Level 4, Unit 9

Deb was in the process of deleting her emails when she noticed a new message.

The correct answer is the given sentence "When a frog jumped into the bathtub, the girl was taking a bath." This answer accurately describes the sequence of events, stating that the girl was already taking a bath when the frog jumped into the bathtub.

The correct answer is "When the lights went off, the little boy was doing homework." This answer accurately describes the sequence of events, indicating that the lights going off happened before the little boy was doing homework.

The given words can be categorized into two groups: body parts and their corresponding joints. The words "leg," "ankle," "knee," and "finger" all refer to body parts, while "eye," "nose," and "thumb" refer to specific joints. The answer, "ankle" and "knee," are the only two words that belong to the joint category, making them the correct answer.

The statement suggests that Deb did not take any action or do anything after losing her email. Therefore, the answer "true" indicates that the statement is correct and accurately reflects Deb's lack of action in response to losing her email.

B is asking if A hurt themselves when they fell down while playing soccer. The word "yourself" is used to refer to the person who fell down, implying that B is concerned about A's well-being.

The given answer "Wow! How embarrassing." is the correct explanation for the situation described in the question. The person initially thought they saw their friend in the restaurant and went to sit with her, but after talking for a minute, they realized that she wasn't their friend. This realization would likely be embarrassing for the person as they made a mistake in recognizing someone they thought they knew.

The correct answer is "When he fell down, the boy was climbing a tree." This answer correctly rearranges the sentence to indicate that the boy was in the process of climbing a tree when he fell down. The phrase "when he fell down" is placed at the beginning of the sentence to emphasize the cause and effect relationship between the two actions.

The correct answer is "Were you cooking something, were you cooking something." This answer is appropriate because it is a question that seeks clarification about the activity of cooking. It is a logical response to A's statement of burning themselves, as it suggests that the burn may have occurred while cooking something on the stove. The repetition of the question adds emphasis and reinforces the inquiry.

B burned themselves while making breakfast, which caused the injury to their hand.

The correct answer is "hurt, Hurt" because the verb "hurt" is used in both the past simple and past participle forms to indicate an injury to the arm that occurred yesterday. The lowercase "hurt" represents the past simple form, while the capitalized "Hurt" represents the past participle form.

B states that they did not go out to dinner for their anniversary, but instead made dinner themselves. This suggests that B and possibly A prepared and cooked a meal at home to celebrate their anniversary, rather than going to a restaurant. The word "ourselves" indicates that B and possibly A were directly involved in the process of making the dinner.

The correct answer is "was looking" and "Was looking". Both options use the past continuous tense to describe an ongoing action in the past. This tense is used when we want to emphasize that the action was happening at a specific point in the past. In this case, the person is describing their past activity of searching for something in the kitchen cabinets.

The question is asking whether Jeff traveled to England by himself. The answer "himself" indicates that Jeff did indeed travel alone. However, the response from person B contradicts this by stating that Jeff went with his parents. Therefore, the correct answer is not "himself" as it does not align with the information given in the conversation.

The correct answer is "was driving" because the sentence is describing an action that was happening in the past. The past continuous tense "was driving" is used to indicate that Lee was in the process of driving at that specific time. "Was driving" is also a valid answer because it is the same tense and conveys the same meaning.

The correct answer is "Oh, no! That was terrible." This is because the narrator ran into a woman and caused her to fall down, resulting in her purse spilling all over the sidewalk. This situation is described as terrible, indicating that it was not a positive or enjoyable experience.

The correct answer expresses concern and asks if the person was able to retrieve their bag. It shows empathy towards the situation and acknowledges the potential distress the person may have felt.

The correct answer is "fell, Fell." The verb "fell" is the past tense of "fall," and it is used to describe an action that happened in the past. In this sentence, the speaker is describing an incident where they fell off the chair. The capitalization of "Fell" indicates that it is the correct answer.

The given words are body parts. Out of the options provided, "eye" and "nose" are both body parts that are located on the face. Therefore, "eye" and "nose" are the correct answers.

The correct answer is "stood, was standing, Was standing, Stood." In this sentence, the speaker is describing an action in the past. The verb "stand" can be used in both the simple past tense ("stood") and the past continuous tense ("was standing"). Additionally, the past continuous tense can be formed using "was" or "were" + the present participle of the verb ("Was standing"). Therefore, all four options are correct.

The correct answer is finger, thumb. The given list consists of body parts, and finger and thumb are both parts of the hand. The other options, ankle, eye, knee, and nose, do not belong in the same category and are not parts of the hand.

B is asking A if they were wearing gloves when they cut their thumb in the garden. This question is asking about a specific detail that could potentially explain how the accident happened. The repetition of "were you wearing gloves" emphasizes the importance of this detail and suggests that wearing gloves could have prevented the injury.

The correct answer is "I bet you were upset." This response is the most appropriate because it acknowledges the fact that the person forgot about the expensive tickets and implies that they would have been upset about missing the game as a result. The other options do not address the potential disappointment or frustration that the person may have experienced.

not-available-via-ai

not-available-via-ai

Rick and his girlfriend were looking at their menus when the cell phone rang. This suggests that they were in the process of deciding what to order or discussing their meal options when they were interrupted by the phone call.

The correct answer options for this question are all variations of "didn't notice" and "did not notice." These options are correct because they use the negative form of the verb "notice" (i.e., "didn't" or "did not") to indicate that the subject did not observe or become aware of the dog in the middle of the road. The variations in capitalization and punctuation do not affect the correctness of the answer.

The other customers didn't eat their meal because they had to leave.

The correct answer is "stopped" because it is the past tense form of the verb "stop" and matches the subject "he" in the sentence. The word "Stopped" is also correct because it is the past participle form of the verb "stop" and can be used in certain contexts, such as in passive voice constructions. Both forms are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably depending on the context of the sentence.

B is asking Julie if she was driving to work when the car accident occurred. The repetition of the question "were you driving to work" emphasizes the curiosity and surprise of B upon hearing about the accident.

The correct answer is "Were you lifting something, were you lifting something." This response suggests that Tom may have hurt his back while lifting something at work, and the speaker is asking if that was the cause of his injury. The repetition of the question indicates a concern for the specific activity of lifting as a potential cause for the back injury.

The correct answer is "didn't hit" or "Didn't hit" or "didn´t hit" or "Didn´t hit". This is the negative form of the past tense of the verb "hit". It is used to indicate that someone did not perform the action of hitting something in the past.