Study the topics CPU II: Assembly Languages and Language Translators before trying this test.
Assembly programs are simpler to translate and occupy less storage space.
Assembly languages are easier to code in.
Assembly language programs are portable.
Assembly is simpler to translate and easier to code in.
Rate this question:
It uses symbolic addressing.
It is very English-like.
It is a machine-oriented language that requires a good knowledge of machine architecture to code in.
All of the above
Rate this question:
LDA is the opcode and X is the operand
LDA is the operand and X is the opcode
LDA is a symbolic address
X is a direct address
Rate this question:
Assembly language is a High Level Language.
Each assembly code instruction is equivalent to 1 machine code instruction.
Machine code is a HLL
Assembly language makes use of mnemonics
Rate this question:
Compilers only.
Compilers, Interpreters and Assemblers.
Compilers and Interpreters.
Compilers and Assemblers.
Rate this question:
Are not portable
Make use of mnemonics
Run faster and require less storage space than those written in HLLs
All of the above
Rate this question:
An interpreter can produce object code that may be saved and run straight away.
An interpreter would have to translate it each time it is run
It is best to use an assembler.
An interpreter would translate it once and then produce object code that can be saved and afterwards run directly (without needing further translation)
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.