Criminal Procedure Quiz 2

Reviewed by Editorial Team
The ProProfs editorial team is comprised of experienced subject matter experts. They've collectively created over 10,000 quizzes and lessons, serving over 100 million users. Our team includes in-house content moderators and subject matter experts, as well as a global network of rigorously trained contributors. All adhere to our comprehensive editorial guidelines, ensuring the delivery of high-quality content.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Bmcree
B
Bmcree
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 3 | Total Attempts: 8,005
| Attempts: 1,183
SettingsSettings
Please wait...
  • 1/8 Questions

    A frisk is a pat-down of the outer clothing to find

    • Controlled substances
    • Evidence of any type of crime
    • Identification materials
    • Weapons
Please wait...
About This Quiz

Criminal Procedure Quiz 2 assesses knowledge on lawful police conduct during stops, frisks, and interrogations. It evaluates understanding of legal standards like justification for searches and the nuances of citizen-police encounters, crucial for legal and law enforcement professionals.

Criminal Procedure Quiz 2 - Quiz

Quiz Preview

  • 2. 

    An officer makes a valid stop for a non-violent offense.   Therefore the officer is automatically justified to conduct a frisk search.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. False
    Explanation
    Officers who do not have ARS to beleive that the suspect has a weapon does not have the right to conduct a frisk. Terry v. Ohio

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    An officer receives an anonymous tip that a suspect is selling drugs on the street.  This is the only information the officer has.  The best course of action for the officer would be to immediately

    • Locate and frisk the suspect

    • Attempt to obtain a warrant

    • Locate and arrest the suspect

    • Attempt to corroborate the tip

    Correct Answer
    A. Attempt to corroborate the tip
    Explanation
    Anonymous tips alone do not provide probable cause or ARS to stop. They must be corroborated to the level of ARS.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    A police officer approaches a suspect in a public place and asks if he or she is willing to answer some questions.  This action by the officer

    • Is not a seizure

    • Is the equivalent of a stop

    • Is the equivalent of an arrest

    • Must be justified by a warrant

    Correct Answer
    A. Is not a seizure
    Explanation
    Tier 1(brief stop) no seizure occured suspect has every right to leave.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Which of the following standards of proof is not required in any legal proceeding?

    • Preponderance of the evidence

    • Clear and convincing evidence

    • Absolute certainty

    • Proof beyond a reasonable doubt

    Correct Answer
    A. Absolute certainty
    Explanation
    Jurys are not required to find somone guilty to an "absolute certainty". They do not have to be 100% sure. Just beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    Which of the following can an officer use to establish probable cause.

    • Trustworthy information

    • Hearsay information

    • Prior criminal record

    • All of the above

    Correct Answer
    A. All of the above
    Explanation
    An officer can use trustworthy information, hearsay information, and a prior criminal record to establish probable cause. Trustworthy information refers to reliable and credible sources that provide factual details or evidence. Hearsay information, although less reliable, can still contribute to establishing probable cause if it comes from a reliable source. A prior criminal record can also be used as a basis for probable cause if it indicates a history of criminal behavior. Therefore, all of the above options can be utilized by an officer to establish probable cause.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    An officer has made a valid stop of an automobile.  To order the driver to exit the vehicle, the officer needs no justification.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    In this scenario, the correct answer is True. When an officer has made a valid stop of an automobile, they have the authority to order the driver to exit the vehicle without needing any additional justification. This is because the officer's primary concern is ensuring their safety and the safety of others during the stop. By asking the driver to exit the vehicle, the officer can better assess the situation and minimize potential risks.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    Exigent circumstances is not an exception to the exclusionary rule.

    • True

    • False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    Exigent circumstances refers to situations where law enforcement officers are faced with an urgent need to act without obtaining a warrant, typically to prevent the destruction of evidence or to protect the safety of individuals. The exclusionary rule, on the other hand, states that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in court. In this context, the correct answer is true because exigent circumstances do not provide an exception to the exclusionary rule. This means that even if law enforcement officers have a legitimate reason to act without a warrant due to exigent circumstances, any evidence obtained during that search may still be excluded from court proceedings.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 20, 2023 +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 20, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Aug 04, 2010
    Quiz Created by
    Bmcree
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.