8.1.2 Quiz Persuasion Inductive Verses Deductive

The last part of this inductive reasoning example is "Dogs and Cats both have fur." This statement is the general observation that can be inferred from the specific examples given. The specific examples of Ms. Shin's dog and Ms. McEwen's cat having fur lead to the general observation that dogs and cats, in general, have fur.

The conclusion that can be made from the given propositions is that Jasmine lives in Chicago. The first proposition states that all VOISE students live in Chicago, and the second proposition states that Jasmine is a VOISE student. Therefore, based on these two propositions, it can be concluded that Jasmine lives in Chicago.

The correct answer is "Ms. McEwen's a cat, Bradshaw, is a mammal." This is the last part of the deductive reasoning example because it follows the general observation that cats and dogs are mammals. The specific example of Ms. Shin's dog, Bella, being a mammal reinforces this general observation. Therefore, it can be concluded that Ms. McEwen's cat, Bradshaw, is also a mammal.

Inductive reasoning is a type of argument where the writer provides specific examples to support a particular point. This method involves moving from specific observations to a general conclusion. By presenting specific instances or evidence, the writer aims to establish a pattern or trend that supports their point of view. Inductive reasoning is often used to make generalizations or draw conclusions based on observed patterns, making it a valuable tool in persuasive writing or logical reasoning.

Deductive and inductive are the two types of logic. Deductive logic involves reasoning from general principles to specific conclusions, using syllogisms and formal rules. It is based on the idea that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Inductive logic, on the other hand, involves reasoning from specific observations or examples to general conclusions. It is based on the idea that if the premises are true, then the conclusion is likely to be true, but not necessarily certain.

Deductive reasoning is a type of argument where the speaker starts with a general observation and then provides specific examples to support their point. This type of reasoning involves moving from a broad statement to more specific evidence, ultimately aiming to prove their point.

Pathos refers to the persuasive technique of appealing to the emotions of the audience. It involves using emotional language, vivid imagery, and personal anecdotes to evoke feelings such as sympathy, empathy, or anger. By appealing to the emotions, the speaker or writer aims to create a connection with the audience and elicit a desired response or action. This technique is commonly used in advertising, speeches, and persuasive writing to sway the audience's opinions or beliefs.

Syllogisms consist of two propositions, known as premises, and a conclusion. The premises are statements that provide evidence or support for the conclusion, which is the logical inference drawn from the premises. In this case, the correct answer is "proposition, proposition, conclusion" because it accurately describes the three parts that make up syllogisms.

Rhetoric refers to the use of language and communication techniques to persuade or convince an audience of a particular viewpoint. It involves the skillful use of language, style, and persuasive strategies to make a compelling argument. Rhetoric is not limited to emotions, logic, or knowledge alone, but encompasses the overall persuasive approach used in an argument. Therefore, the correct answer is "An argument made to convince your audience of a specific point of view."

Syllogisms are a form of deductive reasoning. In deductive reasoning, conclusions are drawn from premises based on logical rules and principles. Syllogisms consist of two premises and a conclusion, where the conclusion is derived from the premises using deductive logic. Therefore, syllogisms are a specific type of deductive reasoning.