12 Angry Men Movie Quiz
-
In the 1957 film "12 Angry Men," what is the initial vote count among the jurors regarding the defendant's guilt?
-
12-0 guilty
-
11-1 guilty
-
6-6 split
-
10-2 guilty sleep
-
Are you captivated by the gripping narrative of the 1957 American courtroom drama film, ‘12 Angry Men’? Do you find yourself drawn to the intense deliberations and character dynamics that unfold in this cinematic masterpiece? If so, our ‘12 Angry Men Movie Quiz’ is just for you!
This trivia quiz is designed to test your memory and knowledge of this classic See morefilm. Set in the aftermath of a murder trial’s closing arguments, ‘12 Angry Men’ follows the deliberations of a jury tasked with deciding the fate of a teenager.
This quiz offers you a chance to dive back into the courtroom and revisit the compelling arguments and dramatic twists that make ‘12 Angry Men’ a timeless classic. So, are you ready to step into the jury box and prove your fandom? Take the quiz, and best of luck!
(294).jpg "12 Angry Men Movie Quiz - Quiz")
Quiz Preview
- 2.
Some of the jurors had a personal prejudice towards the case. Which best describes the personal prejudice of juror number 10?
-
Age prejudice
-
Gender prejudice
-
Racial prejudice
-
He had no prejudice
Correct Answer
A. Racial prejudiceExplanation
Juror number 10's personal prejudice is best described as racial prejudice. This means that he holds biased views and discriminates against individuals based on their race. This can negatively impact his ability to make fair and impartial judgments in the case at hand.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
During the second jury vote (the secret ballot of 11), who was the only juror to vote "not guilty"?
-
8
-
9
-
3
-
7
Correct Answer
A. 8Explanation
In "Twelve Angry Men," during the second jury vote, Juror 8 is the only one who votes "not guilty," initiating deliberations. His insistence on examining the evidence and ensuring a fair trial challenges the group's consensus, leading to intense discussions that reveal biases and flaws in the case presented.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
What sort of knife was used to kill the murdered man?
-
Switch-blade knife
-
Kitchen knife
-
Hunting knife
-
Machete
Correct Answer
A. Switch-blade knifeExplanation
The correct answer is switch-blade knife. A switch-blade knife is a type of folding knife with a blade that can be deployed automatically by pressing a button or lever. This type of knife is often associated with criminal activities due to its concealability and ease of use. In the context of the question, the fact that a switch-blade knife was used suggests that the murderer may have had malicious intent and wanted a weapon that could be easily concealed or used quickly.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
What physical disability did the old man who lived downstairs have?
-
Poor eyesight
-
Bad legs -- used canes or a walker
-
Hard of hearing
-
Stuttered when he talked
Correct Answer
A. Bad legs -- used canes or a walkerExplanation
The old man who lived downstairs had bad legs and used canes or a walker. This physical disability affected his ability to walk properly, hence the need for assistance from canes or a walker.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
In what way had the knife been stabbed into the body?
-
It had been slashed across the man's throat
-
Stabbed downwards and into the chest
-
Jabbed upwards into the man's stomach
-
Rammed into the center of the man's back
Correct Answer
A. Stabbed downwards and into the chestExplanation
The correct answer is "stabbed downwards and into the chest". This answer suggests that the knife was forcefully thrust into the chest area in a downward motion. This implies a deliberate and aggressive act, possibly indicating an intention to cause harm or even kill the person. The other options mentioned, such as slashing across the throat, jabbing upwards into the stomach, or ramming into the back, do not accurately describe the specific manner in which the knife was inserted into the body.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
Which one of the following is true about the location of the apartment where the murder was committed?
-
Very close to the elevated railway system
-
Next to the city center bus depot
-
Very close to a big airport
-
Very close to the Brooklyn Bridge
Correct Answer
A. Very close to the elevated railway systemExplanation
The correct answer is "very close to the elevated railway system". This means that the location of the apartment where the murder was committed is in close proximity to the elevated railway system. This information suggests that the apartment is likely to be located in an area with easy access to public transportation and may be situated in an urban or city setting.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
How does juror number 3 justify his assertion that the defendant must have meant it when he said, "I'm going to kill you!"?
-
He states that people always say what they mean when they are angry.
-
He states that nobody says such words without meaning them.
-
He states that the defendant shouted the words angrily.
-
He states that he meant it because he then proceeded to kill.
Correct Answer
A. He states that nobody says such words without meaning them.Explanation
In the movie “12 Angry Men”, Juror number 3 asserts that the defendant must have meant it when he said “I’m going to kill you!” He justifies this by stating that nobody says such words without meaning them. This reflects his belief that people’s words, especially when spoken in anger or high emotion, are a direct reflection of their intentions. However, this perspective is challenged in the film, highlighting the importance of considering context and not jumping to conclusions.Rate this question:
-
- 9.
On what simple fact does the entire case ultimately hang?
-
The fact that the witness sees the murder through a passing train.
-
The fact that the defendant is shorter than the victim.
-
The fact that the alleged eyewitness has impaired vision, and may not have clearly seen what she thought she saw.
-
The fact that the murder weapon is not as unusual as the testimony suggested.
Correct Answer
A. The fact that the alleged eyewitness has impaired vision, and may not have clearly seen what she thought she saw.Explanation
The entire case ultimately hangs on the fact that the alleged eyewitness has impaired vision, and may not have clearly seen what she thought she saw. This fact raises doubts about the accuracy and reliability of her testimony, which is crucial in determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant. If her vision impairment affected her ability to see the murder accurately, then her testimony may not be credible, casting doubt on the validity of the case against the defendant.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
What is the age of the old man who lives downstairs in the apartment below?
-
75
-
85
-
83
-
90
Correct Answer
A. 75Explanation
The correct answer is 75 because it is the only age mentioned in the options.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
As Act 2 progresses, how does number 3's attitude contrast with the attitude of number 4?
-
No. 3 has a closed mind, while No. 4 is willing to listen and consider new possibilities.
-
No. 3 is a bully, while No. 4 acts as if he has superior knowledge.
-
No. 3 is irrational, while No. 4 reasons out his contributions carefully.
-
None of the above
Correct Answer
A. No. 3 has a closed mind, while No. 4 is willing to listen and consider new possibilities.Explanation
In Act 2, number 3's attitude contrasts with number 4's attitude because number 3 has a closed mind, while number 4 is willing to listen and consider new possibilities. This is evident in their behavior and interactions throughout the act. Number 3 consistently dismisses and rejects any ideas or suggestions that differ from his own, showing a lack of openness and unwillingness to consider alternative perspectives. On the other hand, number 4 actively engages in dialogue, listens to others, and is open to exploring different possibilities, demonstrating a more receptive and open-minded attitude.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
How does juror number 8 get the others to realize that the defendant might not have killed his father, although he said, "I'm gonna kill you!"?
-
He says the defendant might just have been angry.
-
He says that many people say things they don't really mean.
-
He says the defendant might have been provoked by his father.
-
He asks them to consider how many times they have said similar words with no intention to kill.
Correct Answer
A. He asks them to consider how many times they have said similar words with no intention to kill.Explanation
Juror number 8 gets the others to realize that the defendant might not have killed his father by asking them to consider how many times they have said similar words with no intention to kill. This prompts the jurors to reflect on their own experiences and understand that words spoken in anger or frustration do not always reflect one's true intentions. By making this comparison, juror number 8 challenges the assumption that the defendant's statement necessarily implies guilt, leading the others to reconsider their initial judgments.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
What part do the jurors' voting episodes play in "Twelve Angry Men"?
-
They are significant stages in the shift of power.
-
They are significant points in the evolution of the plot.
-
They symbolize the impact of jurors' arguments against one another.
-
They determine the level of hostility evident in the play.
Correct Answer
A. They are significant points in the evolution of the plot.Explanation
The jurors' voting episodes in "Twelve Angry Men" are significant points in the evolution of the plot. These episodes mark the progress of the deliberations and demonstrate the changing opinions and attitudes of the jurors. As the jurors vote and discuss the case, the audience witnesses the development of the plot and the gradual shift towards a unanimous decision. The voting episodes serve as key moments that drive the narrative forward and reveal the dynamics and conflicts within the jury room.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
What was juror number 3 doing that made juror number 8 angry, causing him to exclaim, "This isn't a game!"
-
Playing hangman
-
Doing a crossword puzzle doing a crossword puzzle
-
Playing tic-tac-toe with juror 12
-
Reading a newspaper
Correct Answer
A. Playing tic-tac-toe with juror 12Explanation
Juror number 8 became angry and exclaimed "This isn't a game!" because juror number 3 was playing tic-tac-toe with juror 12. This behavior was likely seen as disrespectful and inappropriate given the serious nature of the jury deliberation. Juror number 8 may have felt that juror number 3 was not taking the case seriously and was not fully engaged in the discussion.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
Which of the following appears to be true about the fatal wound?
-
It was probably made by someone who was an expert knife-fighter.
-
It was self-inflicted.
-
It had to have been made by someone taller than the victim.
-
It was likely made by someone holding the switchblade in an awkward manner
Correct Answer
A. It was likely made by someone holding the switchblade in an awkward mannerExplanation
The correct answer suggests that the fatal wound was likely made by someone holding the switchblade in an awkward manner. This implies that the person who inflicted the wound may not have been skilled or experienced in using a knife. The use of the term "awkward manner" suggests that the person may have been unfamiliar with how to properly handle a switchblade, resulting in a less precise and potentially more haphazard wound.Rate this question:
-
Quiz Review Timeline (Updated): Dec 16, 2024 +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
-
Current Version
-
Dec 16, 2024Quiz Edited by
ProProfs Editorial Team -
Jan 13, 2011Quiz Created by
Moabjeff
Back to top