. False

Explanation
Jay forgot to check if the patient could bend the knee to 90 degrees.

Rate this question:

1
0
7.

Crystal is 60 and was at a family party when she stumbled in the high heels she had on and hurt her ankle, initially she was in quite a lot of pain but it has eased now. She limped up to meet the ambulance when you pulled up outside as she didn't want to make a scene at the party. There is some minor swelling in the malleolar region but not directly at the edge or proximal tips of the lateral and medial Malleolus. There is also no pain at the Navicular or base of the fifth malleolus. Crystal will require an X-ray
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
A. True

Explanation
Crystals age >55 means that she should still require an X-ray, we would also need to ask if Crystal had been drinking any alcohol at the party as this could be a distracting factor.

Rate this question:

1
0
8.

Jo, is 42 and was in the gym taking part in a high intensity interval training class when she jumped and landed badly. She noted a sudden pain in the area indicated in red. You assess the rest of the foot and ankle and find no other areas of pain or swelling. Jane is currently unable to walk for 4 steps and seems in severe pain. Does Jane require an X-ray
- A.
  
  Yes
- B.
  
  No
Correct Answer
A. Yes

Explanation
The Ottawa ankle rules only allows us to rule out X-rays for the ankle/mid-foot area. Not the toes or heel. Immediate severe pain and an inability to weight bear could indicate a fracture so it would be a good idea to get this injury X-rayed.

Rate this question:
9.

Which of the following indicates we can not use the Ottawa knee rules on a patient.
- A.
  
  > 50 years of Age
- B.
  
  The injury was sustained 8 days prior
- C.
  
  Patient is able to bend the knee 90 degrees
- D.
  
  The patient has diabetes.
Correct Answer
B. The injury was sustained 8 days prior

Explanation
We can't use the Ottawa ankle rule if an injury is greater that 7 days old.

Rate this question:

1
0
10.

Which of the following are reasons that the Ottawa ankle rules should not be used to clear a patient from an X-ray.
- A.
  
  The patient is intoxicated
- B.
  
  The patient also sustained a bump to the head during the incident.
- C.
  
  The patient has a nerve deficit to the limb caused by a previous stroke
- D.
  
  All of the above
Correct Answer
D. All of the above

Explanation
The Ottawa ankle rules should not be used to clear a patient from an X-ray if the patient is intoxicated because their judgment may be impaired, leading to a potential misinterpretation of symptoms. Additionally, if the patient sustained a bump to the head during the incident, there could be a possibility of a head injury that needs to be further evaluated. Lastly, if the patient has a nerve deficit to the limb caused by a previous stroke, it may mask or alter the typical symptoms associated with ankle injuries, making it difficult to accurately assess the need for an X-ray. Therefore, all of the above reasons justify not using the Ottawa ankle rules in these cases.

Rate this question:

1
0
11.

The remaining questions are intended to help you become familiar with the JRCAL Immobilisation algorithm Figure 4.10. Please read through the algorithm and then use the quiz to see how much you remember without looking at it. Which of the following is not true
- A.
  
  A patient under the age of 18 can not be cleared from spinal immobilisation using the algorithm
- B.
  
  A patient under the influence of alcohol can not be cleared from spinal immobilisation using the algorithm
- C.
  
  A patient with severe osteoarthritis can not be cleared from spinal immobilisation
- D.
  
  A confused patient can not be cleared from spinal immobilisation using the algorithm
Correct Answer
A. A patient under the age of 18 can not be cleared from spinal immobilisation using the algorithm

Explanation
A patient under the age of 16 can not be cleared using the algorithm.

Rate this question:
12.

The algorithm can not be used if there is a dangerous mechanism of injury such as fall from a height. According to the algorithm a fall from a heigh is classed as:
- A.
  
  >500 cm or 5 steps
- B.
  
  > 1 m or 5 steps
- C.
  
  > 1 m or 10 steps
- D.
  
  >5 meters or 10 steps.
Correct Answer
B. > 1 m or 5 steps

Explanation
The algorithm cannot be used if there is a dangerous mechanism of injury such as a fall from a height. According to the algorithm, a fall from a height is classified as > 1 m or 5 steps. This means that if someone falls from a height greater than 1 meter or approximately 5 steps, the algorithm cannot be applied and alternative measures should be taken.

Rate this question:
13.

Which of the following patients would not be low risk according the the algorithm?
- A.
  
  Was in a minor rear-end motor vehicle collision
- B.
  
  Has been ambulatory since the time of the injury.
- C.
  
  Has delayed onset of neck pain
- D.
  
  Was in a minor side-impact motor vehicle collision
Correct Answer
D. Was in a minor side-impact motor vehicle collision

Explanation
The algorithm categorizes patients as low risk based on certain criteria. In this case, the patient who was in a minor side-impact motor vehicle collision would not be considered low risk according to the algorithm. This suggests that the algorithm considers minor rear-end collisions and delayed onset of neck pain as factors that can still classify a patient as low risk.

Rate this question:
14.

You should check your patient for abnormal neurology according the the JRCAL algorithm these are : Loss of sensation, numbness, ________, burning pain.

Correct Answer
Pins and Needles, Pins & Needles, Pins + Needles, Tingling, Tingling

Explanation
The correct answer is "Tingling." According to the JRCAL algorithm, abnormal neurology symptoms that should be checked in a patient include loss of sensation, numbness, burning pain, and tingling. "Pins and Needles," "Pins & Needles," and "Pins + Needles" are all synonymous phrases that describe the sensation of tingling in the body. Therefore, tingling is the appropriate term to complete the given list of symptoms.

Rate this question:

4
15.

Even if a patient is uncooperative, confused or distressed it is still imperative that a patient with a suspected spinal injury should be immobilised.
- A.
  
  True
- B.
  
  False
Correct Answer
B. False

Explanation
Forcing a patient in this condition to be immobilised could cause more damage than it prevents. If there is a clearly severe spinal injury or the patient is unmanageable, consideration should be given as to wether additional support may be required to sedate the patient.

Rate this question:

2
0

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

Current Version
Mar 21, 2023

Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team
Jul 07, 2020

Quiz Created by
Claire Hastings

Ottawa Rules/Spinal Immobilisation Quiz

Indicate by clicking on the image where you would palpate to check for pain at the head of fibula in the patients right leg.

Please click on the image to indicate where you would palpate to check for pain at the base of the 5th metatarsal.

The Ottawa rules are always appropriate for use on children.

Which of the following indicates we can not use the Ottawa knee rules on a patient.

Which of the following are reasons that the Ottawa ankle rules should not be used to clear a patient from an X-ray.

The remaining questions are intended to help you become familiar with the JRCAL Immobilisation algorithm Figure 4.10. Please read through the algorithm and then use the quiz to see how much you remember without looking at it. Which of the following is not true

The algorithm can not be used if there is a dangerous mechanism of injury such as fall from a height. According to the algorithm a fall from a heigh is classed as:

Which of the following patients would not be low risk according the the algorithm?

You should check your patient for abnormal neurology according the the JRCAL algorithm these are : Loss of sensation, numbness, ________, burning pain.

Even if a patient is uncooperative, confused or distressed it is still imperative that a patient with a suspected spinal injury should be immobilised.