Why Did William The Conqueror Win The Battle Of Hastings?

The given correct answer is "True". However, without any context or additional information, it is impossible to provide a specific explanation for why this answer is correct. The answer could be true based on the information provided in the question or the knowledge of the person who created the question. Without further details, it is difficult to determine the exact reason behind the answer.

Harold fought Harald at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. This battle took place in 1066 and was fought between Harold II of England and Harald Hardrada of Norway. It was a significant battle during the Norman Conquest of England. Harold successfully defended England against the Norwegian invasion, but unfortunately, he was defeated by William the Conqueror just a few weeks later at the Battle of Hastings.

The given correct answer is "True". However, without any context or specific question, it is difficult to provide an explanation for why the answer is true. The explanation could vary depending on the topic or subject being discussed. Therefore, without further information, it is not possible to provide a meaningful explanation for the given answer.

William the Conqueror did not have Axemen in his army. Axemen were not a part of his military strategy or tactics. Instead, he relied heavily on cavalry, archers, and infantry. Axemen were not commonly used during the time period in which William the Conqueror lived, and therefore were not included in his army.

Harold let lots of his soldiers go home in September because they were needed to collect in the harvest. This suggests that the soldiers were needed to assist with the agricultural work during the harvest season, which was a crucial time for gathering crops. This decision implies that Harold prioritized the welfare and productivity of his people over the immediate military concerns, recognizing the importance of securing food resources for his kingdom.