.
Employs distributed processes
Relies on a central executive to coordinate processing
Uses local representations rather than distributed representations
Draws mostly on serial processing
Anterograde amnesia
Repression
Retrograde amnesia
Infantile amnesia
Disclusion–Recall–Memory procedure
Decreased-Remembering-Magniture procedure
Deese–Roediger–McDermott procedure
Daily-Reconstructing-Mnemonics procedure
Participants who were asked the “smashed” question gave higher estimates of speed and were more likely to remember seeing broken glass
The groups gave similar estimates of speed, but the “smashed” group was more likely to remember seeing broken glass
Participants who were asked the “smashed” question gave higher estimates of speed, but the groups gave similar responses to the “broken glass” question
The minor contrast in how the groups were questioned had no effect on participants’ memories
One cannot specify precisely whether a test case is in the category
Some category members are better suited than others as category members
A participant’s belief about a category’s membership shifts as the participant learns more about the category
Many category members approach the ideal for that category
Seems restricted to small memory errors
Is only possible if done by an authority figure
Seems possible for remembered actions but not remembered objects
Can occur outside of the laboratory
Ego directive
Autobiographical perspective advantage
Self-reference effect
Self-importance law
Level of categorization regarded by most participants as indisputable
Most general level of categorization participants can think of
Most specific level of categorization participants can think of
Most natural level of categorization, neither too specific nor too general
Knowledge of how we spend our Tuesday nights
Ideas about our political beliefs when young
Accurate memories about poor grades
Our usual behaviors
The beginning moments of the node’s response
How strongly the node has to respond in order to influence other nodes
The level of activation that will cause the node to fire
The maximum rate at which the node will respond
Are receiving activation from both the nodes representing the learned material and the nodes representing the participants’ state
Are associated indirectly only with the material that had been learned earlier
Have higher response thresholds in some states than in others
Probably have a low degree of fan
Repression
Retrieval failure
Interference
State dependency
Participants are slowed by semantic ambiguity
Participants’ responses are faster to perceptual properties than to conceptual ones
Participants are faster in judging “isa” associations than they are in judging “hasa” associations
The property of having feathers is associated with the bird node, not the canary node
The relationship between thoughts and concepts
The speed with which a node will respond to a given input
How many associative links radiate out from a node
The rate at which activation of a node returns to baseline levels
It allows the largest possible number of nodes to be activated.
It prevents stronger nodes from excessively inhibiting the input of weaker nodes.
It provides a selective mechanism so that distracting thoughts do not trigger other distracting thoughts.
It promotes activation of side-thoughts, which in turn promotes the discovery of novel associations.
Hard to construct
Our memories
Sparse
Not really important
The definition of each category
Feature overlap among the members of a category
The necessary conditions for membership in a category
The sufficient conditions for membership in a category
Faster responses to “robin” because participants more readily see the resemblance between “robin” and the bird prototype
Faster responses to “penguin” because penguins are a unique bird, thus easily identified
Faster responses to “robin” because of response priming
Faster responses to “penguin” because penguins are higher in typicality
The standard used in a particular category can vary from one occasion to the next
One categorizes objects by comparing them to a mentally represented standard
Categorization depends on a judgment of resemblance
Categories are represented in the mind by a relatively concrete illustration of the category
There is a strong resemblance between plums and lawn mowers
Resemblance is not influenced by shared traits
In judging resemblance, we must determine which traits matter and which do not
Distinctive traits, not shared traits, determine resemblance judgments
A lexical decision
Word-stem completion
Semantic priming
Explicit memory
Associative link
Nodal highway
Axon
Memory tie
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.