Just War & Christian Attitudes To CoNFLict: The Quiz

Thomas Aquinas is the correct answer because he is widely credited with developing the Just War theory. Aquinas was a medieval philosopher and theologian who sought to reconcile Christian ethics with the realities of warfare. He argued that war could be morally justified under certain conditions, such as self-defense or protecting innocent lives. Aquinas' Just War theory has had a significant influence on the development of international law and ethical considerations in warfare.

Pacifism is the correct answer because it aligns with the given definition that states "The doctrine that all violence is unjustifiable." Pacifism is the belief or doctrine that promotes non-violence and opposes war or any form of violence as a means to achieve goals or resolve conflicts. It emphasizes peaceful solutions and the rejection of the use of force. Therefore, pacifism is the best fit for the given definition.

The correct answer is The Quakers. The Quakers, also known as the Religious Society of Friends, are well-known for their pacifism and objection to all conflict. They believe in nonviolence and strive for peaceful resolutions to conflicts.

In order for a war to be considered just, there must be a 'reasonable chance' of success. This means that there should be a reasonable probability of achieving the goals and objectives of the war. Without a reasonable chance of success, engaging in a war would be seen as futile and unjustifiable. The concept of just war theory emphasizes the importance of proportionality and the likelihood of achieving a just outcome before resorting to armed conflict.

In the context of Just War theory, the 'N' word that must have been tried and failed as a condition is negotiation or negotiations. Just War theory suggests that before resorting to war, all peaceful means, including negotiation, should be exhausted in order to resolve conflicts. The use of the plural form "Negotiations" in the answer indicates that multiple attempts at negotiation may have been made, but they were unsuccessful in achieving a resolution.

This quote is from the Bible, specifically from the book of Exodus in the Old Testament. It is part of the Mosaic Law, which was given to the Israelites by God. The phrase "tooth for tooth" is a principle of justice and fairness, known as the principle of retaliation or lex talionis. It means that if someone causes harm or injury to another person, the punishment should be proportional to the harm caused. In this context, it means that if someone causes serious injury to another person, they should receive a punishment that is equal to the harm they caused, such as losing a tooth.

The answer is false because not all of the evidence in the Bible supports the statement that Jesus was a pacifist. While there are instances where Jesus promotes peace and non-violence, there are also instances where he displays anger and takes actions that can be interpreted as non-pacifistic. For example, Jesus overturning the tables of the money changers in the temple can be seen as a non-pacifistic act. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that all of the evidence in the Bible supports the statement that Jesus was a pacifist.

In a Just War, one of the conditions is that civilians must not be involved in the conflict. This means that innocent non-combatants should be protected and not targeted or harmed during the war. The aim is to minimize civilian casualties and ensure that they are not subjected to the violence and destruction of war. By excluding civilians from the conflict, it promotes the idea of proportionality and the ethical conduct of warfare.

A Holy War is a war fought to protect the religion of the people concerned. This type of war is often seen as a sacred duty and is fought with the belief that it is sanctioned by a higher power. The goal of a Holy War is to defend or spread a particular religious belief or ideology. This can involve fighting against those who threaten or oppose the religion, or it can involve converting others to the religion through force if necessary. The religious aspect is central to the motivation and justification for the war.

Based on the information given, we can be sure that Louisa is a conscientious objector. This is because she publicly disagrees with war and refuses to fight, which aligns with the definition of a conscientious objector - someone who opposes war on moral or religious grounds and refuses to participate in military activities. The other options, such as being a Christian, ambulance driver, Quaker, or teacher, cannot be confirmed based on the given information.