Mds April 24, 2015 Mtg With MOC
Settings
.
- 1.Rate Randall Roenigk, MD on content and presentation skills.
- A.
Excellent
- B.
Good
- C.
Fair
- D.
Poor
- 2.Did you find Patient Viewing Valuable?
- A.
Yes
- B.
No
- 3.Did you find the quality of cases valuable?
- A.
Yes
- B.
No
- 4.Did you find the patient protocols helpful?
- A.
Yes
- B.
No
- 5.Which case(s) did you find the most educational?
- A.
Case 1: Extensive SCC in the Setting of Epidermolysis Bullosa
- B.
Case 2: Perianal SCC vs. Bowenoid Papulosis
- C.
Case 3: Intravascular BCC during Mohs Micrographic Surgery
- D.
Case 4: Voriconazole-induced SCCs
- E.
Case 5: Isolated Congenital Proliferative Melanocytic Nodule
- F.
Case 6: Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
- G.
Case 7:Recurrent Aphthae in the Setting of Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- H.
Case 8: Self-healing Juvenile Cutaneous Mucinosis
- I.
Case 9: Kaposi Sarcoma
- J.
Case 10: Acquired von Willebrand Disease-associated Annular Purpura
- K.
Case 11: Inverse Atrophic Lichen Planus
- L.
Case 12: Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Surfactants in a Hypoallergenic Liquid Cleanser
- 6.Which case(s) did you find the Least educational?
- A.
Case 1: Extensive SCC in the Setting of Epidermolysis Bullosa
- B.
Case 2: Perianal SCC vs. Bowenoid Papulosis
- C.
Case 3: Intravascular BCC during Mohs Micrographic Surgery
- D.
Case 4: Voriconazole-induced SCCs
- E.
Case 5: Isolated Congenital Proliferative Melanocytic Nodule
- F.
Case 6: Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
- G.
Case 7:Recurrent Aphthae in the Setting of Myelodysplastic Syndrome
- H.
Case 8: Self-healing Juvenile Cutaneous Mucinosis
- I.
Case 9: Kaposi Sarcoma
- J.
Case 10: Acquired von Willebrand Disease-associated Annular Purpura
- K.
Case 11: Inverse Atrophic Lichen Planus
- L.
Case 12: Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Surfactants in a Hypoallergenic Liquid Cleanser
- 7.Did this program achieve its primary objectives to change competence, performance and\or patient outcomes? Check the objectives that were met.
- A.
1. Discuss new developments in diagnosis and treatment of various dermatologic conditions.
- B.
2. Improve skills in clinical diagnosis and management of challenging dermatologic conditions.
- C.
3. Develop therapeutic expertise of our Society members through case discussions highlighting dilemmas.
- D.
Understand why continuous certification serves the public and out profession.
- E.
Learn some novel techniques that will assist a cutaneous reconstructive practice.
- 8.As a result of participating in this activity, the primary thing I would do differently at my practice is:
- 9.What might prevent you from making changes?
- A.
Not applicable to my practice/role
- B.
Limited resources (no staff, no time, money)
- C.
Further training
- D.
Reimbursement issues
- E.
Resistance to change (by me, staff or health systems etc.
- F.
Other
- 10.Was the activity free of commercial bias?
- A.
Yes
- B.
No
- 11.If the program was not free of commercial bias, please explain.
- 12.What practice areas could you use additional training in to practice more effectively?
- 13.Other comments:
Back to top