Mds April 24, 2015 Mtg With MOC

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By MNDERM
M
MNDERM
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 2 | Total Attempts: 316
| Attempts: 52
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/13 Questions

    As a result of participating in this activity, the primary thing I would do differently at my practice is:

Please wait...
About This Quiz

This quiz evaluates the content and presentation skills of Dr. Randall Roenigk from the MDS April 24, 2015 meeting with MOC. It assesses the value of patient viewing, case quality, and the helpfulness of patient protocols, aiming to enhance medical competence and patient outcomes.

Mds April 24, 2015 Mtg With MOC - Quiz

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    What practice areas could you use additional training in to practice more effectively?

  • 3. 

    Other comments:

  • 4. 

    If the program was not free of commercial bias, please explain.

  • 5. 

    Rate Randall Roenigk, MD on content and presentation skills.

    • Excellent

    • Good

    • Fair

    • Poor

    Correct Answer
    A. Excellent
    Explanation
    Randall Roenigk, MD is rated as excellent on content and presentation skills. This suggests that he has a strong command of the subject matter and is able to effectively communicate it to his audience. His presentations are likely to be engaging, informative, and well-organized. Overall, he is highly skilled in both the content he delivers and the way he presents it.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    Did you find  Patient Viewing Valuable?

    • Yes

    • No

    Correct Answer
    A. Yes
    Explanation
    The given answer "Yes" suggests that the person found patient viewing valuable. This implies that they believe it is important or beneficial to be able to view patients. However, without further context or information, it is unclear why the person found patient viewing valuable.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Did you find the quality of cases valuable?

    • Yes

    • No

    Correct Answer
    A. Yes
    Explanation
    The given answer suggests that the person found the quality of cases valuable. This implies that they believe the cases provided were of good quality and were beneficial in some way. However, without further context or information, it is difficult to determine the specific reasons why the person found the cases valuable.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Did you find the patient protocols helpful?

    • Yes

    • No

    Correct Answer
    A. Yes
    Explanation
    The given answer suggests that the person found the patient protocols helpful. This implies that the protocols provided them with useful information or guidance in relation to their condition or treatment. It indicates a positive experience and satisfaction with the protocols.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    Which case(s) did you find the most educational?

    • Case 1: Extensive SCC in the Setting of Epidermolysis Bullosa

    • Case 2: Perianal SCC vs. Bowenoid Papulosis

    • Case 3: Intravascular BCC during Mohs Micrographic Surgery

    • Case 4: Voriconazole-induced SCCs

    • Case 5: Isolated Congenital Proliferative Melanocytic Nodule

    • Case 6: Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor

    • Case 7:Recurrent Aphthae in the Setting of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

    • Case 8: Self-healing Juvenile Cutaneous Mucinosis

    • Case 9: Kaposi Sarcoma

    • Case 10: Acquired von Willebrand Disease-associated Annular Purpura

    • Case 11: Inverse Atrophic Lichen Planus

    • Case 12: Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Surfactants in a Hypoallergenic Liquid Cleanser

  • 10. 

    Did this program achieve its primary objectives to change competence, performance and\or patient outcomes?  Check the objectives that were met.     

    • 1. Discuss new developments in diagnosis and treatment of various dermatologic conditions.

    • 2. Improve skills in clinical diagnosis and management of challenging dermatologic conditions.

    • 3. Develop therapeutic expertise of our Society members through case discussions highlighting dilemmas.

    • Understand why continuous certification serves the public and out profession.

    • Learn some novel techniques that will assist a cutaneous reconstructive practice.

  • 11. 

    Was the activity free of commercial bias?

    • Yes

    • No

    Correct Answer
    A. Yes
    Explanation
    If not, please specify why not?

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    Which case(s) did you find the Least educational?

    • Case 1: Extensive SCC in the Setting of Epidermolysis Bullosa

    • Case 2: Perianal SCC vs. Bowenoid Papulosis

    • Case 3: Intravascular BCC during Mohs Micrographic Surgery

    • Case 4: Voriconazole-induced SCCs

    • Case 5: Isolated Congenital Proliferative Melanocytic Nodule

    • Case 6: Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor

    • Case 7:Recurrent Aphthae in the Setting of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

    • Case 8: Self-healing Juvenile Cutaneous Mucinosis

    • Case 9: Kaposi Sarcoma

    • Case 10: Acquired von Willebrand Disease-associated Annular Purpura

    • Case 11: Inverse Atrophic Lichen Planus

    • Case 12: Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Surfactants in a Hypoallergenic Liquid Cleanser

  • 13. 

    What might prevent you from making changes?

    • Not applicable to my practice/role

    • Limited resources (no staff, no time, money)

    • Further training

    • Reimbursement issues

    • Resistance to change (by me, staff or health systems etc.

    • Other

    Correct Answer
    A. Not applicable to my practice/role
    Explanation
    Please explain other:

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Jun 14, 2024 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Jun 14, 2024
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Nov 24, 2014
    Quiz Created by
    MNDERM
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.