How Would You Grade Your Incumbent For Congress, Jared Polis?

Explanation
A balanced budget amendment could limit the ability of future policy makers to use fiscal policy to counteract recessions or respond to national emergencies. This is because during times of economic downturn or crisis, deficit spending is often necessary to stimulate the economy or provide necessary relief. By restricting the government's ability to spend beyond its revenue, a balanced budget amendment could hinder the government's ability to effectively respond to these situations.

Explanation
Raising the debt ceiling allows the government to avoid a funding crisis and prevents the United States from defaulting on its debts. By raising the debt ceiling, the government can continue to borrow money and meet its financial obligations. This helps to maintain stability in the economy and ensures that the government can continue to provide essential services and programs.

Explanation
Public broadcasting provides the public access to great music, art, and literature programming that is not available on network television, cable, or private radio. This programming is valuable and enriches the cultural landscape. While technology and cable channels have expanded access to information, public broadcasting still serves as an important platform for unique and diverse content that may not otherwise be accessible to the public. Cutting funding to NPR would limit the availability of this content and deprive the public of the opportunity to engage with it.

Explanation
The given answer suggests that the person is in favor of providing amnesty to children of illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for five years or more. This implies that they believe these children should be granted legal status or citizenship despite their parents' illegal status. It is likely that the person supports this stance due to humanitarian reasons, recognizing that these children have often grown up in the United States and consider it their home, and should not be penalized for their parents' actions.

Explanation
The given correct answer is "Yes." This suggests that the person would have voted to extend the Bush tax cuts. However, without any additional context or information, it is difficult to provide a specific explanation for why the person would choose this option. The reasons for supporting the extension of the tax cuts could vary, such as believing it would stimulate economic growth, benefit businesses, or provide tax relief for individuals.

Explanation
The given answer suggests that the person would have voted to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." This policy, implemented in the United States military, prohibited openly gay individuals from serving. By choosing "Yes," it implies that the person supports the repeal of this policy, allowing LGBTQ+ individuals to serve openly in the military.

Explanation
The given answer "Yes" suggests that the person would have voted in favor of the Food Safety Modernization Act. This implies that the person supports the act and believes it is necessary for ensuring food safety. However, without further context or information, it is difficult to provide a more detailed explanation for why the person would have voted "Yes" on this act.

Explanation
The given answer suggests that the person was in favor of the $820 billion stimulus package of 2009. However, without any further context or explanation, it is unclear why the person supported the stimulus package. Possible reasons could include believing that it would help stimulate the economy, create jobs, or provide necessary support during a recession.

Explanation
The given answer "Yes" indicates that the person was in favor of the Cap & Trade Energy tax and supported the increase of $846 billion in taxes.

Explanation
The given answer "No" suggests that the person would not have voted to repeal the Affordable Care Act. This indicates that the person supports keeping the Affordable Care Act in place and believes that it is beneficial.

Explanation
The individual would not have voted to extend the Patriot Act for 90 days and three provisions of the act.

Explanation
The correct answer is State legislature. This is because the regulation of medical marijuana falls under the jurisdiction of individual states, as they have the authority to create and enforce their own laws regarding healthcare and drug policies. By allowing state legislatures to legislate medical marijuana, it allows for more flexibility and adaptability to the specific needs and preferences of each state's population. Additionally, state legislatures are closer to the people and can better understand and respond to the unique circumstances and concerns of their constituents when it comes to medical marijuana legislation.

Explanation
The given answer suggests that the person would have voted to audit the Federal Reserve system. This indicates that they support the idea of conducting an audit on the Federal Reserve system, which is the central banking system of the United States. An audit of the Federal Reserve system would involve a thorough examination of its financial records and operations to ensure transparency and accountability. This answer implies that the person believes that auditing the Federal Reserve system is necessary or beneficial for some reason.

Explanation
The given question asks whether the person would have voted to bring civil contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder. The correct answer, "No," indicates that the person would not have voted to bring civil contempt charges against Holder. This suggests that the person does not believe that Holder should be held in civil contempt.

Explanation
The given question asks whether the person would have voted in contempt against Attorney General Eric Holder. The answer "Unsure" indicates that the person is uncertain or lacks a clear opinion on whether they would have voted in contempt against Holder. It implies that the person does not have enough information or has mixed feelings about the situation, leading to their uncertainty.

Explanation
The given answer "No" indicates that the person would not have voted in favor of the House GOP $3.5 trillion budget plan proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan.

Explanation
The given correct answer is "Yes" because the JOBS Act is intended to make it easier for small businesses. By voting in favor of the act, one would be supporting measures to promote growth and innovation in small businesses, potentially leading to job creation and economic development.

Explanation
The given answer suggests that the person would have voted to cut House salaries and expenses by 5%. This indicates that they are in favor of reducing the financial burden on the House by reducing salaries and expenses. They believe that this cut would be beneficial and necessary.

Explanation
The correct answer is No because the explanation states that only 3% of Planned Parenthood services are related to abortion, while the majority of their services focus on preventing unwanted pregnancies and providing healthcare services such as STI/HIV screening tests, annual exams, breast cancer screenings, birth control, and family planning. Cutting their funding would lead to more health issues for people who rely on their services, resulting in increased costs for public services provided by the government. Additionally, the explanation clarifies that Planned Parenthood does not use federal money for abortion services.

Explanation
The given answer "No" suggests that the person would not vote to block ObamaCare funding. This indicates that the person is in favor of continuing the funding for ObamaCare.

Explanation
The correct answer is "No" because the passage of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (H.R. 3) would have negative consequences. It would ban abortion coverage in state health-insurance exchanges, penalize small businesses and individuals who purchase private health plans with abortion coverage, and make current-law bans on abortion permanent. Therefore, if someone does not support these restrictions and wants to maintain access to abortion services, they would likely vote against the passage of this act.

Explanation
The given question asks whether the individual would have voted for the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (PRENDA), a ban on sex-selection abortions. The individual's answer is "No," indicating that they would not have voted for this act. However, the reasons behind their decision are not provided in the question, so we cannot determine their rationale for choosing this answer.

Explanation
The given question asks whether the individual would have voted for the American Clean Energy and Security Act (HR 2454). The answer "Yes" indicates that the individual would have supported and voted for the act. However, without further context or information about the act and its provisions, it is difficult to provide a more detailed explanation.

Explanation
The given question asks whether the person would have voted for the Restore Our American Mustangs Act, which aims to improve the management and long-term health of wild free-roaming horses and burros. The answer "No" suggests that the person would not have voted for this act.