Rlw Prelims Q2: The Selection Of The Philippine National Hero

This statement suggests that a Philippine National Hero should be someone who stands out among others and deserves acknowledgment. This implies that the hero should possess exceptional qualities, achievements, or contributions that set them apart from the rest. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and honoring individuals who have made significant and notable contributions to the country.

The given correct answer suggests that the media favors Bonifacio over Rizal in the comparison of the two national heroes. This can be inferred from the statement "tila pinagsasabong lagi ang dalwang pangunahing bayani ng bansa" which implies that the media constantly pits the two heroes against each other. The answer further supports this by mentioning media works that investigate and question Rizal's status as a hero. Therefore, the explanation is that the media tends to portray Bonifacio more favorably than Rizal in the discussion of who should be the national hero.

Jose Rizal, Andres Bonifacio, and Senator Benigno Aquino are considered national heroes in the Philippines because they are commemorated in public nationwide (national) holidays. This means that their contributions and sacrifices for the country are recognized and celebrated by the entire nation on a yearly basis.

The given correct answer is "BAYANI: ISANG IMBESTIGASYON SA PAGKATAO AT PAKIKIBAKA NI DR. JOSE RIZAL." This answer is correct because it directly corresponds to the title of the media material mentioned in the question. The media material delves deeper into the research on the personality and struggles of Dr. Jose Rizal, suggesting a more comprehensive investigation into his life and contributions.

Rizal met the requirement of being a calm-thinking person. This means that he possessed the trait of remaining composed and level-headed in various situations. This quality would have been important in making rational decisions and maintaining a peaceful demeanor, which are valuable attributes for a hero. While Rizal may have also met the other criteria, such as being a Filipino, being dead, and having a solid sense of patriotism, the emphasis is on his ability to approach situations with a calm and thoughtful mindset.

The correct answer is "The writings of Rizal generated a more lasting achievement to the cause of freedom." This statement is incorrect because Bonifacio's initiation of the Philippine Revolution had a more direct and immediate impact on the cause of freedom compared to Rizal's writings. Bonifacio's actions led to the formation of the Katipunan and the armed resistance against Spanish colonial rule, which eventually led to the independence of the Philippines. Rizal's writings, although influential in inspiring nationalism and advocating for reforms, did not directly result in the same level of tangible achievement as Bonifacio's revolutionary actions.

The correct answer is "The Taft Commission renamed the district of Morong into the Province of Rizal." This action by the Taft Commission was the first official step taken to honor Rizal. By renaming the district, they were recognizing and commemorating the significance of Rizal's contributions and legacy. This renaming also served to establish a permanent and prominent reminder of Rizal's importance in the Philippines.

Renato Constantino and Teodoro Agoncillo are the correct answers because they are historians who never regarded Rizal as a National Hero. They believed that Rizal was endorsed more by the United States than by the Filipinos. This suggests that they had a different perspective on Rizal's role and significance in Philippine history compared to other historians who may have considered him as a National Hero.

The National Heroes Committee recommended the names of historical figures to be recognized as national heroes on November 15, 1995. However, as of today, no action has been taken for these recommended National Heroes. The correct answer includes the names of the historical figures who were recommended by the committee, namely Jose Rizal, Andres Bonifacio, Emilio Aguinaldo, Marcelo H. del Pilar, Juan Luna, Melchora Aquino, Apolinario Mabini, and Sultan Dipatuan Kudarat.

The possible reasons for the selection of Rizal as a hero by the American colonial administration could be that he was a mason, which may have made him more appealing to the American government as they had a strong presence in the Freemasonry society. Additionally, Rizal was already dead and non-violent, making him a safe choice for the American government to promote as a hero. Lastly, Rizal, once emulated by Filipinos, would not threaten American rule, suggesting that his ideals and actions were not seen as a direct challenge to American colonial authority.