An Ultimate Microeconomics Knowledge Test!

The correct answer is MC = MR. In a monopolistic market, the profit-maximizing level of output is where marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR). At this point, the additional cost of producing one more unit is equal to the additional revenue generated from selling that unit. This ensures that the monopolist maximizes its profits by producing the optimal quantity of goods.

A monopolist charges a price above marginal cost, some potential customers value the product more than the margincal cost but less than the monopolists price end up not buying the good.

To maximize profit, Barbels Backerei should expand output. This is because the firm's marginal revenue (MR) is greater than its marginal cost (MC), indicating that each additional unit produced will contribute more to total revenue than it costs to produce. By expanding output, the firm can increase its total revenue and ultimately maximize its profit.

In a perfectly competitive market, there are many firms selling identical products, which means they have no control over the market price. The price is determined by the forces of supply and demand. However, firms have the ability to control their output by adjusting their production levels. They can choose how much to produce based on their own cost structures and profit maximization goals. So, the firm can control its output but not its price in a perfectly competitive market.

Average Revenue = the price of the good
Marginal revenue = price for COMPETITIVE FIRMS only

Nash equilibrium occurs when each player takes the best possible action given the strategies chosen by other players. In other words, it is a state in which no player can unilaterally change their strategy to improve their own outcome. At Nash equilibrium, all players are making optimal decisions based on the actions of others, and no player has an incentive to deviate from their chosen strategy. This concept is widely used in game theory to analyze strategic interactions between rational players.

Pulp & Paper mills produce dioxin, a harmful by-product. If the equilibrium price is too low, it means that the price of paper is lower than the social cost of producing it, leading to excessive production. Additionally, if the output is too high, it means that there is an overproduction of paper, which further contributes to the production of dioxin. Therefore, both the low price and high output are socially undesirable as they lead to environmental harm.

The statement suggests that buyers and sellers in a market do not consider the external effects, such as the impact on the environment or society, when making their decisions. This lack of consideration leads to an inefficient market equilibrium, where the quantity demanded and supplied do not reflect the true costs and benefits. Therefore, the statement is true as it highlights the inefficiency caused by the neglect of external effects in the market.

When a person's average tax rate is 25% and their marginal tax rate is 40%, it means that for every additional dollar of income they earn, they will have to pay 40 cents in taxes. Therefore, if they receive an additional $100 of income, the implied additional tax payment would be 40% of $100, which is $40.

A hockey ticket tax to help pay for the building of a new hockey arena is the best example of a tax justified under the benefits principle. This is because the tax is directly linked to the benefit received by the individuals who purchase hockey tickets. The tax revenue collected from the tickets is used to fund the construction of the new hockey arena, which in turn benefits the fans who attend the games. Therefore, the tax is justified as it aligns the cost of the arena with the individuals who directly benefit from it.

Sunk Cost cannot be recovered

Price discrimination by a monopolist tends to lead to output closer to that of a competitive firm. This is because price discrimination allows the monopolist to charge different prices to different customers based on their willingness to pay. By doing so, the monopolist can capture more consumer surplus and increase their overall profits. However, in order to attract more customers and compete with other firms, the monopolist may need to adjust their output levels to be more in line with what a competitive firm would produce. This can result in the monopolist producing a higher quantity of goods and services, similar to what would be seen in a competitive market.

Resale price maintenance refers to a practice where manufacturers set a minimum price at which their products can be resold by retailers. By implementing resale price maintenance, manufacturers can prevent free-riding, which occurs when some retailers benefit from the efforts of others to promote and sell the product without investing in marketing or customer service themselves. This helps ensure that all retailers contribute to the promotion and distribution of the public good, ultimately benefiting the manufacturer and the overall market. Therefore, most economists believe that resale price maintenance can be an effective solution to address the free-rider problem associated with public goods.

Both negative and positive externalities associated with the entry of new firms;

The major reason for the difference between cattle and whales is that whales are a common resource, meaning that they are not owned by any particular individual or group, whereas cattle are private property and are owned by farmers. This means that there are no regulations or restrictions on hunting whales, leading to overhunting and the near extinction of some whale species. In contrast, cattle are protected and managed by farmers, who have a vested interest in their preservation and therefore ensure their continued thriving on farms throughout the world.

Excludability refers to the property of a good where it is possible to prevent someone from using or accessing it. In other words, it means that the good can be restricted or limited to certain individuals or groups. This can be achieved through various means such as pricing, membership requirements, or physical barriers. Excludability is an important concept in economics as it determines whether a good can be effectively controlled and allocated to those who are willing to pay for it.

A free rider is a person who receives the benefit of a good or goods without paying for it. This term is often used in economics to describe individuals who take advantage of public goods or services without contributing financially. Free riders essentially "ride for free" on the efforts and contributions of others, benefiting from a resource or service without bearing the cost or responsibility.

Because of inefficiency due to externality, the market produces a quantity that is larger than the socially optimal quantity.

Even if snow tires cause $10 of damage, their benefits exceed their costs-- A $10 tire tax would however allow society the chance to decide if they want to use them and if they are worth it

A competitive firm maximizes profit when the price is equal to marginal cost. This is because marginal cost represents the additional cost incurred by producing one more unit of output, while price represents the revenue earned from selling that additional unit. When the price is higher than the marginal cost, the firm can increase its profit by producing and selling more units. Conversely, when the price is lower than the marginal cost, the firm would incur losses by producing and selling additional units. Therefore, setting the price equal to marginal cost ensures that the firm is maximizing its profit.

A progressive income tax is the best example of a tax that is usually justified on the grounds of the "ability to pay." This is because a progressive income tax system imposes higher tax rates on individuals with higher incomes, which is considered fair as those who earn more have a greater ability to contribute to the tax system. By implementing a progressive income tax, governments aim to redistribute wealth and ensure that individuals with higher incomes bear a larger tax burden, while those with lower incomes are taxed at lower rates to reduce the impact on their ability to meet basic needs.

Excess capacity predicts that in the long run equilibrium of a monopolistically competitive market, all firms will produce at a lower output level than the one at which average total costs are minimized. This means that firms in this market structure will not operate at their most efficient level of production, leading to excess capacity. This is because monopolistically competitive firms have differentiated products and face downward-sloping demand curves, causing them to have less market power and operate at a lower level of output compared to perfect competition.

Club goods are excludable-- a price must be paid to receive them.
Club goods refer to cable televison

Private goods are goods that are both excludable and rival. This means that access to these goods can be restricted to those who have paid for them, and consumption by one individual reduces the amount available for others. In the case of an ice-cream cone, it can be sold to a specific person and once they consume it, it cannot be consumed by another person. Therefore, an ice-cream cone is a private good.

Club goods are goods that are excludable but not rival, meaning that only certain individuals who pay for membership or access are able to benefit from the good, while their consumption does not diminish the availability or enjoyment of the good for others. The fire department can be considered a club good because it is funded by taxes or fees paid by residents or property owners in a specific area, granting them exclusive access to its services. However, the use of the fire department's services does not prevent others in the same area from also benefiting from its protection.

When the demand for the output of a competitive firm increases, it leads to an increase in price. Each of the 1000 current firms are willing to increase their quantity supplied by 2 units in response to the higher price. With free entry and exit, new firms will enter the industry to take advantage of the higher profits. This will further increase the total quantity supplied in the industry. Therefore, the total quantity supplied will be more than 2000 units.

In order to maximize profit, a seller should produce at a level where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. This is because when marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost, producing more units will increase profit. However, when marginal revenue is less than marginal cost, producing more units will decrease profit. Therefore, in this scenario, the seller should reduce output until marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profit.

Discount coupons are a form of price discrimination that enables firms to capture part or all of consumer surplus.

The main reason that cartels such as OPEC tend to fail is because self-interest drives individual players to renege on their cooperative agreements. This means that each member of the cartel is motivated to maximize their own profits, which often leads them to cheat on the agreements and produce more than what was agreed upon. This undermines the effectiveness of the cartel and reduces its ability to control prices and output levels.

The concentration ratio measures the proportion of the total output in the market that is supplied by the four largest firms. It is a measure of market concentration and indicates the dominance of a few large firms in the industry.

The marginal revenue for the 21st unit sold is $9. Marginal revenue is the change in total revenue that results from selling one additional unit of output. In this case, the monopolist is able to sell 20 units for $30 each, generating a total revenue of $600. When the 21st unit is sold for $29, the total revenue increases to $629. The marginal revenue for the 21st unit is therefore $629 - $600 = $9.

irrelevant-- nonrivalness and non-exclusion make national defence a public good, which would be true even if aerospace firm ran the military as a private company.

In a monopoly, a single firm has control over the market, allowing it to set prices. Since there are no close substitutes, the firm can charge a higher price, resulting in price exceeding marginal revenue. This is because the firm's marginal revenue decreases as it increases the quantity sold, due to the downward sloping demand curve. Therefore, the statement "For monopoly, price exceeds marginal revenue" is true.

The benefit derived from the installation of a traffic light can be calculated by multiplying the reduction in the risk of a fatal accident (0.5 percentage point) by the mid-level estimate of a statistical life (VSL) in Canada ($5.8 million). Therefore, the benefit would be 0.005 (0.5 percentage point) multiplied by $5.8 million, which equals $29,000.

Excess of receipts over government spending is a budget surplus

Marginal tax rate is addditional dollars as a percentage of additional income

The price effect decreases profit

Entry into a monopolistically competitive market will result in an increase in the number of firms competing in the market. This increase in competition will lead to a decrease in the market power of each individual firm, causing the demand curve for each firm to shift to the left. This shift indicates a decrease in the quantity demanded at each price level, as consumers have more options to choose from. Therefore, the correct answer is that the demand curve by each firm will shift to the left.

a monopoly has no supply curve.

It Improves efficiency by eliminating a distortion of behaviour caused by not pricing a scarce resource

no firm, not even a monopoly can charge what it wants

The example of the tragedy of the commons refers to a situation where a shared resource, such as a common grazing area or a fishery, is overused or depleted due to individuals acting in their own self-interest. In the case of environmental degradation, it can be seen as an example of the tragedy of the commons because when individuals exploit natural resources without considering the long-term consequences, it can lead to the degradation of the environment, affecting everyone who depends on it. This concept highlights the need for collective action and regulation to prevent the tragedy of the commons from occurring.

The benefits principle of taxation is associated with both vertical equity and horizontal equity. Vertical equity refers to the idea that individuals with higher incomes should pay a higher proportion of their income in taxes, while horizontal equity suggests that individuals in similar financial situations should pay similar amounts of taxes. The benefits principle of taxation aligns with both of these concepts by suggesting that individuals who benefit more from government services and programs should contribute more in taxes, ensuring a fair distribution of the tax burden.

Market Based Policies such as a corrective tax internalize an externality more efficiently.

In an oligopoly market structure, there are only a few large firms that dominate the market. Due to the limited competition, these firms have the ability to control prices and output levels. Oligopolists tend to underproduce because they can limit the supply in order to drive up prices and maximize their profits. By restricting output, they create artificial scarcity and can charge higher prices. This behavior leads to underproduction and overpricing compared to a perfectly competitive market where firms have no control over prices and output levels.

The question of how to reduce pollution to the appropriate level is important because it acknowledges the need for a balance. It recognizes that completely eliminating pollution may not be feasible or realistic, but instead focuses on finding the appropriate level of pollution that can be sustained without causing significant harm to the environment and human health. This question also implies the need for effective policies and strategies to achieve this goal, highlighting the importance of considering various factors such as technological advancements, economic implications, and social behaviors.

A natural monopolist refers to a situation where a single firm can produce a good or service at a lower cost than any potential competitor, giving them a significant advantage in the market. In such a scenario, if the natural monopolist were to produce at the competitive output and price levels, other firms would be able to enter the market and compete, driving down prices and reducing the monopolist's profits. Therefore, it is true that a natural monopolist cannot earn a profit while producing at the competitive output and price levels.

The best tradeoff in economics is the tradeoff between efficiency and equity. Efficiency refers to the ability to allocate resources in the most productive and optimal manner, maximizing output and minimizing waste. On the other hand, equity refers to fairness and ensuring that resources are distributed in a just and equal manner. The tradeoff between efficiency and equity arises because actions that promote efficiency, such as market competition and profit maximization, may lead to income inequality and disparities. Therefore, finding the right balance between these two objectives is crucial for a well-functioning economy.

A monopolist might produce at a loss as a long as variable costs are covered, if demand will not support a higher price

A lump sum tax is considered the most efficient type of tax because it imposes a fixed amount on individuals or entities regardless of their income or consumption. This type of tax does not distort economic behavior or create disincentives for work, saving, or investment. It is also simple to administer and does not require extensive resources for compliance and enforcement. Additionally, a lump sum tax is considered fair as it treats all taxpayers equally, regardless of their financial situation.

Cost Benefit Analysis is a process used to measure the estimated net social rate or return from an investment. It involves analyzing the costs and benefits of a project or decision to determine its overall value. By comparing the costs of implementing a project with the benefits it will generate, Cost Benefit Analysis helps in making informed decisions and assessing the economic viability of an investment. It helps in evaluating whether the benefits outweigh the costs and if the investment is worth pursuing.

The correct answer is that there is more traffic on highways. This explanation makes sense because highways are major transportation routes that accommodate a large volume of vehicles, including cars, trucks, and buses. With more traffic comes a higher likelihood of litter being generated, either intentionally or unintentionally, by people using the highways. Additionally, highways often have rest stops and gas stations where people may dispose of trash, further contributing to the litter along these roadways.

The given tax structure is regressive because as the income increases, the tax amount decreases. In this case, the person pays a higher tax amount of $2000 on an income of $10,000, which is 20% of their income. However, on a higher income of $20,000, they only pay $3000, which is 15% of their income. This means that the tax rate decreases as the income increases, indicating a regressive tax structure.

A price-discriminating monopolist would likely produce higher output with average revenue higher than the best single price because price discrimination allows the monopolist to charge different prices to different customers based on their willingness to pay. By producing more output and charging higher prices to customers with higher willingness to pay, the monopolist can maximize its total revenue and profits. This strategy is possible because price discrimination allows the monopolist to capture more consumer surplus and extract additional profit from different market segments.

A common good shares the feature of rival in consumption with a private good. This means that when one person consumes the good, it reduces the amount available for others to consume. In contrast, a nonrival good can be consumed by multiple individuals without diminishing its availability. Excludability refers to the ability to exclude individuals from consuming the good, while efficient provision by the market refers to the market's ability to allocate resources effectively.

Payroll taxes are the main source of income for the federal government. These taxes are levied on the wages and salaries of employees and are used to fund various government programs and services. Payroll taxes include Social Security taxes, which fund retirement and disability benefits, and Medicare taxes, which fund healthcare services for the elderly and disabled. By collecting payroll taxes, the federal government is able to generate revenue to support its operations and fulfill its responsibilities to the public.

The reason why the cow, a valuable source of food, does not face the threat of extinction is because cows are privately owned. This means that individuals or businesses have a vested interest in maintaining the cow population for their own economic benefit. As privately owned animals, cows are bred, raised, and protected by their owners, ensuring their survival and continued availability as a food source. Unlike other species that may rely on common resources or face limited protection, the private ownership of cows incentivizes their preservation and helps prevent their extinction.

Deadweight loss occurs because taxes distort behavior. When taxes are imposed, they alter the incentives and choices of individuals and businesses. This leads to a misallocation of resources and a decrease in overall economic efficiency. Taxes can discourage work, investment, and consumption, resulting in a loss of economic welfare. As individuals and businesses adjust their behavior to minimize the tax burden, it can lead to inefficiencies in the market and a reduction in economic output. Therefore, the distortionary effect of taxes is the primary explanation for deadweight loss.

The entire burden of the incidence of the corporate income tax falls on the people. This is because the tax is ultimately passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services, or to workers in the form of lower wages. Additionally, owners may also bear some of the burden through reduced profits. Ultimately, it is the people who bear the brunt of the corporate income tax through its indirect effects on prices, wages, and profits.

A firm should shut down in the long run if it is not covering its economic costs. Economic costs include both explicit costs (accounting costs and money outlays) and implicit costs (opportunity costs of using resources in the firm's current operations). If a firm is unable to generate enough revenue to cover these costs, it will not be able to sustain its operations in the long run and should consider shutting down.

Direct regulation allows polluters to pollute at no charge up to the limits set by the government. This means that polluters are not required to pay for the pollution they emit as long as it is within the limits set by the government. This is in contrast to market-based pollution control policies, such as emissions trading or pollution taxes, where polluters are required to pay for the pollution they emit regardless of the limits set by the government.

The presence of a large number of firms in an industry would make it difficult for oligopolists to collude and set prices. In an oligopoly, there are only a few dominant firms that control the market. If there are a large number of firms, it becomes harder for them to coordinate and reach agreements on pricing. With more firms, there is also increased competition, which can lead to price wars and prevent collusion. Therefore, a large number of firms acts as a deterrent to collusive behavior in an oligopoly.

To maximize profit, a monopolist should decrease output and raise price. This strategy allows the monopolist to reduce the quantity supplied, which creates scarcity and increases the price that consumers are willing to pay. By decreasing output, the monopolist can sell goods at a higher price, resulting in higher profits. This strategy is possible because the monopolist has control over the market and can manipulate the quantity supplied to maximize their own gains.

It is the additional revenue from selling more than one unit of output

Long run is only horizontal in a constant cost industry, otherwise a competitive market will have an upward sloping long run supply curve

Rival in consumption refers to a good or resource that can only be used by one person at a time, and when one person uses it, it reduces the availability or utility of that good for others. This means that the use of the good by one person directly affects the ability of others to use or benefit from it. It creates competition or rivalry among individuals for the limited quantity or access to the good.

The cigarette companies did not fight the legislation because the ban helped them cooperate and end advertising that they could not agree to stop on their own. This suggests that the ban provided a convenient solution for the companies to collectively address the issue of advertising, which they were unable to resolve individually. By removing the responsibility from the companies and imposing a ban, it allowed them to concentrate their advertising dollars in more effective media.

The coarse theorm states the market may be able to internalize externalities when negotiating costs are not excessive.

forming a cartel results in monopoly output

a tax system is efficient if raises the same amount of revenue at a lower cost to tax payers

Price discrimination by a monopolist tends to lead to output closer to that of a competitive firm. This is because price discrimination allows the monopolist to charge different prices to different groups of consumers based on their willingness to pay. By doing so, the monopolist can capture more consumer surplus and increase its overall profits. This strategy incentivizes the monopolist to produce a higher quantity of output, which brings it closer to the level of output that would be produced in a competitive market where multiple firms are competing.

When oligopolists engage in collusion and form a cartel, they effectively act as a monopoly. This means that they can collectively set prices and output levels, just like a single monopolistic firm would. As a result, the market outcome is the same as if it were a monopoly, with higher prices and reduced output compared to a competitive market. The collusion allows the oligopolists to eliminate competition and maximize their profits, leading to a less efficient market outcome.

Social services is the largest single source of revenue for Canada's provincial government because it encompasses a wide range of programs and services aimed at supporting the well-being and quality of life of its citizens. This includes income assistance, child and family services, housing programs, and support for individuals with disabilities or mental health issues. The funding for social services comes from various sources, including federal transfers, provincial taxes, and other revenue streams, making it a significant contributor to the provincial government's overall budget.

Instituting tolls is the simplest way to solve the problem of congested roads. By charging a fee for using certain roads, it discourages unnecessary or excessive traffic, thereby reducing congestion. This approach can also generate revenue that can be used for road maintenance and improvement projects. Additionally, tolls can incentivize people to carpool or use alternative modes of transportation, further alleviating traffic congestion.

The concept described in the given explanation is the "Price Effect." This effect states that when production is increased, the total amount sold increases, leading to a decrease in the per unit price. As a result, the profit on all other units sold is lowered. This concept highlights the inverse relationship between production levels and per unit price, which impacts overall profitability.

as oligopoly grows in size, the magnitude of the price effect falls

the excess capacity of monopolistic competition must be weighed against the resulting additional variety available to the consumer.

Predatory pricing refers to the practice of setting prices below the cost of production in order to eliminate competition and gain a dominant market position. By pricing below cost, a company can attract customers away from its competitors who are unable to match the low prices. This strategy is often used by larger companies with significant resources to sustain losses in the short term, with the intention of raising prices once competitors have been driven out of business.

An unregulated monopoly is inefficient because it equates marginal cost with marginal revenue rather than with demand. This means that the monopoly is producing at a quantity where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue, rather than producing at a quantity where marginal cost is equal to demand. By producing at a quantity where marginal cost is equal to demand, the monopoly could potentially maximize its profits. However, by equating marginal cost with marginal revenue, the monopoly may be producing either too much or too little, leading to inefficiency in the market.

Common resources are goods that are rival but not excludable. In the context of a fisherman fishing, common resources refer to natural resources such as fish in a lake or ocean. These resources are rival because if one fisherman catches a fish, it reduces the availability of that fish for other fishermen. However, they are not excludable because it is difficult to prevent other fishermen from accessing and catching fish from the same area. Therefore, common resources can be depleted or overused if not managed properly.

It is only progressive if the rich person pays a higher tax rate (more $$)

Cooperation is good for operating firms but not society as a whole

In a monopoly regulated by average cost pricing, the price charged by the monopolist equals the average cost of production. This means that the monopolist is able to cover all their costs, including both variable and fixed costs, through the price they charge. As a result, there is no economic profit because the monopolist is not earning any excess revenue beyond what is needed to cover their costs.

Monopolists produce at MR = MC below the competitive market where P = MC

A dominant strategy is a strategy that is the best choice for a player regardless of the strategies chosen by other players. This means that no matter what the other players do, this strategy will always yield the highest payoff for the player. It is a strong and dominant choice that maximizes the player's benefits without considering the actions of others.

Public goods are goods or services that are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, meaning that once they are produced, they can be consumed by additional people without incurring any additional cost. This is what makes public goods unique, as they can be enjoyed by everyone in society without depleting their availability. However, it is important to note that public goods tend to be overconsumed from the standpoint of society, as individuals may try to free-ride and benefit from the good without contributing to its production or maintenance.

Monopolistic competition differs from monopoly in terms of long-run profit. While monopolists can earn short-run profit, monopolistic competition allows for the possibility of long-run profit. In monopolistic competition, firms have some degree of market power and can differentiate their products, which enables them to earn profits in the long run. This is in contrast to monopoly, where a single firm has complete control over the market, allowing for sustained long-run profit.

When not all firms have the same cost of production, it means that some firms have lower costs than others. This creates an incentive for more firms to enter the industry in the long run, as they can potentially earn higher profits by producing at lower costs. As a result, the long-run market supply curve is likely to slope upward to accommodate the increased supply from these additional firms.

Replacing income tax with a flat rate consumption tax would decrease after-tax interest rates received on bank accounts. This is because under a consumption tax system, individuals would be taxed on what they spend rather than what they earn. As a result, people would have less disposable income to save and invest, leading to a decrease in the demand for loans and ultimately lowering interest rates on bank accounts.

Product differentiation in a monopolistically competitive market refers to the practice of producing and selling different products. This means that firms in this market differentiate their products through various features, such as design, quality, branding, or packaging, to make them unique and distinct from their competitors. By doing so, firms aim to create a perceived difference in their products, which can lead to increased customer loyalty, market share, and the ability to charge higher prices.

Vertical equity is a principle of taxation that suggests individuals with higher incomes should pay a higher amount of taxes. This ensures a fair distribution of the tax burden, as those with higher incomes have a greater ability to pay. Therefore, the statement "those with higher incomes pay more taxes" aligns with the concept of vertical equity.

In monopolistic competition, firms have rivals that set their price according to the demand they face. This means that each firm in the market has some degree of market power and can independently determine its price based on factors such as consumer preferences, competition, and market conditions. Unlike perfect competition where firms are price takers, firms in monopolistic competition can adjust their prices to maximize their profits based on the demand they anticipate from consumers. Therefore, the correct answer is that firms in monopolistic competition set their price according to the demand they face.