The correct answer to this question will be based on the needs of the company. Both manual and automation have their strengths and weaknesses. However, the company must choose the one that is more successful for them. When comparing the two, many will immediately prefer automation testing.
This is because automation testing is more reliable and is innovative. This is why it is growing at a rapid rate among companies. With each growing technological advancement, automation is growing more and more. This is a good thing for companies because automation testing is a lower cost, and it will save the company time.
When it comes to manual or automation, the best would be dependent on what the company finds more successful for their company. This is because each has their benefits, but what works best will depend on the company. Many companies will prefer automated testing to manual. This is because automated testing is seen as more innovative, reliable, and more credible.
As technology continues to grow, automation also continues to increase. Compared to manual testing, automated testing is faster and it reduces costs because it eliminates some of the workload that others perform. Along with that, automate testing has no errors, which can prevent the need from doing it again.
Both testing mechanisms have their strength and weaknesses. Well, automated testing is far more preferable and is way more credible, reliable, and innovative. The rate at which automation is moving, it has a broader future scope compared to manual testing. In recent times, automated testing in the software world has gained more ground due to its effectiveness and credibility and the fact that it has contributed to the overall development of software.
The reasons why automation testing is preferable compared to manual testing include; Automation testing is faster, cost-effective and reliable It increases test coverage; say the company involved has a large database. Test results are more accurate, error-free and precise It has a better execution control as such, making it quite easy to track its movement. It provides a more concise and accurate service