Tryout Online Spmb Pkn Stan 2020 - Tbi

The correct answer is "d. If". This is because the sentence is conditional, stating that if two waves pass a given point simultaneously, then they will have no effect on each other's subsequent motion. The word "if" introduces the condition and is necessary for the sentence to make sense.

The passage does not mention anything about lobsters being able to see better than smell.

The writer's purpose in writing the passage is to introduce the nature of lobsters. This can be inferred from the information provided in the passage, which likely includes details about the characteristics, behavior, or habitat of lobsters.

The correct answer is C. "That State University would win." This is the correct answer because it correctly uses the subjunctive mood to express a hoped-for outcome in the past. The phrase "that State University would win" indicates a desired outcome that did not actually happen, as indicated by the phrase "but the other team played very well." The use of "would" in this context is necessary to convey the hypothetical or desired nature of the outcome.

The correct answer is B, "They were widely consumed." This can be inferred from the fact that the question is asking about American and European clawed lobsters, suggesting that they were popular and commonly eaten in those regions.

The correct answer is "d. Neither do I." This answer is correct because it correctly uses the negative form "neither do I" to agree with the statement that most foreign students don't like American coffee. The other options (a, b, and c) are incorrect because they use incorrect grammar or do not properly agree with the statement.

Public accountants take such courses in order to increase both their knowledge and their professional standing. This means that by taking these courses, accountants can enhance their expertise in their field and also improve their professional reputation and credibility. This can lead to better job opportunities, higher salaries, and increased trust from clients and employers.

not-available-via-ai

not-available-via-ai

The correct answer is A. The explanation for this is that the phrase "capable of" is the correct preposition to use when talking about someone's ability to do something. In this case, the tiny brain is capable of solving both simple and complex number problems. The other options, "capable to solve," "capable in solving," and "capable with solution," are grammatically incorrect and do not convey the same meaning as the correct answer.

After the lobster larvae are released into the water, they live in self-dug burrows.

The correct answer is A because it is the only option that correctly uses the phrase "he'd rather not." The other options either use incorrect verb forms ("won't rather" and "he'll rather not") or incorrect verb tense ("he'd rather didn't").

not-available-via-ai

The correct answer is "Isn't it." This is because the sentence is in the present perfect tense, which is used to talk about an action that started in the past and is still relevant in the present. The phrase "isn't it" is used to seek confirmation or agreement, and in this case, it is asking for confirmation that it is the first time the princess of Wales has been to the United States.

The passage suggests that the expert insight involves a selection process. This implies that experts have a specific method or criteria for choosing the information they use and the decisions they make. The passage does not mention anything about general knowledge, monitoring progress, or a combination of impulse and reflection, so options B, C, and D can be ruled out.

not-available-via-ai

The correct answer is D. "Had gone". This is because the sentence is referring to a past unrealized action. The speaker is expressing a regret about not going to Jakarta yesterday due to their friend being late. "Had gone" is the correct past perfect tense form to indicate that the action of going to Jakarta did not happen in the past.

The passage discusses various aspects related to brain twisters, such as the use of different talents by experts and non-experts, the factors affecting success with brain twisters, and the role of both impulsive and reflective thinking in solving them. However, there is no mention of the researchers being frustrated by brain twisters. Therefore, option D may not be inferred from the passage.

Thomas Selfridge was the first person to be killed in an airplane accident. Therefore, he must have been a part of the army team that was evaluating the Wright Brothers plane. Option D states that he was a part of an army team evaluating the Wright Brothers plane, which aligns with the given information.

The passage discusses the doubt surrounding whether brain twisters are tests of intelligence. This is evident from the phrase "Are brain twisters tests of intelligence? Doubt lingers." Therefore, the best title for this passage would be "Are brain twisters tests of intelligence? Doubt lingers."