Legal Terminology - Chapter 1

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Dixie_King
D
Dixie_King
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 1 | Total Attempts: 276
Questions: 12 | Attempts: 277

SettingsSettingsSettings
Legal Quizzes & Trivia

This quiz will cover information contained in Chapter 1 of your textbook; federal and state jurisdiction.


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 

    The power of two or more courts to decide a particular case is called:

    • A.

      Original jurisdiction

    • B.

      Appellate jurisdiction

    • C.

      Concurrent jurisdiction

    Correct Answer
    C. Concurrent jurisdiction
    Explanation
    Concurrent jurisdiction refers to the power of two or more courts to decide a particular case. This means that multiple courts have the authority to hear and determine the same case, allowing individuals to choose which court they want to bring their case to. This can occur when there are overlapping jurisdictions or when different courts have the power to hear cases of the same nature.

    Rate this question:

  • 2. 

    If, by chance, a court should hear a particular case and make a decision without having jurisdiction, the decision would be meaningless.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    If a court hears a case and makes a decision without having jurisdiction, it means that the court does not have the legal authority to hear and decide that particular case. In such a situation, the decision made by the court would be considered meaningless because it would not hold any legal validity or enforceability. Jurisdiction is a fundamental requirement for a court to have the power to hear and decide a case, and without it, any decision made by the court would lack legal significance. Therefore, the statement "the decision would be meaningless" accurately reflects the consequence of a court making a decision without jurisdiction.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    The Federal Court System was established by the:

    • A.

      President

    • B.

      U.S. Constitution

    • C.

      Congress

    Correct Answer
    B. U.S. Constitution
    Explanation
    The Federal Court System was established by the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution grants the power to establish the federal courts to the legislative branch, which is Congress. Article III of the Constitution outlines the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system, including the establishment of the Supreme Court and the authority of Congress to create lower federal courts. Therefore, the U.S. Constitution is the correct answer as it is the foundational document that establishes the framework for the federal court system.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    The court where the plaintiff lives has jurisdiction over the defendant.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    B. False
    Explanation
    The court where the plaintiff lives does not necessarily have jurisdiction over the defendant. Jurisdiction is typically determined by factors such as the location where the incident occurred or where the defendant resides. Therefore, the statement is false.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    Cases heard by the U.S. courts of appeal are decided by three judges.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    The statement is true because cases heard by the U.S. courts of appeal are typically decided by a panel of three judges. This panel reviews the decisions made by lower courts and determines whether they were correct based on the law. The involvement of multiple judges allows for a broader range of perspectives and helps ensure a fair and balanced decision-making process.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    Which branch of the federal government enforces our laws?

    • A.

      Judicial branch

    • B.

      Legislative branch

    • C.

      Executive branch

    Correct Answer
    C. Executive branch
    Explanation
    The executive branch of the federal government is responsible for enforcing our laws. This branch includes the President, Vice President, and various executive agencies such as the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. They are responsible for implementing and enforcing laws passed by the legislative branch, as well as overseeing the day-to-day operations of the government.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Owing to the fact that the case was being tried for the first time, the court had________  ____________, not appellate jurisdiction.

    Correct Answer
    original jurisdiction
    Explanation
    The court had "original jurisdiction" because it was trying the case for the first time, indicating that it had the authority to hear and decide the case in the first instance, rather than on appeal. This means that the court had the power to hear the case from the beginning and make the initial judgment, rather than reviewing a decision made by another court.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    In addition, because the Salem court was the only one that had the power to hear the case, it had___________   _________________ rather than concurrent jurisdiction.

    Correct Answer
    exclusive jurisdiction
    Explanation
    The Salem court had exclusive jurisdiction because it was the only court with the power to hear the case. This means that no other court had the authority to handle the matter, and only the Salem court had the jurisdiction to make decisions and rulings in this particular case.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    The place where the trial is held is called the _____________.

    Correct Answer
    venue
    Explanation
    The place where the trial is held is referred to as the venue.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    In personam jurisdiction means:

    • A.

      A lawsuit in which the court has jurisdiction over the person

    • B.

      The power or authority that a court has to hear a case

    • C.

      A lawsit in which the court has jurisdiction over property

    Correct Answer
    A. A lawsuit in which the court has jurisdiction over the person
    Explanation
    In personam jurisdiction refers to a lawsuit where the court has the authority to exercise jurisdiction over the person involved in the case. This means that the court has the power to make decisions and rulings that directly affect the individual named in the lawsuit. In personam jurisdiction is based on the principle that a court's authority extends to the individuals involved in the legal dispute, rather than just the property or subject matter of the case.

    Rate this question:

  • 11. 

    Circuits is the name given to the division of U.S. district courts.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    The statement is true because circuits are indeed the name given to the division of U.S. district courts. The United States is divided into 13 judicial circuits, each comprising several states, and each circuit has a U.S. Court of Appeals that hears appeals from the district courts within its jurisdiction. These circuits help in the administration of justice and ensure that cases are handled efficiently and effectively across the country.

    Rate this question:

  • 12. 

    When parties agree in advance to binding arbitration, the decision of the arbitrator must be followed.

    • A.

      True

    • B.

      False

    Correct Answer
    A. True
    Explanation
    When parties agree in advance to binding arbitration, it means that they have agreed to submit their dispute to an arbitrator and have agreed to be bound by the decision made by the arbitrator. This means that the decision made by the arbitrator is final and must be followed by both parties involved.

    Rate this question:

Quiz Review Timeline +

Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.

  • Current Version
  • Mar 14, 2023
    Quiz Edited by
    ProProfs Editorial Team
  • Nov 20, 2010
    Quiz Created by
    Dixie_King
Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement
×

Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.