The 'Evaluating Websites Quiz: MCQ!' assesses the ability to discern reputable and biased websites, focusing on criteria such as authorship, references, and potential biases. This quiz is essential for developing critical web evaluation skills.
Author has academic credentials supporting the article.
Author has several links to .com websites.
Author is writing about an innovative idea.
Rate this question:
References are listed, along with links to supporting information.
Website is designed well and easy to navigate.
Date is current.
Rate this question:
The author has the appropriate credentials.
The article is long and well-written.
The author has written other articles.
Rate this question:
Greenpeace.org
CDC.gov
Time.com
Rate this question:
Wikipedia is never a valid source.
If the Wikipedia entry has footnotes and references listed.
If the article seems well-researched and well-written.
Rate this question:
The website includes several links to other reputable websites.
An author is listed.
The website ends in .gov.
Rate this question:
Can still be questionable based on other ways to test the website.
Is accurate because the writing is on an academic level.
Is questionable because it's difficult to understand.
Rate this question:
The publishing date is this year.
The publishing date is missing.
Publishing date links to current information.
Rate this question:
A website with extensive references but no author listed.
Website with the company as the author but no person listed.
Website with information that is not recent.
Rate this question:
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Mar 21, 2023 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.