5th Grade USA Studies 1565 To The Present: Week 17

The correct answer is J. The North had a greater number of representatives in Congress. This is likely because the North had a larger population than the South during the time period being referred to. In the United States, the number of representatives in Congress is based on each state's population, with larger states having more representatives. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the North, with its larger population, would have had a greater number of representatives in Congress compared to the South.

The best alternative title for the subsection called "The Compromise of 1850" would be "Both Sides Give and Both Sides Take." This title accurately reflects the nature of the compromise, which involved concessions from both the North and the South in order to maintain a delicate balance between free and slave states. The compromise included provisions such as the admission of California as a free state and the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Act, demonstrating that both sides had to make compromises in order to reach a resolution.

A state might choose to nullify a law because the people disagree with the decisions made by the federal government. This suggests that the state's population does not support or agree with the law imposed by the federal government, leading them to nullify it as a form of protest or resistance. This action reflects the state's desire to exercise its own autonomy and assert its disagreement with the federal government's decisions.

This week's issue provides information that supports the statement that the Missouri Compromise settled a problem by making both sides give and take a little. The Missouri Compromise was an agreement between the North and the South to maintain a balance between free and slave states. It allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state while also admitting Maine as a free state. Additionally, it established a boundary line (36°30' parallel) where slavery would be prohibited in future states. This compromise demonstrates a compromise and a willingness for both sides to make concessions.

The most likely reason the first Kansas election was considered unfair is that more people voted than were registered to vote in the state. This suggests that there may have been instances of voter fraud or irregularities, which undermines the integrity of the election process and makes it unfair.

not-available-via-ai

not-available-via-ai

The most likely reason Northerners were upset that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote whether or not they wanted to be a slave state is because all states north of the Missouri Compromise line were supposed to remain free states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 established a line across the country, with states to the north being free and states to the south being slave states. The idea was that any new states admitted to the Union above this line would also be free states. Allowing Kansas and Nebraska to vote on their status as slave or free states was seen as a violation of this compromise and a potential threat to the balance of power between free and slave states.

The correct answer, option D, accurately summarizes the information in the article. It states that Northern abolitionists wanted to abolish slavery and organized a system to help slaves escape. It also mentions that many slaves used the Underground Railroad to reach freedom, even as far away as Canada. This answer captures the main points of the article and provides a concise summary of the information presented.

Most Southerners did not vote for Abraham Lincoln in the election of 1860 because they were likely afraid that his anti-slavery views would lead to the abolition of slavery in the South. Slavery was deeply ingrained in the Southern economy and culture, and many Southerners believed that Lincoln's election would threaten their way of life. They did not trust him to protect their interests and feared the potential consequences of his presidency on the institution of slavery.