Repaso Sobre Referencias Y Conectores

The missing connector in the given expression is "Sin embargo". This is because the sentence before the blank states that Abundio does not usually talk to people his age, implying that he may be shy or introverted. However, the use of "Sin embargo" indicates a contrast or contradiction, suggesting that despite his usual behavior, Abundio unexpectedly greeted Patricia.

The correct answer is "Adición" because the phrase "además" (in addition) indicates that the speaker is adding more information about their preferences for novels. This connector is used to join two similar or related ideas together, emphasizing that the speaker enjoys both science fiction novels and suspense and detective novels.

The correct answer is "Adición" because the sentence is using the connector "además" which means "in addition" or "also" to add more information to the previous statement. This connector is used to join two similar ideas or concepts together.

The missing connector in the given expression is "pero". This is because the phrase "ciertamente nos enseñan la realidad" suggests that the media does teach us the reality, but the addition of "pero" indicates that they do so in their own way, implying that their portrayal may not always be completely accurate or unbiased.

The correct answer is "Adición" because the connector "además" is used in the sentence to indicate the addition of information. It shows that in addition to renting a small house on the beach, César González Martínez also bought a second-hand truck.

The correct answer is "Contraste" because the sentence uses the conjunction "sin embargo" which means "however" or "nevertheless". This conjunction is used to introduce a contrast or contradiction between the two clauses in the sentence. The first clause states that the children were calm, but the second clause contradicts this by saying that it was only for a short time. This contrast in information is indicated by the use of the conjunction "sin embargo".

The correct answer is "Contraste, secuencia, causa, causa, adición, causa". The first connector "Contraste" indicates a contrast between the delay in responding and the person being a good person. The second connector "secuencia" shows a sequence of events, mentioning the waiting for Christmas, New Year, and now January 20th. The third and fourth connectors "causa" indicate the reason for the disappointment and the inability to come on certain dates. The fifth connector "adición" adds that the person is missed. And the last connector "causa" again indicates the reason for hoping that the person can come before the carnival holidays.

The given expression "El juez indicó que lo dejaría, siempre que no se reunieran las pruebas suficientes para acusarlo" indicates a conditional relationship. The use of "siempre que" (always that) introduces a condition that needs to be met in order for the judge to let him go. The phrase suggests that if the necessary evidence is not gathered to accuse him, then the judge will allow him to go free.

Si usted está desempleado, entonces no está produciendo. Por ello, la economía no estará operando con plena capacidad. Igualmente importante es el hecho de que usted no está comprando. En otras palabras, cuando está desempleado, usted está por debajo de su consumo normal.

La oración "A pesar de la larga cola que tuvo que realizar Julián, él pudo ingresar al concierto, pues allí se presentaron varios cantantes de moda: Pedro Suárez, Guajaja, Celia Cruz, entre otros" contiene dos anáforas y una catáfora. La primera anáfora es "él", que hace referencia a Julián. La segunda anáfora es "allí", que hace referencia al concierto. La catáfora es "varios cantantes de moda", que anticipa la lista de cantantes mencionados posteriormente.

The given answer contains two anaphoras and one cataphora. The anaphoras are "Esto se puede hacer de la siguiente manera" and "Todo ello generará un compromiso hacia la empresa," which refer back to the previous sentence. The cataphora is "alimentar sus deseos de triunfo y estimular al éxito," which refers to the actions that can be taken to motivate the seller before they are mentioned.

The correct answer is the last option. In this sentence, the word "esto" is an anaphora that refers back to the previous sentence "motivar al vendedor". Additionally, the phrase "Todo ello" is another anaphora that refers back to the previous actions mentioned in the sentence "alimentar sus deseos de triunfo y estimular al éxito".

In this sentence, there is a case of ellipsis where the subject "Fabio" is omitted in the second sentence. The complete sentence would be "Fabio obtuvo la beca. Él viajó a París, la Ciudad Luz." However, the subject pronoun "él" is not necessary since it is clear from the context that "Fabio" is the one who traveled to Paris.

The correct answer is "Anita buscó su muñeca por toda la habitación. No encontró nada y lloró tristemente." This sentence demonstrates ellipsis because it omits the verb "buscar" in the second clause. The full sentence would be "Anita buscó su muñeca por toda la habitación. No encontró su muñeca y lloró tristemente." However, the verb "buscar" is understood and implied in the second clause, making it an example of ellipsis.

The correct answer is "Contraste". The phrase "no obstante" indicates a contrast between the exhaustion of Juan José Jiménez and his excellent work. This contrast is further emphasized by the use of the semicolon before "no obstante".

The correct answer is "Adición, equivalencia, secuencia, evidencia, condicional."

In the given sentences, the underlined connectors are used to add information, show equivalence, indicate a sequence of events, provide evidence, and express a conditional statement. The first connector "también" (also) adds information about the transportation operating in Callao. The second connector "en otros términos" (in other words) shows equivalence between the classification of AH1N1 and a pandemic. The third connector "luego" (then) indicates a sequence of events. The fourth connector "se sabe que" (it is known that) provides evidence for Agustín Lizárraga's arrival. The fifth connector "con tal de que" (as long as) expresses a conditional statement.

The given text contains two anaphoras. The first anaphora is "El colaborador logró su máximo objetivo: ascender" which is repeated as "Esto generó admiración entre los trabajadores". The second anaphora is "Ellos mostraron entusiasmo" which refers back to "los trabajadores". Therefore, the correct answer is 2.

The given statement contains four ellipses. An ellipsis is a figure of speech that is used to omit certain words or phrases that are understood in the context. In this statement, the ellipses are used to omit the subject and verb in each sentence. For example, "En las tardes" (In the afternoons) is an ellipse that omits the subject and verb. The same pattern is repeated in the other sentences, resulting in a total of four ellipses in the statement.

The given answer is correct because it includes two examples of anaphora and one example of ellipsis. In the passage, the pronoun "este" is used to refer back to the cisne (swan), creating an anaphoric reference. Additionally, the omission of the subject pronoun "él" before "apuntaba con un rifle" is an example of ellipsis, where the subject is understood from the context.

The correct answer is the last option. In this sentence, there is an anaphora, as "su futuro yerno" refers back to "una persona importante" mentioned earlier. There is also a cataphora, as "su futuro yerno" is mentioned before it is introduced as "una persona importante". Lastly, there is an ellipsis, as the subject of the second sentence is omitted, but it is understood that it is referring to Don Eulogio.

not-available-via-ai

The given text consists of three sentences that are related to each other. The first sentence states that the collaborator achieved their maximum goal, which implies that they were able to ascend. The second sentence mentions that this achievement generated admiration among the workers. The third sentence states that the workers showed enthusiasm. Therefore, the text contains two anaphoras, as the pronoun "esto" in the second sentence refers back to the achievement mentioned in the first sentence, and the pronoun "ellos" in the third sentence refers back to the workers mentioned in the second sentence.

The given statement consists of four ellipses. Each time a new activity is mentioned, it is implied that Lucero finishes the previous one. The first ellipsis is between "En las mañanas de sol, Lucero sale a pasear por el parque" and "Luego, corre por la playa." The second ellipsis is between "Luego, corre por la playa" and "Compra helados." The third ellipsis is between "Compra helados" and "camina a su casa." The fourth ellipsis is between "camina a su casa" and "Finalmente, duerme exhausta."

The given text contains three anaphoric references. The first one is "su mejor marca" which refers back to the athlete's achievement. The second one is "él" which refers back to the athlete himself. The third one is "él" again, which refers back to the same athlete. Therefore, the correct answer is 3.

The passage provides evidence by stating that deciphering ancient writings is more difficult when the language is unknown and relies on the discovery of bilingual documents. This evidence leads to the consequence that the Rosetta Stone, which contains a text written in Egyptian hieroglyphics and Greek, allowed scholars to decipher the lost language. The passage then contrasts the use of bilingual texts with the ingenuity required when there are no bilingual texts. Finally, it states that Michael Ventris successfully deciphered Minoan writing using code-breaking techniques, which serves as a cause for the triumph of ingenuity. Therefore, the correct answer is "Evidencia, consecuencia, contraste, contraste, causa."

The given text contains three anaphoras. An anaphora is a rhetorical device that involves the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of multiple sentences. In this case, the word "ella" (she) is repeated at the beginning of three sentences: "Ella averiguó sobre las posibles universidades", "Ella encontró CPEL", and "Ella tendría la mejor educación". Therefore, the correct answer is 3.

The correct answer is "Dialogar con los padres acerca de sus años de juventud suele ser una experiencia enriquecedora. Evidentemente, este adulto regresa a una etapa en la cual experimentó el primer amor y las mujeres que, ahora, su joven hijo atraviesa; siempre que el padre por medio del diálogo, vuelve a sentir la naturaleza del amor, fantasía e ilusión." This is an incorrect use of connectors because the sentence does not flow logically. The use of "siempre que" does not connect the ideas properly and creates confusion in the sentence.

The given passage contains four ellipses. The first ellipsis is in the sentence "Paola laboró en una firma de alcance mundial por 10 años." Here, the verb "trabajó" is omitted after the subject "Paola." The second ellipsis is in the sentence "Luego, decidió abrir su propio negocio." Here, the verb "decidió" is omitted after the subject "Paola." The third ellipsis is in the sentence "Así nació Dulce Antojito." Here, the verb "nació" is omitted after the subject "Dulce Antojito." The fourth ellipsis is in the sentence "Ahora, tiene 15 pedidos a la semana." Here, the verb "tiene" is omitted after the subject "Paola."

The given answer demonstrates a case of ellipsis because it omits the repetition of the subject "una hectárea de fresas" in the second sentence. The subject is implied and understood to be the same as in the previous sentence.

The correct answer is "Causa - adición - contraste". In the given expression, the first connector "Causa" is used to introduce the reason why some people started to complain when it was time to return. The second connector "adición" is used to add information about the complete and healthy fun that everyone had during the outing. The third connector "contraste" is used to contrast the initial happiness with the later complaints.

The given answer of 4 is correct because there are four instances of ellipsis in the sentence. The first ellipsis occurs after "Dulce Antojito" where it is implied that Paola opened her own business. The second ellipsis occurs after "proveer de papitas dulces y saladas" where it is implied that Dulce Antojito provides snacks at parties. The third ellipsis occurs after "Fue una gran novedad" where it is implied that the business was a big success. The fourth ellipsis occurs after "Ahora" where it is implied that the business currently has 15 orders per week.

not-available-via-ai

not-available-via-ai

The correct answer is "Adición - causa - secuencia - contraste - consecuencia". This sequence of connectors is used to connect the different ideas in the passage. The first connector "Adición" (addition) is used to add more information about the cruelty of the interrogation. The second connector "causa" (cause) is used to explain the reason for the cruelty, which is the use of both physical and psychological torture. The third connector "secuencia" (sequence) is used to indicate a sequence of events, highlighting that Olaya did not reveal any names. The fourth connector "contraste" (contrast) is used to contrast Olaya's decision with the torture he endured, emphasizing his love for his country. Finally, the fifth connector "consecuencia" (consequence) is used to explain the result of Olaya's actions, being remembered as a courageous man and an example.