Fis The End Of The Articles Of Confederation
This quiz will assess your essential knowledge of our objective. You will need to take this quiz until you pass it with at least an 85%.
- 1.
What did Shay's Rebellion show the United States?
- A.
People can be violent
- B.
Armed rebellion was possible
- C.
The national government could not enforce laws regarding armed rebellion
- D.
Both "B" and "C"
Correct Answer
D. Both "B" and "C"Explanation
Shay's Rebellion, which took place in Massachusetts in 1786-1787, demonstrated that armed rebellion was possible in the United States. The rebellion was led by farmers who were struggling with debt and high taxes, and they took up arms against the state government. This event highlighted the weaknesses of the national government at the time, as it was unable to effectively enforce laws regarding armed rebellion. Therefore, the correct answer is "Both 'B' and 'C'".Rate this question:
-
- 2.
Where did delegates first meet in 1786 to discuss issues related the interstate trade?
- A.
Philadelphia
- B.
Boston
- C.
Annapolis
- D.
Pennsylvania
Correct Answer
C. AnnapolisExplanation
Delegates first met in Annapolis in 1786 to discuss issues related to interstate trade. Annapolis, the capital of Maryland, was chosen as the location for the meeting because it was a central location for the states involved. The meeting, known as the Annapolis Convention, was called to address the problems arising from the lack of a unified trade system among the states. Although the convention did not achieve its intended goals, it led to the calling of the Constitutional Convention the following year, which ultimately resulted in the drafting of the United States Constitution.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
What was decided at the first meeting in Maryland?
- A.
To hold another meeting of the delegates in New York
- B.
To meet in Philadelphia in May 1787 to discuss amending the the national government's ability to regulate interstate trade.
- C.
Alexander Hamilton would be the president of the new congress
- D.
None of the above
Correct Answer
B. To meet in Philadelphia in May 1787 to discuss amending the the national government's ability to regulate interstate trade.Explanation
At the first meeting in Maryland, it was decided that the delegates would meet in Philadelphia in May 1787 to discuss amending the national government's ability to regulate interstate trade. This decision indicates that the delegates recognized the need to address the issue of interstate trade regulation and saw the importance of convening a meeting to discuss potential amendments. The decision to meet in Philadelphia also suggests that the delegates believed it would be an appropriate and convenient location for the meeting.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Who did not participate in the May1787 meeting?
- A.
Massachusetts
- B.
Georgia
- C.
Pennsylvania
- D.
Rhode Island
Correct Answer
D. Rhode IslandExplanation
Rhode Island did not participate in the May 1787 meeting.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
What did the meeting of the 55 delegates become known as?
- A.
The Philadelphia Convention
- B.
The Articles of Confederation Convention
- C.
The Annapolis Convention
- D.
The Constitutional Convention
Correct Answer
D. The Constitutional ConventionExplanation
The meeting of the 55 delegates became known as the Constitutional Convention because it was during this convention that the United States Constitution was drafted and signed. The delegates gathered in Philadelphia to discuss and create a new framework for the government, as the previous Articles of Confederation were deemed inadequate. The result of the convention was the creation of the Constitution, which established the structure and powers of the federal government, as well as the rights and liberties of the American people.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
What are the 55 delegates at the 1787 convention known has historically?
- A.
Founding Brothers
- B.
Founding Fathers
- C.
Founding Leaders
- D.
Founding Delegates
Correct Answer
B. Founding FathersExplanation
The 55 delegates at the 1787 convention are known historically as the Founding Fathers. These individuals played a crucial role in drafting and signing the United States Constitution, establishing the framework for the new nation. They were influential figures such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, who laid the foundation for the principles and values that shaped the country. The term "Founding Fathers" recognizes their significant contributions to the birth of the United States.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
What did all delegates agree on regarding the 1787 Convention?
- A.
People's rights should be protected.
- B.
The Articles of Confederation should only amended, not thrown out and re-created.
- C.
The new government would be a republic.
- D.
All of the above
Correct Answer
A. People's rights should be protected.Explanation
All delegates at the 1787 Convention agreed that people's rights should be protected. This implies that they recognized the importance of safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring that the government would not infringe upon them. This agreement reflects a fundamental principle of democracy and was likely a crucial aspect of the discussions and decisions made during the convention. The other options mentioned, such as amending the Articles of Confederation and establishing a republic, may have been points of contention or alternative proposals, but the protection of people's rights was a shared consensus among all delegates.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
Who was elected as president of the Convention?
- A.
James Madison
- B.
Patrick Henry
- C.
George Washington
- D.
John Adams
Correct Answer
C. George WashingtonExplanation
George Washington was elected as president of the Convention because he was highly respected and admired by his peers. He had already established himself as a capable leader during the American Revolutionary War and was known for his integrity and strong moral character. Washington's experience and leadership qualities made him the ideal candidate to preside over the Convention and guide the discussions and debates towards a successful outcome.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
Who proposed the Virginia Plan?
- A.
George Washington
- B.
John Adams
- C.
Edmund Randolph
- D.
Alexander Hamilton
Correct Answer
C. Edmund RandolphExplanation
Edmund Randolph proposed the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan was a proposal for a new form of government presented at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It called for a strong central government with three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The plan also proposed a bicameral legislature, with representation based on population, which favored larger states. Randolph, who was the Governor of Virginia at the time, played a key role in shaping the plan and presenting it to the convention.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
How many branches of government did the proposed Virginia Plan present?
- A.
3
- B.
2
- C.
1
- D.
4
Correct Answer
A. 3Explanation
The proposed Virginia Plan presented three branches of government. This plan, put forward by James Madison, formed the basis for the structure of the U.S. Constitution. It called for a separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The legislative branch would be responsible for making laws, the executive branch would be responsible for enforcing laws, and the judicial branch would be responsible for interpreting laws. This system of checks and balances was designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
How many houses were included in the legislature of the Virginia Plan?
- A.
1--unicameral
- B.
2--bicameral
- C.
3--tricameral
- D.
None of the above
Correct Answer
B. 2--bicameralExplanation
The correct answer is 2--bicameral. The Virginia Plan proposed a legislature with two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate. This system of having two separate chambers was seen as a way to balance the power between larger and smaller states, as well as to provide checks and balances within the legislative branch.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
How would the number of representatives for each state be determined under the Virginia Plan?
- A.
Based on the wealth of the state
- B.
Based on the population of the state
- C.
Based on both the population and the wealth of the state
- D.
Only one representative per state
Correct Answer
C. Based on both the population and the wealth of the stateExplanation
Under the Virginia Plan, the number of representatives for each state would be determined based on both the population and the wealth of the state. This plan proposed a bicameral legislature in which the number of representatives in the lower house would be determined by the population of each state, while the upper house would have equal representation for each state. This system aimed to balance the influence of both large and small states, taking into account both their population and economic power.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
Who proposed the alternative to the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan?
- A.
Edmund Randolph
- B.
George Washington
- C.
William Peterson
- D.
Thomas Jefferson
Correct Answer
C. William PetersonExplanation
The correct answer is William Peterson. He proposed the alternative to the Virginia Plan, known as the New Jersey Plan, during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The New Jersey Plan advocated for a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, regardless of size or population. This was in contrast to the Virginia Plan, which proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
What made the New Jersey plan different than the Virginia Plan?
- A.
Only one "house" in the New Jersey Plan
- B.
Each state would have only one vote
- C.
No executive in the new government
- D.
Both "A" and "B" are correct
Correct Answer
D. Both "A" and "B" are correctExplanation
The New Jersey Plan differed from the Virginia Plan in two ways. First, it proposed having only one "house" in the government, whereas the Virginia Plan suggested a bicameral legislature. Second, in the New Jersey Plan, each state would have only one vote, whereas the Virginia Plan called for representation based on population. These differences highlight contrasting views on the structure and representation in the government.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
What was the end result of the Virginia Plan/New Jersey Plan debate called?
- A.
Great Compromise
- B.
Three-Fifths Compromise
- C.
Connecticut Compromise
- D.
Both "A" and "C"
Correct Answer
D. Both "A" and "C"Explanation
The end result of the Virginia Plan/New Jersey Plan debate was called the Great Compromise and the Connecticut Compromise. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a compromise between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan that created a bicameral legislature with representation based on both population (Virginia Plan) and equal representation for each state (New Jersey Plan). Therefore, the correct answer is "Both 'A' and 'C'."Rate this question:
-
- 16.
What did the "end result" look like between the Virginia Plan/New Jersey Plan?
- A.
New government would have two houses--one based on population the other would have equal representation.
- B.
New government would have one house--based on equal population for all states.
- C.
New government would have two houses--one based on population and the other based on wealth of each state
- D.
Both "a" and "c" are correct
Correct Answer
A. New government would have two houses--one based on population the other would have equal representation.Explanation
The "end result" between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan was that the new government would have two houses. One house would be based on population, giving more representation to states with larger populations. The other house would have equal representation, giving each state an equal say regardless of population size. This compromise was reached to address the concerns of both larger and smaller states and ensure a fair balance of power in the new government.Rate this question:
-
- 17.
What was at the heart of the slavery argument during the 1787 Convention?
- A.
Whether slavery would be made illegal
- B.
Whether the South could base their representative numbers on their total population, including slaves
- C.
Whether the new government could tax slave sales and other slave transactions
- D.
None of the above
Correct Answer
B. Whether the South could base their representative numbers on their total population, including slavesExplanation
During the 1787 Convention, the heart of the slavery argument was whether the South could count their total population, including slaves, for the purpose of determining their representative numbers. This issue was significant because it would directly affect the political power of the Southern states in the new government. The Northern states opposed this idea as they believed it would give the South disproportionate influence in decision-making. The question of whether slavery would be made illegal or if the new government could tax slave transactions were also important issues, but they were not the central focus of the slavery argument during the convention.Rate this question:
-
- 18.
What was the final outcome of the slavery issue at the 1787 Convention?
- A.
Slavery was deemed illegal and all slaves were set free
- B.
Slave owners could only keep their slaves if they paid an upfront "slave tax" to the new federal governemnt
- C.
Slaves would be counted as "three-fifths" of a human--thus adding only three-fifths to slave owning states' populations
- D.
Both "B" and "C"
Correct Answer
C. Slaves would be counted as "three-fifths" of a human--thus adding only three-fifths to slave owning states' populationsExplanation
The final outcome of the slavery issue at the 1787 Convention was that slaves would be counted as "three-fifths" of a human, thus adding only three-fifths to slave owning states' populations. This compromise, known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, was reached between Northern and Southern states and was included in the United States Constitution. It allowed Southern states to have greater representation in Congress based on their slave population, while also acknowledging the humanity of slaves to some extent.Rate this question:
-
- 19.
What was the decision made on slave trading?
- A.
Slave trading was illegal--only American-born slaves could be bought and sold
- B.
Slave trading could only be banned after 1808
- C.
Slave trading was banned--owners could only utilize the slaves they had currently and could not add any more to their plantations.
- D.
There was no compromise made on slave trading
Correct Answer
B. Slave trading could only be banned after 1808 -
- 20.
Regarding trade, what did Southern states not allow the new government to do regarding regulating trade?
- A.
Tax imports
- B.
Tax Exports
- C.
Tax products bought and sold to other states
- D.
Intervene when a trade issue surfaced between two states
Correct Answer
B. Tax ExportsExplanation
The Southern states did not allow the new government to tax exports. This means that they did not want the government to impose taxes on goods that were being sold and sent to other countries. By not allowing the taxation of exports, the Southern states were protecting their own economic interests and ensuring that their agricultural products, such as cotton and tobacco, would not be subject to additional costs that could hinder their competitiveness in international markets.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Mar 22, 2023Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Mar 05, 2010Quiz Created by
Pwhitehead
Back to top