English Composition 2 Final Exam

1. It is a beautiful morning/mourning!

Morning!

Mourning!

The given answer "morning!" is correct because the word "beautiful" suggests that the speaker is referring to a pleasant and delightful time of the day, which is typically the morning. On the other hand, "mourning" refers to the period of grief and sadness after a loss, which does not fit the context of the sentence. Therefore, "morning!" is the appropriate choice.

Explanation

The given answer "morning!" is correct because the word "beautiful" suggests that the speaker is referring to a pleasant and delightful time of the day, which is typically the morning. On the other hand, "mourning" refers to the period of grief and sadness after a loss, which does not fit the context of the sentence. Therefore, "morning!" is the appropriate choice.

2. Is this a valid argument?

"People have been trying for centuries to prove that God exists. But no one has yet been able to prove it. Therefore, God does not exist."

No. It is an argument from ignorance. Not finding something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Yes. If God exists we should have found Him by now.

The given answer is correct because it accurately identifies the argument as an argument from ignorance. The argument assumes that because no one has been able to prove the existence of God, it means that God does not exist. However, the absence of evidence does not necessarily prove the non-existence of something. Just because something has not been proven or found yet does not mean it does not exist. Therefore, the argument is flawed and not valid.

Explanation

The given answer is correct because it accurately identifies the argument as an argument from ignorance. The argument assumes that because no one has been able to prove the existence of God, it means that God does not exist. However, the absence of evidence does not necessarily prove the non-existence of something. Just because something has not been proven or found yet does not mean it does not exist. Therefore, the argument is flawed and not valid.

3. There were to/too/two many books to/too/two read and not enough time to read them.

To, too

Too, to

Two, too

To, two

Two, to

The correct answer is "too, to". "Too" is used to indicate excess or more than is needed, while "to" is used as a preposition before a verb or as part of an infinitive verb form. In this sentence, "too" is used to convey that there were an excessive number of books, and "to" is used to indicate the purpose or intention of reading them.

Explanation

The correct answer is "too, to". "Too" is used to indicate excess or more than is needed, while "to" is used as a preposition before a verb or as part of an infinitive verb form. In this sentence, "too" is used to convey that there were an excessive number of books, and "to" is used to indicate the purpose or intention of reading them.

4. I’d rather eat plain/plane yogurt instead of vanilla.

Plain

Plane

Either

Neither

The correct answer is "plain" because the sentence is expressing a preference for eating yogurt without any added flavor (plain) over eating yogurt with vanilla flavoring. The word "plane" does not make sense in this context, as it refers to an aircraft. "Either" and "neither" are not applicable as they do not convey a preference for one option over another.

Explanation

The correct answer is "plain" because the sentence is expressing a preference for eating yogurt without any added flavor (plain) over eating yogurt with vanilla flavoring. The word "plane" does not make sense in this context, as it refers to an aircraft. "Either" and "neither" are not applicable as they do not convey a preference for one option over another.

5. Micah dropped his pacifier down the hole/whole.

Hole.

Whole.

Either.

Neither.

The correct answer is "hole" because the sentence implies that Micah dropped his pacifier into a specific location, which is a hole. The word "whole" means complete or entire, and it does not make sense in this context. Therefore, "hole" is the appropriate choice.

Explanation

The correct answer is "hole" because the sentence implies that Micah dropped his pacifier into a specific location, which is a hole. The word "whole" means complete or entire, and it does not make sense in this context. Therefore, "hole" is the appropriate choice.

6. Please give these books to/too/two John.

To

Too

Two

A and B

B and C

The correct answer is "to" because in the sentence, "Please give these books to John," the word "to" is used to indicate the recipient of the action, which is John.

Explanation

The correct answer is "to" because in the sentence, "Please give these books to John," the word "to" is used to indicate the recipient of the action, which is John.

7. That movie had really cool special affects/effects.

Affects.

Effects.

Neither.

Either.

The correct answer is "effects." In this sentence, the word "effects" refers to the visual or audiovisual elements used in the movie to create a sense of realism or enhance the storytelling. The word "affects" is a verb that means to have an influence on something, while "effects" is a noun that refers to the result or consequence of something. Therefore, "effects" is the correct term to describe the special visual elements in the movie.

Explanation

The correct answer is "effects." In this sentence, the word "effects" refers to the visual or audiovisual elements used in the movie to create a sense of realism or enhance the storytelling. The word "affects" is a verb that means to have an influence on something, while "effects" is a noun that refers to the result or consequence of something. Therefore, "effects" is the correct term to describe the special visual elements in the movie.

8. What's wrong with this sentence?

Andrea Dworkin has written several books arguing that pornography harms women. But Dworkin is an ugly, bitter person, so you shouldn't listen to her.

"harms" should be "harm."

Her appearance and character don't have anything to do with the validity of her argument.

"pornography" should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The correct answer is that her appearance and character don't have anything to do with the validity of her argument. This is because the sentence is making a fallacious ad hominem attack by attacking the personal characteristics of Andrea Dworkin rather than addressing the substance of her argument. The validity of an argument should be evaluated based on the evidence and reasoning presented, not on the appearance or character of the person making the argument.

Explanation

The correct answer is that her appearance and character don't have anything to do with the validity of her argument. This is because the sentence is making a fallacious ad hominem attack by attacking the personal characteristics of Andrea Dworkin rather than addressing the substance of her argument. The validity of an argument should be evaluated based on the evidence and reasoning presented, not on the appearance or character of the person making the argument.

9. What's wrong with this sentence?

I work on my math homework as I talked on the phone.

"work" should be "worked."

There should be a comma after math.

"math homework" should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The sentence is in the past tense because "talked" is in the past tense. Therefore, the verb "work" should also be in the past tense to maintain consistency.

Explanation

The sentence is in the past tense because "talked" is in the past tense. Therefore, the verb "work" should also be in the past tense to maintain consistency.

10. True or False: It’s ok to borrow someone else's words and/or ideas without footnotes.

True

False

It is not okay to borrow someone else's words and/or ideas without footnotes. This is considered plagiarism, which is the act of using someone else's work without giving them proper credit. Plagiarism is a serious offense and can have severe consequences, both academically and professionally. It is important to always cite your sources and give credit to the original author or creator of the ideas or words you are using.

Explanation

It is not okay to borrow someone else's words and/or ideas without footnotes. This is considered plagiarism, which is the act of using someone else's work without giving them proper credit. Plagiarism is a serious offense and can have severe consequences, both academically and professionally. It is important to always cite your sources and give credit to the original author or creator of the ideas or words you are using.

11. Please right/rite/wright/write your name on everything you turn in.

Right

Rite

Wright

Write

The correct answer is "write" because it is the correct spelling for the action of putting words on paper or another surface. "Right" means correct or the opposite of left. "Rite" refers to a religious or ceremonial act. "Wright" is a surname or a term for a skilled worker or craftsman. Therefore, "write" is the only option that fits the context of the sentence.

Explanation

The correct answer is "write" because it is the correct spelling for the action of putting words on paper or another surface. "Right" means correct or the opposite of left. "Rite" refers to a religious or ceremonial act. "Wright" is a surname or a term for a skilled worker or craftsman. Therefore, "write" is the only option that fits the context of the sentence.

12. Is this a valid argument?

"Giving money to charity is the right thing to do. So charities have a right to our money."

Yes. Right means right. Therefore, it is right for charities to have our money.

No. The word "right" can refer to different things like morally correctness or something that is deserved.

This explanation correctly identifies that the word "right" can have different meanings. In the given argument, the phrase "charities have a right to our money" could be interpreted as meaning that charities morally deserve or are entitled to our money. However, the argument does not provide any justification for this claim, so it cannot be considered a valid argument.

Explanation

This explanation correctly identifies that the word "right" can have different meanings. In the given argument, the phrase "charities have a right to our money" could be interpreted as meaning that charities morally deserve or are entitled to our money. However, the argument does not provide any justification for this claim, so it cannot be considered a valid argument.

13. What's wrong with this sentence?

They used to go to the deli but now they goes to eat fast food.

"fast food" should be capitalized.

"goes" should be "go."

"deli" should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The verb "goes" should be changed to "go" in order to agree with the subject "they". The sentence is talking about a plural group of people ("they") who used to go to the deli but now go to eat fast food. Therefore, the correct form of the verb should be "go" to match the plural subject.

Explanation

The verb "goes" should be changed to "go" in order to agree with the subject "they". The sentence is talking about a plural group of people ("they") who used to go to the deli but now go to eat fast food. Therefore, the correct form of the verb should be "go" to match the plural subject.

14. Its/It’s getting late.

Its

It's

Its'

Either

Neither

The correct answer is "It's" because it is a contraction of "it is." In this sentence, "It's getting late" means "It is getting late."

Explanation

The correct answer is "It's" because it is a contraction of "it is." In this sentence, "It's getting late" means "It is getting late."

15. Is this a valid argument?

Grading this exam on a curve would be the most fair thing to do. After all, classes go more smoothly when the students and the professor are getting along well.

No. Fairness has nothing to do with classes going smoothly.

Yes. Grading on a curve is always fair.

The given answer is correct because it correctly identifies that fairness and the smoothness of classes are two separate issues. Grading on a curve may or may not be fair, but its fairness does not guarantee that classes will go smoothly. The argument in the question assumes a connection between fairness and smoothness, which is not necessarily true.

Explanation

The given answer is correct because it correctly identifies that fairness and the smoothness of classes are two separate issues. Grading on a curve may or may not be fair, but its fairness does not guarantee that classes will go smoothly. The argument in the question assumes a connection between fairness and smoothness, which is not necessarily true.

16. What's wrong with this sentence?

President Jones raised taxes, and then the rate of violent crime went up. Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.

Should be "rised taxes"

Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate.

Comma should come after Jones.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate." The sentence suggests that President Jones raising taxes caused the rate of violent crime to increase. However, the sentence does not provide any evidence or explanation to support this connection. It is important to have evidence or a logical explanation to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between two events. Without this support, it is not valid to conclude that Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.

Explanation

The correct answer is "Unsupported connection between the raising of taxes and the crime rate." The sentence suggests that President Jones raising taxes caused the rate of violent crime to increase. However, the sentence does not provide any evidence or explanation to support this connection. It is important to have evidence or a logical explanation to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between two events. Without this support, it is not valid to conclude that Jones is responsible for the rise in crime.

17. What's wrong with this sentence?

Guns are like hammers--they're both tools with metal parts that could be used to kill someone. And yet, it would be ridiculous to restrict the purchase of hammers--so restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous.

There should not be a comma after yet.

The similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety.

Ridiculous is not used properly.

Nothing.

The given correct answer states that the sentence is wrong because the similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety. The sentence is discussing the idea that restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous as restricting the purchase of hammers. However, the argument is flawed because it fails to address the main concern of gun safety and the potential harm that guns can cause. The comparison between guns and hammers is irrelevant in this context.

Explanation

The given correct answer states that the sentence is wrong because the similarities between guns and hammers do not have anything to do with the main concern of gun safety. The sentence is discussing the idea that restrictions on purchasing guns are equally ridiculous as restricting the purchase of hammers. However, the argument is flawed because it fails to address the main concern of gun safety and the potential harm that guns can cause. The comparison between guns and hammers is irrelevant in this context.

18. Could you stop by/bye/buy the store to by/bye/buy some cheese for me?

By, bye

Bye, buy

Buy, by

By, buy

Bye, by

The correct answer is "by, buy" because the sentence is asking someone to stop at the store in order to purchase some cheese. "By" is incorrect as it does not make sense in this context, and "bye" is also incorrect as it is a farewell word and does not fit the sentence. "Buy" is the correct word to use in this sentence as it indicates the action of purchasing the cheese.

Explanation

The correct answer is "by, buy" because the sentence is asking someone to stop at the store in order to purchase some cheese. "By" is incorrect as it does not make sense in this context, and "bye" is also incorrect as it is a farewell word and does not fit the sentence. "Buy" is the correct word to use in this sentence as it indicates the action of purchasing the cheese.

19. Whatʼs wrong with this sentence?

"In todayʼs culture Christianity has created its own sterile sub-culture."

A comma should go after Christianity.

Culture should be capitalized.

A comma should go after culture.

Nothing.

The given sentence is incorrect because it is missing a comma after the word "culture." The correct sentence should be: "In today's culture, Christianity has created its own sterile sub-culture." The comma is necessary to separate the introductory phrase "In today's culture" from the main clause "Christianity has created its own sterile sub-culture."

Explanation

The given sentence is incorrect because it is missing a comma after the word "culture." The correct sentence should be: "In today's culture, Christianity has created its own sterile sub-culture." The comma is necessary to separate the introductory phrase "In today's culture" from the main clause "Christianity has created its own sterile sub-culture."

20. Is this a valid argument?

I know the exam is graded based on performance, but you should give me an A. My cat has been sick, my car broke down, and I've had a cold, so it was really hard for me to study!

Yes. The professor is logically obligated to award the student an A.

No. People who have hard weeks are not entitled to A's.

The answer states that people who have hard weeks are not entitled to A's. This implies that the student's argument, which is based on personal difficulties, is not a valid reason for receiving an A. The answer suggests that the professor should not be logically obligated to award the student an A based on the circumstances mentioned.

Explanation

The answer states that people who have hard weeks are not entitled to A's. This implies that the student's argument, which is based on personal difficulties, is not a valid reason for receiving an A. The answer suggests that the professor should not be logically obligated to award the student an A based on the circumstances mentioned.

21. Is this a valid argument?

Feminists want to ban all pornography and punish everyone who reads it! But such harsh measures are surely inappropriate, so the feminists are wrong: porn and its readers should be left in peace.

No. It exaggerates the feminist position and then discredits the exaggeration.

Yes. Harsh measures indicate that the person or group is completely wrong.

The given answer is correct because the argument presented in the statement is a straw man fallacy. It misrepresents the feminist position by exaggerating their stance on pornography and punishment. By discrediting the exaggerated version of the argument, it does not address the actual position of feminists and fails to provide a valid argument against their beliefs.

Explanation

The given answer is correct because the argument presented in the statement is a straw man fallacy. It misrepresents the feminist position by exaggerating their stance on pornography and punishment. By discrediting the exaggerated version of the argument, it does not address the actual position of feminists and fails to provide a valid argument against their beliefs.

22. What's wrong with this sentence?

Until the government is ran by the Prince of Peace, there will be problems.

"Prince of Peace" should not be capitalized.

"Problems" should be "problem's."

Ran is past-tense.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "Ran is past-tense." The verb "is" should be followed by the present tense form of the verb, so it should be "Until the government is run by the Prince of Peace..."

Explanation

The correct answer is "Ran is past-tense." The verb "is" should be followed by the present tense form of the verb, so it should be "Until the government is run by the Prince of Peace..."

23.

Should every footnoted source also appear in the bibliography?

Yes.

Only the ones you think are important.

No.

Every footnoted source should also appear in the bibliography because the bibliography is a comprehensive list of all the sources that were consulted and cited in the work. It allows readers to easily locate and verify the sources used by the author. By including all footnoted sources in the bibliography, the author ensures transparency and credibility in their research.

Explanation

Every footnoted source should also appear in the bibliography because the bibliography is a comprehensive list of all the sources that were consulted and cited in the work. It allows readers to easily locate and verify the sources used by the author. By including all footnoted sources in the bibliography, the author ensures transparency and credibility in their research.

24. Which date format is not acceptable?

January 1, 2009.

01/01/09.

1/1/2009.

01/01/9.

The date format "01/01/9" is not acceptable because it does not include the full year. The standard date format usually includes the month, day, and four-digit year. In this case, the year is written as "9" instead of "2009" or "09", which is not a commonly used or recognized format.

Explanation

The date format "01/01/9" is not acceptable because it does not include the full year. The standard date format usually includes the month, day, and four-digit year. In this case, the year is written as "9" instead of "2009" or "09", which is not a commonly used or recognized format.

25. If an assignment requires a 300-600 word count, how many words should be in the body of the paper?

250.

300, including the cover page and bibliography.

Between 300 and 600 words, not counting the cover page or bibliography.

601.

700.

The question asks for the word count of the body of the paper, excluding the cover page and bibliography. The correct answer states that the body of the paper should have between 300 and 600 words. This means that the cover page and bibliography are not included in the word count requirement.

Explanation

The question asks for the word count of the body of the paper, excluding the cover page and bibliography. The correct answer states that the body of the paper should have between 300 and 600 words. This means that the cover page and bibliography are not included in the word count requirement.

26. How do you cite/site/sight a web cite/site/sight in a formal paper?

Cite, site

Cite, sight

Site, cite

Site, sight

Sight, site

In a formal paper, it is important to properly cite any sources that were used. This includes web sources. The correct way to cite a web source in a formal paper is to use the word "cite." Additionally, when referring to a specific website or webpage, the word "site" should be used. Therefore, the correct answer is "cite, site."

Explanation

In a formal paper, it is important to properly cite any sources that were used. This includes web sources. The correct way to cite a web source in a formal paper is to use the word "cite." Additionally, when referring to a specific website or webpage, the word "site" should be used. Therefore, the correct answer is "cite, site."

27. What's wrong with this sentence?

We should abolish the death penalty. Many respected people, such as actor Guy Handsome, have publicly stated their opposition to it.

Actor should be capitalized.

"Abolish" is not used properly.

Mr. Handsome's opinion does not necessarily make something true.

Nothing.

The given correct answer states that "Mr. Handsome's opinion does not necessarily make something true." This is a valid explanation because the sentence is implying that the death penalty should be abolished based on the opinion of actor Guy Handsome. However, just because a respected person like Mr. Handsome opposes the death penalty, it does not mean that abolishing it is the correct or universally accepted decision. Public opinion alone does not determine the validity or correctness of an argument or statement.

Explanation

The given correct answer states that "Mr. Handsome's opinion does not necessarily make something true." This is a valid explanation because the sentence is implying that the death penalty should be abolished based on the opinion of actor Guy Handsome. However, just because a respected person like Mr. Handsome opposes the death penalty, it does not mean that abolishing it is the correct or universally accepted decision. Public opinion alone does not determine the validity or correctness of an argument or statement.

28. What's wrong with this sentence?

Aside from Carter’s pacifist reasoning behind not believing a Christian should be involved in government, and most likely law enforcement, separation from culture does not make sense for two reasons.

Run-on sentence.

Pacifist should be capitalized.

Sense should be since.

Nothing.

The given correct answer is "Run-on sentence." This is because the sentence is too long and contains multiple independent clauses that are not properly connected. It should be broken down into shorter sentences or connected with appropriate punctuation to make it more clear and concise.

Explanation

The given correct answer is "Run-on sentence." This is because the sentence is too long and contains multiple independent clauses that are not properly connected. It should be broken down into shorter sentences or connected with appropriate punctuation to make it more clear and concise.

29. What's wrong with this sentence?

Jerusalem is representing the neighborhood in which the Disciples and Apostles lived.

"is representing" should be represents.

Neighborhood should be capitalized.

A comma should come after Jerusalem.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "is representing" should be represents. The verb "represents" should be used instead of "is representing" to maintain proper subject-verb agreement. Since "Jerusalem" is a proper noun, it should be capitalized. Additionally, a comma should be placed after "Jerusalem" to separate the subject from the verb.

Explanation

The correct answer is "is representing" should be represents. The verb "represents" should be used instead of "is representing" to maintain proper subject-verb agreement. Since "Jerusalem" is a proper noun, it should be capitalized. Additionally, a comma should be placed after "Jerusalem" to separate the subject from the verb.

30. What's wrong with this sentence?

The idea of Christians not becoming politicians is not an unreasonable argument.

Politicians should be capitalized.

It is awkwardly phrased.

There should be an apostrophe after Christian.

Nothing.

The given sentence "The idea of Christians not becoming politicians is not an unreasonable argument" is awkwardly phrased because it could be rephrased to improve clarity and readability.

Explanation

The given sentence "The idea of Christians not becoming politicians is not an unreasonable argument" is awkwardly phrased because it could be rephrased to improve clarity and readability.

31. I took my car to the shop on my lunch brake/break to get the brakes/breaks fixed.

Brake, brakes

Break, breaks

Break, brakes

Brake, breaks

The correct answer is "break, brakes" because in the sentence, the word "break" is used as a noun to refer to a pause or interval of time, while "brakes" is used as a noun to refer to the mechanical device used to stop or slow down a vehicle.

Explanation

The correct answer is "break, brakes" because in the sentence, the word "break" is used as a noun to refer to a pause or interval of time, while "brakes" is used as a noun to refer to the mechanical device used to stop or slow down a vehicle.

32. What's wrong with these sentences?

There are many fields of study that will be harder than others when it comes to being a Christian. Even though there are harder fields, it takes the same amount of work for the easier ones.

It is vague and doesn't really say anything.

"fields of study" should be capitalized.

"comes" should be "come's"

Nothing.

The given answer is correct because the sentences lack clarity and do not convey a clear message. The statement "There are many fields of study that will be harder than others when it comes to being a Christian" is vague and does not provide specific examples or explanations. Additionally, the statement "Even though there are harder fields, it takes the same amount of work for the easier ones" is contradictory and does not make logical sense. Overall, the sentences fail to effectively communicate a coherent idea.

Explanation

The given answer is correct because the sentences lack clarity and do not convey a clear message. The statement "There are many fields of study that will be harder than others when it comes to being a Christian" is vague and does not provide specific examples or explanations. Additionally, the statement "Even though there are harder fields, it takes the same amount of work for the easier ones" is contradictory and does not make logical sense. Overall, the sentences fail to effectively communicate a coherent idea.

33. What's wrong with this sentence?

I saw a house in the distance, but the windows are all dark.

"saw" should be "seen."

"are" should be "were."

"windows" should be "window's"

Nothing.

The sentence is describing an event that happened in the past, so the verb "are" should be changed to "were" to maintain the correct tense.

Explanation

The sentence is describing an event that happened in the past, so the verb "are" should be changed to "were" to maintain the correct tense.

34. What's wrong with this sentence?

The seriousness of a punishment should match the seriousness of the crime. Right now, the punishment for drunk driving may simply be a fine. But drunk driving is a very serious crime that can kill innocent people. So the death penalty should be the punishment for drunk driving.

It makes drunk driving more serious than it is.

It assumes the innocence of humanity.

It makes the death penalty seem like the only proper punishment.

Nothing.

The given sentence suggests that the death penalty should be the only punishment for drunk driving, which implies that no other forms of punishment, such as imprisonment or license suspension, are appropriate. This assumption is problematic as it fails to consider alternative methods of punishment that could effectively deter and rehabilitate offenders. Additionally, the severity of the death penalty may not align with the seriousness of the crime for everyone, leading to potential ethical concerns.

Explanation

The given sentence suggests that the death penalty should be the only punishment for drunk driving, which implies that no other forms of punishment, such as imprisonment or license suspension, are appropriate. This assumption is problematic as it fails to consider alternative methods of punishment that could effectively deter and rehabilitate offenders. Additionally, the severity of the death penalty may not align with the seriousness of the crime for everyone, leading to potential ethical concerns.

35. What’s wrong with this sentence?

Christians are not supposed to control anyone, but rather show people God’s reign in their own life, and the change that has come through that.

"Christians are not supposed to control anyone" is awkwardly phrased.

"the change that has come through that" is awkwardly phrased.

Reign should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given correct answer is that "the change that has come through that" is awkwardly phrased. This is because the phrase is redundant and could be simplified.

Explanation

The given correct answer is that "the change that has come through that" is awkwardly phrased. This is because the phrase is redundant and could be simplified.

36. I am so greatful/grateful for my wonderful family.

Greatful

Grateful

Either

Neither

The correct answer is "grateful." The word "grateful" means feeling or showing appreciation for something or someone. In the given sentence, the speaker expresses their gratitude towards their wonderful family. The word "greatful" is incorrect as it is a misspelling of "grateful." Therefore, the correct answer is "grateful."

Explanation

The correct answer is "grateful." The word "grateful" means feeling or showing appreciation for something or someone. In the given sentence, the speaker expresses their gratitude towards their wonderful family. The word "greatful" is incorrect as it is a misspelling of "grateful." Therefore, the correct answer is "grateful."

37. What's wrong with this sentence?

Animal experimentation reduces our respect for life. If we don't respect life, we are likely to be more and more tolerant of violent acts like war and murder. Soon our society will become a battlefield in which everyone constantly fears for their lives. It will be the end of civilization. To prevent this terrible consequence, we should make animal experimentation illegal right now.

Animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder.

"To prevent this terrible consequence" should come after "right now."

Civilization should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given correct answer explains that the sentence "Animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder" is incorrect. The sentence in the original passage suggests that if animal experimentation continues, it will lead to a lack of respect for life, which in turn will lead to tolerance of violent acts like war and murder. The correct answer points out that this connection between animal experimentation and war/murder is not supported or proven.

Explanation

The given correct answer explains that the sentence "Animal experimentation does not actually lead to war or murder" is incorrect. The sentence in the original passage suggests that if animal experimentation continues, it will lead to a lack of respect for life, which in turn will lead to tolerance of violent acts like war and murder. The correct answer points out that this connection between animal experimentation and war/murder is not supported or proven.

38. What's wrong with this sentence?

Gay marriages are just immoral. 70% of Americans think so!

Marriages should be capitalized.

There should be an apostrophe at the end of American.

Popular opinion doesn't determine morality.

Nothing.

The given sentence implies that the immorality of gay marriages is based on the fact that 70% of Americans think so. However, the correct answer states that popular opinion doesn't determine morality. This means that the moral judgment of an action or belief should not be solely based on the majority's opinion. Morality is subjective and can vary among individuals, so it cannot be determined solely by popular opinion.

Explanation

The given sentence implies that the immorality of gay marriages is based on the fact that 70% of Americans think so. However, the correct answer states that popular opinion doesn't determine morality. This means that the moral judgment of an action or belief should not be solely based on the majority's opinion. Morality is subjective and can vary among individuals, so it cannot be determined solely by popular opinion.

39. What’s wrong with this opening sentence?

There are many views on politics.

It is inaccurate.

It is a vague sentence that doesn't say anything.

Politics should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The opening sentence "There are many views on politics" is considered a vague sentence that doesn't convey any specific information. It lacks clarity and fails to provide any context or details about the topic of politics or the different views associated with it. Therefore, it is a weak and uninformative sentence.

Explanation

The opening sentence "There are many views on politics" is considered a vague sentence that doesn't convey any specific information. It lacks clarity and fails to provide any context or details about the topic of politics or the different views associated with it. Therefore, it is a weak and uninformative sentence.

40. What's wrong with this sentence?

I have been saving money for five months, but I kept spending it on my family.

"kept" should be "keep."

"have" should be "has."

"five months" should be "five-months."

Nothing.

The sentence is describing a past action of continuously spending money on the speaker's family. Since the sentence is in the past tense, the verb "kept" is the correct form to use to indicate this ongoing action. Using "keep" would imply that the action is still ongoing in the present, which is not the intended meaning.

Explanation

The sentence is describing a past action of continuously spending money on the speaker's family. Since the sentence is in the past tense, the verb "kept" is the correct form to use to indicate this ongoing action. Using "keep" would imply that the action is still ongoing in the present, which is not the intended meaning.

41. What’s wrong with this opening sentence?

Few things are as hard to understand as Systematic Theology.

"Systematic Theology" should not be capitalized.

It is a vague and inaccurate sentence.

There should be a comma after "hard."

Nothing.

The opening sentence "Few things are as hard to understand as Systematic Theology" is considered vague and inaccurate. This is because it does not provide any specific information about what makes Systematic Theology difficult to understand. Without further clarification or context, the sentence lacks clarity and precision, making it a vague statement.

Explanation

The opening sentence "Few things are as hard to understand as Systematic Theology" is considered vague and inaccurate. This is because it does not provide any specific information about what makes Systematic Theology difficult to understand. Without further clarification or context, the sentence lacks clarity and precision, making it a vague statement.

42. Tim chose/choose to play ball instead of doing his homework.

Chose

Choose

Either

Neither

The correct answer is "chose" because it agrees with the subject "Tim" and the past tense of the verb "chose" indicates that the action of playing ball instead of doing homework has already happened in the past.

Explanation

The correct answer is "chose" because it agrees with the subject "Tim" and the past tense of the verb "chose" indicates that the action of playing ball instead of doing homework has already happened in the past.

43. What's wrong with this sentence?

Through observing the natural world we have figured out how to harness the power of running water but we have not figured out why we are here.

"Through observing the natural world" is awkwardly phrased.

There should be a comma after "water."

"harness the power of running water" is awkwardly phrased.

Nothing.

The given correct answer suggests that the sentence is incorrect because there should be a comma after "water." This is because the sentence is a compound sentence with two independent clauses joined by the conjunction "but." In such cases, a comma is needed before the coordinating conjunction to separate the two clauses.

Explanation

The given correct answer suggests that the sentence is incorrect because there should be a comma after "water." This is because the sentence is a compound sentence with two independent clauses joined by the conjunction "but." In such cases, a comma is needed before the coordinating conjunction to separate the two clauses.

44. What's wrong with this sentence?

Last fall I took English Comp. 1; now I am taking English Comp. 2.

"took should be "take."

"now I am taking" should be "now I took."

"Comp." should not be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given sentence does not have any grammatical errors or mistakes. All the components of the sentence are correctly written and punctuated. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.

Explanation

The given sentence does not have any grammatical errors or mistakes. All the components of the sentence are correctly written and punctuated. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.

45. Is this a valid argument?

Active euthanasia is morally acceptable. It is a decent, ethical thing to help another human being escape suffering through death.

No. The second sentence just repeats the first sentence without proving its merit.

Yes. Since helping other human beings is ethical, euthanasia is also ethical.

The given answer is correct because it accurately identifies the flaw in the argument. The second sentence merely restates the first sentence without providing any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that active euthanasia is morally acceptable. In order for an argument to be valid, it must present logical and convincing evidence to support its claims. However, in this case, the argument fails to do so, making it invalid.

Explanation

The given answer is correct because it accurately identifies the flaw in the argument. The second sentence merely restates the first sentence without providing any evidence or reasoning to support the claim that active euthanasia is morally acceptable. In order for an argument to be valid, it must present logical and convincing evidence to support its claims. However, in this case, the argument fails to do so, making it invalid.

46. What's wrong with this sentence?

"My roommate said her philosophy class was hard, and the one I'm in is hard, too. All philosophy classes must be hard!"

Philosophy isn't hard.

There was not enough evidence to support that conclusion.

The evidence is invalid.

Nothing.

The given correct answer is "There was not enough evidence to support that conclusion." This is because the sentence presents a hasty generalization by assuming that all philosophy classes must be hard based on the experiences of two individuals. However, the experiences of just two people cannot be generalized to the entire population of philosophy classes. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to support the conclusion that all philosophy classes are hard.

Explanation

The given correct answer is "There was not enough evidence to support that conclusion." This is because the sentence presents a hasty generalization by assuming that all philosophy classes must be hard based on the experiences of two individuals. However, the experiences of just two people cannot be generalized to the entire population of philosophy classes. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to support the conclusion that all philosophy classes are hard.

47.

Should a page number appear on the cover page?

Yes. Always.

Sometimes. Only on informal papers.

No. Never.

A page number should not appear on the cover page because the cover page is typically considered as the first page of a document and is not usually numbered. The purpose of a cover page is to provide essential information about the document, such as the title, author, date, and any other relevant details. Including a page number on the cover page would be unnecessary and could potentially confuse readers.

Explanation

A page number should not appear on the cover page because the cover page is typically considered as the first page of a document and is not usually numbered. The purpose of a cover page is to provide essential information about the document, such as the title, author, date, and any other relevant details. Including a page number on the cover page would be unnecessary and could potentially confuse readers.

48. What’s wrong with this sentence?

This pizza has cheese pepperoni and mushrooms.

There should be a comma after cheese.

There should be a comma after "and"

There should be a comma after cheese and pepperoni.

Nothing.

The sentence "This pizza has cheese pepperoni and mushrooms" is missing a comma after the words "cheese" and "pepperoni". In a list of three or more items, a comma should be used to separate each item. Therefore, the correct version of the sentence would be "This pizza has cheese, pepperoni, and mushrooms."

Explanation

The sentence "This pizza has cheese pepperoni and mushrooms" is missing a comma after the words "cheese" and "pepperoni". In a list of three or more items, a comma should be used to separate each item. Therefore, the correct version of the sentence would be "This pizza has cheese, pepperoni, and mushrooms."

49. What's wrong with this sentence?

The ocean contains rich minerals that washed down from rivers and streams.

"minerals" should be "mineral."

There are commas missing.

"washed" is past tense.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "washed" is past tense. The sentence should be in present tense to maintain consistency.

Explanation

The correct answer is "washed" is past tense. The sentence should be in present tense to maintain consistency.

50. What's wrong with this sentence?

These are the rudiments of our faith and His will for us.

"are" should be "is."

"rudiments" is a poor word choice.

"will" should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The word "rudiments" is a poor word choice because it implies a basic or fundamental understanding of something, whereas the sentence suggests that the mentioned concepts are central or essential to the faith and God's will. A more suitable word could be "essence" or "fundamentals."

Explanation

The word "rudiments" is a poor word choice because it implies a basic or fundamental understanding of something, whereas the sentence suggests that the mentioned concepts are central or essential to the faith and God's will. A more suitable word could be "essence" or "fundamentals."

51. What’s wrong with this sentence?

Then he said, “Please return my laptop”.

"he" should be capitalized.

The period is on the wrong side of the quotation mark.

There should not be a comma after said.

Nothing.

In this sentence, the period is incorrectly placed on the wrong side of the quotation mark. According to standard punctuation rules, the period should be placed inside the quotation mark when it is part of the quoted material. Therefore, the correct placement should be: Then he said, "Please return my laptop."

Explanation

In this sentence, the period is incorrectly placed on the wrong side of the quotation mark. According to standard punctuation rules, the period should be placed inside the quotation mark when it is part of the quoted material. Therefore, the correct placement should be: Then he said, "Please return my laptop."

52. What's wrong with this opening sentence?

Since the dawn of time man has wondered whether toast always lands butter side down.

It is a vague and inaccurate statement.

Dawn of time should be capitalized.

Toast should be toasts.

Nothing.

The opening sentence is incorrect because it is a vague and inaccurate statement. It makes a generalization about the curiosity of mankind without providing any specific evidence or context. Additionally, the statement about toast always landing butter side down is not universally true and can vary depending on various factors.

Explanation

The opening sentence is incorrect because it is a vague and inaccurate statement. It makes a generalization about the curiosity of mankind without providing any specific evidence or context. Additionally, the statement about toast always landing butter side down is not universally true and can vary depending on various factors.

53. What’s wrong with this sentence?

Such questions are best answered in greater detail.

There are commas missing.

It is a vague sentence that doesn't say anything.

"answered" is past tense.

Nothing.

The given correct answer states that the sentence is vague and does not convey any specific information. This implies that the sentence lacks clarity and fails to provide a clear message or purpose. Without additional context or details, it is difficult to understand the intended meaning or purpose of the sentence.

Explanation

The given correct answer states that the sentence is vague and does not convey any specific information. This implies that the sentence lacks clarity and fails to provide a clear message or purpose. Without additional context or details, it is difficult to understand the intended meaning or purpose of the sentence.

54. When an assignment asks for a specific word count, what does it include?

The cover page, all of the professor's credentials, the actual body of text, and the bibliography.

The cover page and the actual body of text.

The body of text and the bibliography.

Only the body of the text.

The word count for an assignment only includes the body of the text. This means that the cover page, professor's credentials, and bibliography are not included in the word count. The word count is specifically focused on the content and length of the actual written work, excluding any additional pages or sections.

Explanation

The word count for an assignment only includes the body of the text. This means that the cover page, professor's credentials, and bibliography are not included in the word count. The word count is specifically focused on the content and length of the actual written work, excluding any additional pages or sections.

55. What’s wrong with this sentence?

However, one key to remember is that acting like a Christian does not make a person one.

Sentences never begin with "However."

It is awkwardly phrased and unclear.

"Christian" should not be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given sentence is considered to be awkwardly phrased and unclear. This is because the sentence structure and wording make it difficult to understand the intended meaning. The phrase "acting like a Christian does not make a person one" is not clearly explained or expanded upon, leaving the reader to interpret its significance. A clearer and more concise phrasing could improve the sentence's clarity and effectiveness in conveying the intended message.

Explanation

The given sentence is considered to be awkwardly phrased and unclear. This is because the sentence structure and wording make it difficult to understand the intended meaning. The phrase "acting like a Christian does not make a person one" is not clearly explained or expanded upon, leaving the reader to interpret its significance. A clearer and more concise phrasing could improve the sentence's clarity and effectiveness in conveying the intended message.

56. What’s wrong with this opening sentence?

In a world with so many different views regarding culture, morals, ethics, religion, and economics, government is a necessary institution to maintain civility within a nation.

It is a vague and irrelevant sentence.

Not enough commas.

"religion" should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The opening sentence is considered vague and irrelevant because it does not provide any specific information or context. It makes a general statement about the necessity of government in a world with diverse views, but it does not explain why or how government is necessary for maintaining civility within a nation. The sentence lacks clarity and fails to establish a clear argument or purpose.

Explanation

The opening sentence is considered vague and irrelevant because it does not provide any specific information or context. It makes a general statement about the necessity of government in a world with diverse views, but it does not explain why or how government is necessary for maintaining civility within a nation. The sentence lacks clarity and fails to establish a clear argument or purpose.

57. What's wrong with this sentence?

I wanted to go with him to town, but he wants me to stay home and rest.

"wanted" should be "wants."

"but" should be "but also."

"he wants" should be "he wanted."

Nothing.

The sentence is in the past tense, as indicated by the verb "wanted." However, the verb "wants" is in the present tense, which creates a mismatch in verb tense. To maintain consistency, the verb should be in the past tense, so "he wants" should be corrected to "he wanted."

Explanation

The sentence is in the past tense, as indicated by the verb "wanted." However, the verb "wants" is in the present tense, which creates a mismatch in verb tense. To maintain consistency, the verb should be in the past tense, so "he wants" should be corrected to "he wanted."

58. What's wrong with this sentence?

The children love their new tree house, which they built themselves.

"children" should be "childrens."

"new" should be "knew."

"built" should be "build."

Nothing.

The given sentence is grammatically correct. There are no errors in it. The subject "children" is plural and does not require an apostrophe or the addition of an "s" at the end. The word "new" correctly describes the tree house as recently acquired. The verb "built" is in the past tense, which is appropriate for an action that has already been completed. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.

Explanation

The given sentence is grammatically correct. There are no errors in it. The subject "children" is plural and does not require an apostrophe or the addition of an "s" at the end. The word "new" correctly describes the tree house as recently acquired. The verb "built" is in the past tense, which is appropriate for an action that has already been completed. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.

59. Is this a valid argument?

Caldwell Hall is in bad shape. Either we tear it down and put up a new building, or we continue to risk students' safety. Obviously we shouldn't risk anyone's safety, so we must tear the building down.

Yes. It's clear that the hall is a risk and should be torn down.

No. It neglects other possibilities like repair or not using specific rooms.

The given argument is not valid because it only presents two options - tearing down the building or risking students' safety. It neglects other possibilities such as repairing the building or not using specific rooms that may address the safety concerns. Therefore, the argument is incomplete and does not consider all possible solutions.

Explanation

The given argument is not valid because it only presents two options - tearing down the building or risking students' safety. It neglects other possibilities such as repairing the building or not using specific rooms that may address the safety concerns. Therefore, the argument is incomplete and does not consider all possible solutions.

60. What's wrong with this sentence?

About noon the sky darkened, a breeze sprang up, and a low rumble announces the approaching storm.

"sprang up" should be "sprung up."

"rumble" should be "rumbled."

"announces" should be "announced."

Nothing.

The correct answer is "announces" should be "announced." The sentence is describing a past event, so the verb "announced" should be in the past tense to match the tense of the other verbs in the sentence ("sprang up" and "darkened").

Explanation

The correct answer is "announces" should be "announced." The sentence is describing a past event, so the verb "announced" should be in the past tense to match the tense of the other verbs in the sentence ("sprang up" and "darkened").

61. What's wrong with this sentence?

There is no vial excuse to avoid pursing a passionate love affair with the Creator of the world.

"vial" does not make sense.

There should be a comma after "passionate."

"Creator" should not be capitalized.

Nothing.

The word "vial" in the sentence does not make sense. The correct word that should be used is "viable," which means feasible or practical. "Vial" refers to a small container, which does not fit the context of the sentence.

Explanation

The word "vial" in the sentence does not make sense. The correct word that should be used is "viable," which means feasible or practical. "Vial" refers to a small container, which does not fit the context of the sentence.

62. Where does the footnote number go after a paraphrase?

Immediately after the last word before the closing punctuation.

Immediately after the closing punctuation.

Two spaces after the closing punctuation.

You do not have to footnote other people's ideas.

The correct answer is "Immediately after the closing punctuation." When paraphrasing someone else's work, it is important to provide a citation or footnote to acknowledge the original source. The footnote number should be placed immediately after the closing punctuation of the paraphrased sentence. This helps to clearly indicate to the reader that the information is not the author's original idea and provides them with the necessary information to locate the original source if desired.

Explanation

The correct answer is "Immediately after the closing punctuation." When paraphrasing someone else's work, it is important to provide a citation or footnote to acknowledge the original source. The footnote number should be placed immediately after the closing punctuation of the paraphrased sentence. This helps to clearly indicate to the reader that the information is not the author's original idea and provides them with the necessary information to locate the original source if desired.

63. Do all non-original words and/or ideas have to have a footnote and a bibliographical entry?

Footnote, yes. Bibliography, no.

Footnote, no. Bibliography, yes.

Yes, both.

No, neither.

The correct answer is "Yes, both." In academic writing, it is important to give credit to the original sources of non-original words and ideas. Footnotes are used to provide additional information or acknowledge sources within the text, while a bibliography is a list of all the sources consulted or referenced in the work. Including both footnotes and a bibliography ensures that all non-original words and ideas are properly attributed and allows readers to locate and verify the sources.

Explanation

The correct answer is "Yes, both." In academic writing, it is important to give credit to the original sources of non-original words and ideas. Footnotes are used to provide additional information or acknowledge sources within the text, while a bibliography is a list of all the sources consulted or referenced in the work. Including both footnotes and a bibliography ensures that all non-original words and ideas are properly attributed and allows readers to locate and verify the sources.

64. Which of these sentences has the footnote number in the proper place?

A

B

C

A & C.

B & C

Sentence A is the correct answer because it is the only sentence that has the footnote number placed at the end of the sentence. In sentences B and C, the footnote number is either missing or placed in the wrong position. Option A & C and B & C are incorrect because they include sentences that do not have the footnote number in the proper place.

Explanation

Sentence A is the correct answer because it is the only sentence that has the footnote number placed at the end of the sentence. In sentences B and C, the footnote number is either missing or placed in the wrong position. Option A & C and B & C are incorrect because they include sentences that do not have the footnote number in the proper place.

65. Where does the footnote number go after a quote?

Immediately after the last word, before the punctuation and quotation mark.

In between the punctuation and the closing quotation mark.

Two spaces to the right of the closing quotation mark.

Immediately after the closing quotation mark.

You don't have to footnote direct quotes.

The footnote number goes immediately after the closing quotation mark. This is because the purpose of a footnote is to provide additional information or cite a source for the quote, and placing the footnote number immediately after the closing quotation mark makes it clear that the footnote is associated with the quote itself. Placing the footnote number before the punctuation and quotation mark or in between the punctuation and closing quotation mark would create confusion about what the footnote is referencing.

Explanation

The footnote number goes immediately after the closing quotation mark. This is because the purpose of a footnote is to provide additional information or cite a source for the quote, and placing the footnote number immediately after the closing quotation mark makes it clear that the footnote is associated with the quote itself. Placing the footnote number before the punctuation and quotation mark or in between the punctuation and closing quotation mark would create confusion about what the footnote is referencing.

66. What's wrong with this sentence?

Wisdom and discernment are huge when it comes to politics.

Wisdom and discernment are irrelevant to politics.

"huge" is a poor word choice.

Discernment should also be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given correct answer for this question is "huge" is a poor word choice. This is because the word "huge" is too informal and casual for the context of politics. It would be more appropriate to use a more formal and precise word to describe the importance of wisdom and discernment in politics.

Explanation

The given correct answer for this question is "huge" is a poor word choice. This is because the word "huge" is too informal and casual for the context of politics. It would be more appropriate to use a more formal and precise word to describe the importance of wisdom and discernment in politics.

67. What’s wrong with this opening sentence?

One thing I want to discuss is Elvis’ influence on Christian music.

It is missing commas.

It says too much.

It is a weak opening.

Nothing.

The opening sentence is considered weak because it does not grab the reader's attention or create interest. It simply states that the author wants to discuss Elvis' influence on Christian music without providing any compelling or intriguing information. A stronger opening could include a captivating fact, an intriguing question, or a thought-provoking statement to engage the reader from the beginning.

Explanation

The opening sentence is considered weak because it does not grab the reader's attention or create interest. It simply states that the author wants to discuss Elvis' influence on Christian music without providing any compelling or intriguing information. A stronger opening could include a captivating fact, an intriguing question, or a thought-provoking statement to engage the reader from the beginning.

68. What's wrong with this sentence?

The movement of the Holy Spirit is not a force that can be controlled and that is something hard to promote.

"the Holy Spirit is not a force" is awkward.

"is not a force that can be controlled" is awkward.

"and that is something hard to promote." is awkward.

Nothing.

The given correct answer is "and that is something hard to promote." is awkward. This part of the sentence does not flow well with the rest of the sentence. It seems out of place and does not fit smoothly into the overall structure. It could be rephrased or rewritten to improve the clarity and coherence of the sentence.

Explanation

The given correct answer is "and that is something hard to promote." is awkward. This part of the sentence does not flow well with the rest of the sentence. It seems out of place and does not fit smoothly into the overall structure. It could be rephrased or rewritten to improve the clarity and coherence of the sentence.

69. What's wrong with these margins?

The left margin is set too small.

The right margin is set too small.

They are not set to 1 inch.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "They are not set to 1 inch." This is because the question is asking about what is wrong with the margins, and the other options do not address any issues with the margins. The left and right margins being set too small could be a problem, but it is not specifically mentioned in the question. The fact that the margins are not set to 1 inch is the only option that directly addresses a potential issue with the margins.

Explanation

The correct answer is "They are not set to 1 inch." This is because the question is asking about what is wrong with the margins, and the other options do not address any issues with the margins. The left and right margins being set too small could be a problem, but it is not specifically mentioned in the question. The fact that the margins are not set to 1 inch is the only option that directly addresses a potential issue with the margins.

70.

What's wrong with this sentence?

In its purist form, Christendom takes laws and power into its own hands without Christ’s guidance.

Purist is not used correctly.

It is a run-on sentence.

"Its" should be "it's."

Nothing.

The word "purist" is not used correctly in the sentence. The correct term to use would be "purest" to describe the most genuine or unadulterated form of Christendom.

Explanation

The word "purist" is not used correctly in the sentence. The correct term to use would be "purest" to describe the most genuine or unadulterated form of Christendom.

71. What’s wrong with this sentence?

As a Christian or someone who imitates Christ one must keep God's commandments.

It is a run-on sentence.

It is missing commas.

Commandments should be capitalized.

Nothing.

The given sentence "As a Christian or someone who imitates Christ one must keep God's commandments" is missing commas. Commas should be used to separate the different parts of the sentence, specifically before and after the phrase "or someone who imitates Christ". This would make the sentence clearer and easier to understand.

Explanation

The given sentence "As a Christian or someone who imitates Christ one must keep God's commandments" is missing commas. Commas should be used to separate the different parts of the sentence, specifically before and after the phrase "or someone who imitates Christ". This would make the sentence clearer and easier to understand.

72. How should page numbers appear on your paper?

At the bottom, centered by itself, and in 14-point font.

In the top left corner with your first initial and last name.

In the header, right aligned, after your last name, separated by a space.

In the header, right aligned, after your full name.

Page numbers should appear in the header, right aligned, after your last name, separated by a space. This is the standard format for page numbers in academic papers. Placing them in the header ensures that they are consistently visible throughout the document. Right alignment provides a neat and organized appearance. Including the page numbers after the last name helps to identify the author and differentiate the pages from other elements in the header. Separating the page numbers with a space makes them easier to read and locate.

Explanation

Page numbers should appear in the header, right aligned, after your last name, separated by a space. This is the standard format for page numbers in academic papers. Placing them in the header ensures that they are consistently visible throughout the document. Right alignment provides a neat and organized appearance. Including the page numbers after the last name helps to identify the author and differentiate the pages from other elements in the header. Separating the page numbers with a space makes them easier to read and locate.

73. Identify the problems with this sentence.

The driver opens up the hood, then jumped back as steam billows out.

"opens" should be "opened."

"steam" should be "steams."

"billows" should be "billowed."

Nothing.

The sentence is describing a sequence of actions that happened in the past. Therefore, the verb "opens" should be changed to "opened" to maintain consistency in verb tense. Additionally, the verb "billows" should be changed to "billowed" to match the past tense of the sentence.

Explanation

The sentence is describing a sequence of actions that happened in the past. Therefore, the verb "opens" should be changed to "opened" to maintain consistency in verb tense. Additionally, the verb "billows" should be changed to "billowed" to match the past tense of the sentence.

Submit

74. Identify the problems with this sentence.

Therefore a solution to these issues may not be readily reached.

There should be a comma after "Therefore."

"may not" should be "mayn't."

"readily" is a poor word choice.

Nothing.

The given sentence has two problems. Firstly, there should be a comma after "Therefore" to separate it from the rest of the sentence. Secondly, "readily" is a poor word choice as it does not effectively convey the intended meaning.

Explanation

The given sentence has two problems. Firstly, there should be a comma after "Therefore" to separate it from the rest of the sentence. Secondly, "readily" is a poor word choice as it does not effectively convey the intended meaning.

Submit

75. What's wrong with this block quote?

It is indented too far in.

It should not be in quotations.

It should not be single spaced.

Nothing.

The block quote should not be in quotations because block quotes are already visually distinct from the rest of the text, typically appearing as indented paragraphs. Quotation marks are generally used to indicate direct speech or to enclose a short phrase or sentence. Therefore, using quotation marks for a block quote would be redundant and unnecessary.

Explanation

The block quote should not be in quotations because block quotes are already visually distinct from the rest of the text, typically appearing as indented paragraphs. Quotation marks are generally used to indicate direct speech or to enclose a short phrase or sentence. Therefore, using quotation marks for a block quote would be redundant and unnecessary.

76. How should book titles appear in your paper?

In quotation marks.

In bold.

In italics.

All capital letters.

Book titles should appear in italics in a paper. This is a common formatting convention in academic writing. Italicizing book titles helps to distinguish them from the rest of the text and indicates that they are being referenced or cited. Using quotation marks, bold, or all capital letters is not the standard practice for book titles in academic writing.

Explanation

Book titles should appear in italics in a paper. This is a common formatting convention in academic writing. Italicizing book titles helps to distinguish them from the rest of the text and indicates that they are being referenced or cited. Using quotation marks, bold, or all capital letters is not the standard practice for book titles in academic writing.

77. What’s wrong with this sentence?

Though Special Revelation also needs to be interpreted it is much clearer than General Revelation.

There needs to be a comma after "Special Revelation."

There needs to be a semi-colon after "interpreted."

There needs to be a comma after "interpreted."

Nothing.

The given correct answer is "There needs to be a comma after 'interpreted.'" This is because the sentence contains a compound predicate, where two actions are being described: "Special Revelation also needs to be interpreted" and "it is much clearer than General Revelation." In order to separate these two actions, a comma is needed after "interpreted" to indicate a pause in the sentence.

Explanation

The given correct answer is "There needs to be a comma after 'interpreted.'" This is because the sentence contains a compound predicate, where two actions are being described: "Special Revelation also needs to be interpreted" and "it is much clearer than General Revelation." In order to separate these two actions, a comma is needed after "interpreted" to indicate a pause in the sentence.

78. What's wrong with this sentence?

Some churches seem to measure their success by the amount of people that sit in the pews.

"churches" should be capitalized.

"amount" is a poor word choice.

"sit in the pews." is awkward.

Nothing.

The given sentence is discussing how some churches measure their success. The word "amount" is used incorrectly in this context. The word "amount" is typically used when referring to things that cannot be counted, while "number" should be used when referring to countable items. In this case, since people can be counted, the word "number" would be more appropriate. Therefore, "amount" is a poor word choice in this sentence.

Explanation

The given sentence is discussing how some churches measure their success. The word "amount" is used incorrectly in this context. The word "amount" is typically used when referring to things that cannot be counted, while "number" should be used when referring to countable items. In this case, since people can be counted, the word "number" would be more appropriate. Therefore, "amount" is a poor word choice in this sentence.

79. Which source does footnote 23 refer to?

Page 250 of Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown's book.

Page 250 of John Calvin's book.

Page 250 of both books.

Page 250 of a book mentioned before this page.

Page 250 of a book that will be mentioned on the next page.

not-available-via-ai

Explanation

not-available-via-ai

80. What's wrong with this sentence?

Churches need to be cautious of how they approach the lost.

"Churches" should be "Church's."

"cautious" is a poor word choice.

"approach" should be "approached."

Nothing.

The word "cautious" is a poor word choice in this sentence because it suggests that churches should be wary or hesitant in their approach towards the lost, which may not be the intended meaning. A better word choice would be "careful" or "thoughtful" to convey the idea that churches should approach the lost with sensitivity and consideration.

Explanation

The word "cautious" is a poor word choice in this sentence because it suggests that churches should be wary or hesitant in their approach towards the lost, which may not be the intended meaning. A better word choice would be "careful" or "thoughtful" to convey the idea that churches should approach the lost with sensitivity and consideration.

81. What's wrong with this sentence?

Politics is a field of study that has a lot of controversy of whether a Christian should or should not be a part of.

"Politics is a field of study" is awkwardly phrased.

"that has a lot of controversy of whether" is awkwardly phrased.

It is a run-on sentence.

Nothing.

The correct answer is "that has a lot of controversy of whether" is awkwardly phrased. This is because the phrase "a lot of controversy of whether" is not grammatically correct. A more appropriate phrasing would be "that is controversial regarding whether."

Explanation

The correct answer is "that has a lot of controversy of whether" is awkwardly phrased. This is because the phrase "a lot of controversy of whether" is not grammatically correct. A more appropriate phrasing would be "that is controversial regarding whether."

82. What’s wrong with this sentence?

The second possibility introduces new information which would otherwise be beyond man’s ability to gather from nature.

There should not be an apostrophe after "man."

It is a run-on sentence.

There should be a comma after "information."

Nothing.

The given sentence is missing a comma after "information." The comma is necessary to separate the two independent clauses in the sentence. Without the comma, the sentence can be confusing and difficult to understand.

Explanation

The given sentence is missing a comma after "information." The comma is necessary to separate the two independent clauses in the sentence. Without the comma, the sentence can be confusing and difficult to understand.

83. What's wrong with this sentence?

The delegates said that they are planning to visit the White House.

"delegates" should be "delegate's."

There should be a comma after "said."

"are" should be "were."

Nothing.

The correct answer is "are" should be "were." The sentence is referring to an event in the past, so the verb "were" should be used instead of "are."

Explanation

The correct answer is "are" should be "were." The sentence is referring to an event in the past, so the verb "were" should be used instead of "are."

84. Which of the following is NOT a common organizational pattern for essays?

Chronological order

Spatial order

Order of importance

Reverse alphabetical order

While chronological, spatial, and order of importance are widely used organizational structures in essay writing, reverse alphabetical order is not a standard or recognized pattern. Essays typically aim for a logical flow of ideas to enhance clarity and comprehension, and reverse alphabetical order doesn't serve that purpose.

Explanation

While chronological, spatial, and order of importance are widely used organizational structures in essay writing, reverse alphabetical order is not a standard or recognized pattern. Essays typically aim for a logical flow of ideas to enhance clarity and comprehension, and reverse alphabetical order doesn't serve that purpose.

85. Identify the problems with this opening sentence.

I feel like Jane Austen is a really good writer.

"I feel" is unnecessary and a weak opening phrase.

"really" is unnecessary.

It is an unsubstantiated statement of opinion.

Nothing.

The opening sentence has several problems. Firstly, the phrase "I feel" is unnecessary and weakens the sentence. Secondly, the word "really" is unnecessary and adds no value to the statement. Lastly, the sentence is an unsubstantiated statement of opinion, lacking any evidence or supporting arguments.

Explanation

The opening sentence has several problems. Firstly, the phrase "I feel" is unnecessary and weakens the sentence. Secondly, the word "really" is unnecessary and adds no value to the statement. Lastly, the sentence is an unsubstantiated statement of opinion, lacking any evidence or supporting arguments.

Submit

86. When quoting a specific translation of the Bible, how do you indicate the translation?

Matthew 7:9 .

Matthew 7:9. (New International Version).

Matthew 7:9 {NIV}.

Matthew 7:9::NIV.

Matthew 7:9 (NIV).

To indicate the specific translation of the Bible, you would typically include the abbreviation or name of the translation in parentheses after the verse reference. In this case, the correct answer is "Matthew 7:9 (NIV)" which indicates that the verse is from the New International Version translation of the Bible.

Explanation

To indicate the specific translation of the Bible, you would typically include the abbreviation or name of the translation in parentheses after the verse reference. In this case, the correct answer is "Matthew 7:9 (NIV)" which indicates that the verse is from the New International Version translation of the Bible.

87. What's wrong with this sentence?

Workers are installing extra loudspeakers because the music in tonight's concert will need amplification.

"Workers" should be "Worker's"

"tonight's" should be "tonights"

"will need" should be "needed"

Nothing.

The given sentence does not contain any grammatical errors or mistakes in punctuation. It is correctly written and does not require any corrections.

Explanation

The given sentence does not contain any grammatical errors or mistakes in punctuation. It is correctly written and does not require any corrections.

88. Identify the problems with this sentence?

He stresses that we be involved in government, and promoting our values.

"stresses" should be "stressed."

"we be involved" is awkward.

"promoting" is not consistent with the verb tense of the rest of the sentence.

Nothing

The sentence contains multiple problems. Firstly, the word "stresses" should be changed to "stressed" to maintain consistency in verb tense. Secondly, the phrase "we be involved" is awkward and could be improved for clarity and readability. Lastly, the word "promoting" is not consistent with the verb tense of the rest of the sentence, suggesting a mismatch in verb forms.

Explanation

The sentence contains multiple problems. Firstly, the word "stresses" should be changed to "stressed" to maintain consistency in verb tense. Secondly, the phrase "we be involved" is awkward and could be improved for clarity and readability. Lastly, the word "promoting" is not consistent with the verb tense of the rest of the sentence, suggesting a mismatch in verb forms.

Submit

89. Identify the problems with this sentence?

Again Syncretists and Natural Religions solely rely on General Revelation for their information while Christians use Special Revelation to interpret General Revelation.

There should be a comma after "Again."

There should be a comma after "Syncretists."

There should be a comma after "Religions."

There should be a comma after "information."

There should be a comma after "Special Revelation."

The sentence contains a list of items that should be separated by commas. The first problem is that there should be a comma after "Again" to indicate a pause in the sentence. Additionally, there should be commas after "Syncretists," "Religions," and "information" to separate the items in the list. Finally, there should be a comma after "Special Revelation" to indicate a pause before the next part of the sentence.

Explanation

The sentence contains a list of items that should be separated by commas. The first problem is that there should be a comma after "Again" to indicate a pause in the sentence. Additionally, there should be commas after "Syncretists," "Religions," and "information" to separate the items in the list. Finally, there should be a comma after "Special Revelation" to indicate a pause before the next part of the sentence.

Submit

90. What's wrong with this footnote?

The author's name should be "Kimball, Dan."

There should not be parentheses in the footnote.

The first line is not indented.

Nothing.

The correct answer is that the first line is not indented. This means that the first line of the footnote is not aligned with the subsequent lines, which is a common formatting requirement for footnotes. Indenting the first line helps to visually distinguish it from the main text and makes it easier for readers to identify and locate the footnote.

Explanation

The correct answer is that the first line is not indented. This means that the first line of the footnote is not aligned with the subsequent lines, which is a common formatting requirement for footnotes. Indenting the first line helps to visually distinguish it from the main text and makes it easier for readers to identify and locate the footnote.

91. That book peaked/peeked/piqued my interest in English Composition.

Peaked

Peeked

Piqued

A and B

The correct answer is "piqued." In this context, "piqued" means to stimulate or arouse one's interest. The phrase "piqued my interest" is a common idiom used to express that something has caught someone's attention or curiosity. Therefore, the correct word choice in the given sentence is "piqued."

Explanation

The correct answer is "piqued." In this context, "piqued" means to stimulate or arouse one's interest. The phrase "piqued my interest" is a common idiom used to express that something has caught someone's attention or curiosity. Therefore, the correct word choice in the given sentence is "piqued."

92. Identify the problems in this sentence.

Christians should know what they believe about these issues, but a person who does not believe in God should have little reason to listen to us when we say that God gave us these morals.

"Christians" should be "Christian's"

There should be a comma after "person."

The sentence is awkward and doesn't make sense.

"should have little reason" is a poor word choice.

It is a run-on sentence.

The given correct answer is that the sentence is awkward and doesn't make sense, "should have little reason" is a poor word choice, and it is a run-on sentence. The explanation for this is that the sentence lacks clarity and coherence. The phrase "should have little reason" is not the most appropriate choice of words to convey the intended meaning. Additionally, the sentence is long and lacks proper punctuation, making it a run-on sentence. Overall, these issues contribute to the sentence being awkward and difficult to understand.

Explanation

The given correct answer is that the sentence is awkward and doesn't make sense, "should have little reason" is a poor word choice, and it is a run-on sentence. The explanation for this is that the sentence lacks clarity and coherence. The phrase "should have little reason" is not the most appropriate choice of words to convey the intended meaning. Additionally, the sentence is long and lacks proper punctuation, making it a run-on sentence. Overall, these issues contribute to the sentence being awkward and difficult to understand.

Submit

93. Identify the problems with this cover page.

The cover page shouldn't have a page number and the first initial doesn't belong in the header.

The font is inappropriate for college writing.

There is information missing and the layout is wrong.

The date isn't formatted properly.

Nothing.

The given answer correctly identifies the problems with the cover page. It mentions that the cover page should not have a page number and the first initial does not belong in the header. It also points out that the font used is not suitable for college writing. Additionally, it states that there is missing information and the layout is incorrect. Lastly, it highlights that the date is not formatted properly.

Explanation

The given answer correctly identifies the problems with the cover page. It mentions that the cover page should not have a page number and the first initial does not belong in the header. It also points out that the font used is not suitable for college writing. Additionally, it states that there is missing information and the layout is incorrect. Lastly, it highlights that the date is not formatted properly.

Submit

94. Identify the problems with this sentence.

This world has reared its ugly head to reveal a culture that disputes all Christian morals while the knowledge of these morals is known.

"culture" is a poor word choice.

"disputes" is a poor word choice.

"while the knowledge of these morals is known" is awkward.

Nothing.

The sentence contains two problems. Firstly, "culture" is a poor word choice because it implies that the entire society disputes Christian morals, which may not be true. Secondly, "disputes" is a poor word choice as it suggests an active disagreement, whereas "challenges" or "questions" may be more appropriate. Additionally, the phrase "while the knowledge of these morals is known" is awkward and redundant, as it is unnecessary to state that knowledge is known.

Explanation

The sentence contains two problems. Firstly, "culture" is a poor word choice because it implies that the entire society disputes Christian morals, which may not be true. Secondly, "disputes" is a poor word choice as it suggests an active disagreement, whereas "challenges" or "questions" may be more appropriate. Additionally, the phrase "while the knowledge of these morals is known" is awkward and redundant, as it is unnecessary to state that knowledge is known.

Submit

95. Identify the problems with this sentence?

Using the word Christian as a label has a negative connotation in the present today and is not helpful to any Christian.

Christian should be in quotations.

"is not helpful to any Christian" is unnecessary.

"present today" is redundant.

Nothing.

The problems with this sentence are that "Christian" should be in quotations, "is not helpful to any Christian" is unnecessary, and "present today" is redundant.

Explanation

The problems with this sentence are that "Christian" should be in quotations, "is not helpful to any Christian" is unnecessary, and "present today" is redundant.

Submit

96. Identify the problems with this sentence.

God’s initial intent was to keep the earth completely blameless and uncondemned, but through the fall his plan was tainted bringing death and destruction to the world.

"to keep the earth" is awkward.

"completely blameless and uncondemned," are poor word choices.

There needs to be a comma after "fall."

Nothing.

The sentence contains problems with word choice and punctuation. The phrase "completely blameless and uncondemned" is not the most effective way to convey the intended meaning. Additionally, a comma is needed after the word "fall" to separate the two clauses in the sentence.

Explanation

The sentence contains problems with word choice and punctuation. The phrase "completely blameless and uncondemned" is not the most effective way to convey the intended meaning. Additionally, a comma is needed after the word "fall" to separate the two clauses in the sentence.

Submit

97. Identify the problems with this opening sentence.

There are so many problems in the American church today, which is inevitable due to the fact that the imperfect human race has been called to follow a perfect and holy being.

It is a run-on sentence.

It is logically fallacious.

Nothing.

The opening sentence is a run-on sentence because it contains multiple independent clauses that are not properly separated. It is also logically fallacious because it assumes that the problems in the American church are inevitable due to the imperfect nature of humans following a perfect and holy being. However, the call to follow a perfect and holy being does not necessarily have anything to do with the problems in the American church.

Explanation

The opening sentence is a run-on sentence because it contains multiple independent clauses that are not properly separated. It is also logically fallacious because it assumes that the problems in the American church are inevitable due to the imperfect nature of humans following a perfect and holy being. However, the call to follow a perfect and holy being does not necessarily have anything to do with the problems in the American church.

Submit

98. Identify the problems with this bibliographical entry?

The last name should be first.

The first line should be indented.

The second line should be indented.

Nothing.

The problems with this bibliographical entry are that the last name should be listed first and the second line should be indented.

Explanation

The problems with this bibliographical entry are that the last name should be listed first and the second line should be indented.

Submit

99. Identify the poor word choices in this sentence.

Our Constitution was made long ago to try and keep this nation of ours a Christian nation.

"was made"

"try and keep"

"keep this nation"

Nothing.

The poor word choices in this sentence are "was made" and "try and keep". Instead of "was made", the word choice should be "was written" or "was drafted" to accurately describe the creation of the Constitution. Additionally, "try and keep" should be replaced with "to maintain" or "to preserve" to convey the intention of the Constitution in a more precise and effective manner.

Explanation

The poor word choices in this sentence are "was made" and "try and keep". Instead of "was made", the word choice should be "was written" or "was drafted" to accurately describe the creation of the Constitution. Additionally, "try and keep" should be replaced with "to maintain" or "to preserve" to convey the intention of the Constitution in a more precise and effective manner.

Submit

100. What’s wrong with this sentence?

That does not mean all of our information is wrong, but that there are only a few things we can know for certain.

"all of our information" is awkwardly phrased.

"there are only a few things" is awkwardly phrased.

"we can know for certain" is awkwardly phrased.

Nothing.

The given sentence is grammatically correct and does not contain any errors or awkward phrasing. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.

Explanation

The given sentence is grammatically correct and does not contain any errors or awkward phrasing. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with this sentence.