10 Best Mercer Mettl Alternatives & Competitors in 2026

You don’t need hundreds of features to run a good assessment. What matters is being able to create tests, share them with participants, and understand the results without overcomplicating the process.

The answer depends on your needs. A university conducting online exams, a business evaluating job candidates, and a training provider issuing certifications all have different requirements.

Mercer Mettl supports these activities with tools for online testing, hiring, certifications, and exam monitoring. However, its extensive capabilities may be more than some users need, especially when they simply want to create tests, manage participants, and review results.

In this guide, I’ll compare 10 Mercer Mettl alternatives for 2026, covering their features, pros, cons, and pricing to help you find the right fit.

Top 10 Mercer Mettl Alternatives Compared

These 10 tools serve different assessment needs. The table highlights what each specializes in and how its pricing works.

1. ProProfs Quiz Maker: Best for Creating Quizzes & Assessments for Business, Training, and Education

ProProfs Quiz Maker gives businesses, recruiters, and training teams a straightforward way to create assessments, evaluate participants, and track results without complicated test management.

Suppose you’re hiring customer support representatives. You could build a test covering product knowledge, communication, and problem-solving using ready-made questions or the AI quiz generator. The AI can create an assessment from a topic or uploaded document, while the question library helps you find existing content for different skills.

There are 20+ question types, including multiple-choice, matching, essays, drag-and-drop, and audio or video responses. This gives you the flexibility to test practical knowledge, written communication, and other abilities.

You can also set timers, shuffle questions, restrict access, and use available monitoring features when conducting more secure tests. Automatic grading handles scoring, and detailed reports show how participants answered and where they need improvement.

ProProfs Quiz Maker is useful for different testing needs, from hiring and employee training to certifications and online exams. You can reuse questions, adapt existing assessments, and maintain performance records without creating an entirely new testing process for each purpose.

Pros:

• Create complete assessments from a topic, an uploaded document, or existing training material using AI, rather than writing every question manually.
• Access over one million ready-to-use questions and 20+ question types to evaluate different skills and knowledge areas.
• Automatically score supported questions, generate feedback, and issue certificates when participants meet the required criteria.
• Add time limits, randomized questions, controlled access, and available anti-cheating settings to protect online assessments.
• Review individual and group performance, identify knowledge gaps, and export results for hiring or training records.

Cons:

• No dark mode
• Cloud-only, with no on-premises version

User Rating: 4.3/5

Pricing: Free for short quizzes and essential features. Paid plans start at $19.99/month and scale up to $199.99/month on the Enterprise plan for larger teams.

2. TestGorilla – Best for Library-Based Pre-Employment Screening

TestGorilla helps recruitment teams find applicants with the abilities required for a job, rather than relying solely on resumes and interview impressions.

Its test library covers areas such as communication, language, reasoning, personality, software knowledge, and technical skills. Recruiters can select several tests and combine them into one assessment for a particular position.

For instance, when hiring an office administrator, you could assess spreadsheet knowledge, attention to detail, and problem-solving together. Candidates complete the assessment online, and the hiring team receives results that make comparisons easier.

TestGorilla works well for recruitment teams that hire for different roles and prefer using ready-made tests rather than creating everything from scratch.

Pros:

• Select from hundreds of ready-made skills tests covering business, technical, language, and problem-solving abilities.
• Combine multiple tests into a single assessment to check whether applicants meet different job requirements.
• Use structured video questions and available AI interviews to collect more information before scheduling live discussions.
• Compare candidate results in one place to identify applicants who meet the skills required for an opening.
• Connect supported recruitment systems to keep assessment results alongside the hiring process.

Cons:

• Paid plans require an annual commitment
• Fewer advanced exam monitoring features
• Connections with recruitment software require higher-priced plans

User Rating: 4.5/5

Pricing: Free plan available. Paid plans are annual; confirm current rates on the live pricing page.

3. HackerRank – Best for Coding Screens and Live Technical Interviews

HackerRank focuses on a question that matters to engineering managers: Can this developer write working code and explain how they solved a problem?

The platform provides programming challenges across different languages, technical concepts, and difficulty levels. Employers can use these exercises to evaluate applicants before inviting them for a full technical interview.

Candidates write and run code in an online environment. HackerRank evaluates submissions, helping hiring managers review technical performance without having to check every solution manually.

In later hiring stages, live coding interviews allow interviewers to observe how candidates solve problems, test their work, and respond to questions. The platform also offers AI-supported interviewing and assessment features.

Compared with Mercer Mettl’s wider testing capabilities, HackerRank offers a more focused environment for developer recruitment. It is especially relevant to businesses that hire programmers regularly and need coding tests as a central part of their selection process.

Pros:

• Assess programming ability through coding challenges covering multiple languages and technical topics.
• Let candidates write, run, and test their solutions in an online coding environment.
• Automatically evaluate code submissions to reduce the time engineering teams spend reviewing initial screening tests.
• Conduct live technical interviews where interviewers can observe how applicants approach programming problems.
• Use available plagiarism checks and assessment monitoring controls to help protect the reliability of technical results.

Cons:

• No employer free plan
• Limited value outside technical hiring
• Limits on test attempts, with extra charges for additional usage

User Rating: 4.5/5

Pricing: Starter and Pro are self-serve; Enterprise is quote-based. Confirm current self-serve pricing before budgeting.

4. Codility – Best for Structured Coding Assessment With Published Entry Pricing

Codility helps companies understand how software engineers approach real development work.

Instead of assessing candidates only through general technical questions, Codility offers programming tasks that require applicants to apply their knowledge. These can involve writing code, solving software problems, working with databases, or demonstrating familiarity with AI-related development tasks.

Hiring managers can select assessments based on the responsibilities of a position. For example, a backend developer might complete tasks involving database queries and programming logic, while another candidate could be evaluated on a different set of engineering skills.

Codility also lets interviewers and candidates work on code together during live interviews. Hiring managers can ask questions, review the solutions, and compare candidates using the same scoring rules.

Its reporting and test security features help teams document performance and identify suspicious submissions.

For engineering departments comparing Mercer Mettl alternatives, Codility offers an assessment process built specifically around practical technical work.

Pros:

• Evaluate candidates using programming tasks that reflect skills required in real software development roles.
• Prepare assessments for various engineering positions that cover coding, databases, and technical concepts.
• Conduct live coding interviews in a shared workspace where interviewers can follow candidates’ solutions.
• Review consistent performance reports to compare applicants against the same technical requirements.
• Apply available plagiarism detection, identity checks, and assessment monitoring to strengthen test security.

Cons:

• One user on Starter
• No permanent free plan
• Advanced controls require higher plans

User Rating: 4.6/5

Pricing: Starter is $1,200 per year for 120 invites. Larger plans cost more.

5. Adaface – Best for Short, Candidate-Friendly Skills Tests

Adaface is built around testing the knowledge candidates will actually use in their jobs.

Its assessment library covers programming, data analysis, finance, accounting, Excel, reasoning, language skills, and other professional abilities. Employers can choose an existing test or request a customized assessment for a particular role.

Rather than treating every applicant the same, Adaface allows recruitment teams to select questions that reflect the work involved in the role. For example, a finance candidate might be tested on spreadsheet calculations and accounting concepts, while an IT applicant could receive questions relevant to the technologies they would use.

The platform presents questions in a conversational format and provides reports that help hiring managers understand candidate performance. Assessment security features are also available to help identify potentially dishonest behavior.

Adaface is worth considering as a Mercer Mettl alternative when recruitment teams want shorter, job-related screening experiences that focus on the skills required for an open position.

Pros:

• Choose from a library of tests covering programming, finance, reasoning, language, and other professional skills.
• Request assessments that reflect the tasks and knowledge required for specific job openings.
• Present questions in a conversational testing format that makes the screening experience easier to follow.
• Review candidate scores and skill-level results to understand how applicants performed in relevant areas.
• Use available anti-cheating and candidate verification features to support more reliable online screening.

Cons:

• No live video interviews
• No take-home assignment support
• Pricing should be rechecked against the live page

User Rating: 4.6/5

Pricing: Published annual plans start around $180 per year, with higher tiers for larger teams.

6. iMocha – Best for a Broad Enterprise Skills Platform

Hiring the right people is important, but understanding the abilities of existing employees matters just as much. iMocha helps larger organizations build a clearer picture of the skills available across their workforce.

The platform brings together employee skill information, assessment results, and work-related data. HR and business leaders can use these details to understand which capabilities their teams already have and where further development may be needed.

For example, a technology company planning to introduce new AI tools could use employee skill information to identify people who are ready for new responsibilities and those who may benefit from training.

iMocha also helps businesses plan future hiring needs and identify employees who may be ready for new roles.

As a Mercer Mettl alternative, iMocha helps businesses understand employee skills beyond individual test scores. It is particularly relevant to enterprises that want to understand employee capabilities over time and make better decisions about training, job assignments, and internal growth.

Pros:

• Bring employee skill information together to create a clearer picture of workforce strengths and capabilities.
• Identify areas where teams may need additional training before taking on new responsibilities.
• Use validated skill information to support internal job changes and employee development planning.
• Compare workforce abilities with business requirements to identify skills the organization may need in the future.
• Provide HR and business leaders with useful information to plan employee growth and workforce decisions.

Cons:

• Quote-only pricing
• Enterprise-oriented setup
• Less attractive for small teams

User Rating: 4.4/5

Pricing: Custom quote.

7. Equip – Best for Budget Campus and High-Volume Hiring

Recruitment involves more than asking candidates to complete a test. Applications need to be collected, resumes reviewed, interviews scheduled, and decisions recorded. Equip brings these activities into one workflow.

Its built-in hiring system allows recruiters to post openings, manage candidate details, and track progress from application to selection.

Skills testing is included in that process. Recruiters can create assessments for coding, communication, reasoning, typing, and other job-related abilities. The platform also supports AI interviews that collect and evaluate candidate responses.

Consider a growing business hiring employees for several departments. Instead of keeping resumes in one system and test scores in another, the hiring team can review applications, invite candidates to assessments, and manage interviews all in one place.

Pros:

• Manage job applications, candidate details, and recruitment stages in one connected hiring system.
• Create skills tests using ready-made questions or add your own content for specific positions.
• Evaluate coding, reasoning, communication, and other abilities before inviting applicants for interviews.
• Use AI-supported interviews to collect recorded or conversational responses and receive structured feedback.
• Schedule live interviews and compare hiring-team evaluations without moving information between separate tools.

Cons:

• Smaller independent review footprint
• Less proven for high-stakes exam use
• Enterprise integrations are not as mature as larger vendors

User Rating: 4.8/5

Pricing: From $30/month, with per-candidate usage and trial credits.

8. Testportal – Best for Affordable Secure Exams for Small Teams

Testportal is useful when an organization already knows what it wants to test and needs an efficient way to turn that knowledge into an online assessment.

You can create your own questions, generate new ones with AI, or prepare assessments using existing Word or PDF documents.

This approach works well for businesses testing company-specific information. Testportal handles scoring for supported questions and provides reports showing answers, scores, and completion details. It also offers options for monitoring assessments and reducing cheating.

The platform can serve recruitment, employee development, certification, and other testing activities.

Its appeal as a Mercer Mettl alternative comes from a focused approach to test creation and delivery. Teams can build assessments around their own content and review results without adopting an extensive recruitment or workforce management system.

Pros:

• Build assessments using your own questions to evaluate knowledge specific to your organization or training program.
• Generate questions with AI or use material from existing documents to reduce preparation time.
• Automatically grade supported responses and make assessment results available for review.
• Examine individual answers and question-level statistics to understand which topics participants found difficult.
• Apply available monitoring and test security features when administering assessments remotely.

Cons:

• Monthly result caps
• Small review base
• Limited fit for high-volume hiring

User Rating: 4.7/5

Pricing: Free version available. Paid plans start around $35/month.

9. Honorlock – Best for University and Certification Proctoring

Honorlock approaches online assessment from a different direction. Its main purpose is to help organizations confirm that tests and exams are completed under appropriate conditions.

The platform combines automated monitoring with support from human exam supervisors. During an assessment, it can identify activities that may require attention, such as unexpected behavior or attempts to use unauthorized resources.

Honorlock also provides identity verification and features designed to protect the testing environment.

For example, a professional certification provider might already have an exam system but need stronger controls to verify participants and monitor testing sessions. Honorlock can help support that requirement without the organization needing to build its own monitoring process.

The service supports educational institutions and businesses conducting important assessments.

Honorlock focuses on making online exams more secure and helping organizations detect possible cheating. It is therefore a relevant Mercer Mettl alternative for organizations whose main concern is reliable online supervision rather than creating a large library of skills tests.

Pros:

• Monitor online examinations using automated technology that helps identify potentially suspicious activity.
• Provide access to human exam supervisors who can step in when a testing session needs attention.
• Verify the participant’s identity to help ensure the person taking an assessment is the intended candidate.
• Use supported browser and device security measures to discourage unauthorized assistance during exams.
• Review monitoring information and recorded events to investigate potential violations of assessment rules.

Cons:

• Requires a browser extension
• Pricing is not public
• Does not provide an assessment library

User Rating: 4.5/5

Pricing: Custom quote. Institutional pricing examples vary by exam and course.

10. Criteria Corp – Best for Validated Cognitive and Personality Testing

Criteria Corp helps employers understand more about applicants than what appears on a resume.

Its assessments measure areas such as thinking ability, personality, emotional intelligence, and job-related skills. These results can give hiring teams additional information when deciding whether someone is suited to a position.

For instance, a business hiring a team leader may want to understand how applicants approach problems and work with others. A company recruiting for detail-oriented work might prioritize different abilities.

Criteria Corp combines these assessments with structured interviewing tools, enabling organizations to collect information consistently across candidates. The platform also offers employee development capabilities that help businesses support employees after they are hired.

Criteria Corp helps employers understand how candidates think, solve problems, and may behave at work. It suits organizations that want a broader picture of how applicants may perform, rather than relying only on knowledge tests.

Pros:

• Assess thinking ability, personality, emotional intelligence, and other characteristics relevant to different jobs.
• Use established assessment methods to collect information beyond resumes and interview impressions.
• Conduct structured video interviews to evaluate candidates against consistent questions and criteria.
• Review candidate reports that help hiring teams understand strengths and potential job-related abilities.
• Support employee development with tools that provide insight into workplace behavior and growth opportunities.

Cons:

• Narrower than broad assessment suites
• Custom pricing
• Needs a separate tool for coding

User Rating: 4.4/5

Pricing: Custom quote.

My Top Picks Among the Mercer Mettl Alternatives

The right assessment platform depends on whether you’re testing general knowledge, evaluating technical ability, or understanding how candidates may perform at work. These three deserve a closer look.

1. ProProfs Quiz Maker

ProProfs Quiz Maker is my preferred choice for organizations that need to create assessments for different purposes without dealing with a complicated setup.

Its AI question generation, ready-made question library, automatic grading, and reporting make it suitable for employee testing, recruitment, training, and certifications.

The ability to customize assessments and reuse questions also makes it convenient for teams that need to conduct tests regularly.

2. HackerRank

HackerRank deserves a place on the shortlist when technical hiring is a major responsibility.

Its programming challenges, online coding environment, automated evaluation, and live interviews help engineering teams observe how candidates apply their knowledge.

Companies recruiting developers can use these capabilities to make coding assessments a consistent part of their hiring process.

3. Criteria Corp

Criteria Corp is particularly relevant when businesses want to understand the abilities and workplace characteristics of potential employees.

Its combination of skills assessments, personality measures, and structured interviews provides additional information beyond what traditional resumes offer.

This makes it useful for organizations seeking a more complete view of candidate suitability across different job categories.

How I Evaluated These Mercer Mettl Alternatives

Choosing assessment software involves more than counting available tests. I used the following criteria to compare the platforms:

• User reviews and ratings: I looked at G2 scores, but I paid more attention to recurring comments around false proctoring flags, pricing, setup effort, and how stable tests felt for candidates.
• Essential features and functionality: I compared the types of tests each tool offers, including coding, problem-solving, personality, and job-related skills tests. I also looked at test security, automatic grading, reports, certificates, and connections with recruitment software.
• Ease of use: I considered how quickly a non-technical recruiter can build and send a test, and how candidates join, including whether they need an extension, a lockdown browser, or an account.
• Customer support: I reviewed vendor documentation, available support channels, and user feedback on onboarding and response quality. Mettl scores well here, so I treated support from smaller vendors as something to test during a trial.
• Value for money: I compared free-plan restrictions, candidate limits, extra charges, annual subscriptions, and expiring credits to understand the actual cost of using each tool.
• Personal experience and expert opinion: I considered practical experience with assessment tools, official product information, and independent user reviews to understand how well each platform meets different hiring and testing needs.

Move Forward With the Right Assessment Tool

A useful assessment process should answer three questions: What does someone know? How well can they apply that knowledge? What should happen next?

ProProfs Quiz Maker helps businesses turn those questions into assessments that are easy to create, deliver, and evaluate.

You can prepare tests using AI, customize questions for different roles or learning objectives, and share assessments with participants. Automatic grading reduces manual work, while detailed reports help you understand individual performance and identify areas that need attention.

The platform also supports more formal assessment requirements, including controlled access, timers, available anti-cheating features, and certificates.

Whether you are screening applicants, checking employee knowledge, or conducting training evaluations, ProProfs Quiz Maker provides a consistent way to manage the process. 

Start with one assessment your organization needs today. Build it using existing materials or AI, invite participants, and review the results to see how much easier testing can be to manage.