Test Your Knowledge About Canadian Politics!

The correct answer is "Guns should be restricted and/or registered." This answer suggests that there should be limitations and regulations on gun ownership in order to ensure public safety. It implies that simply allowing citizens to own guns without any restrictions or registration may pose risks and potential harm. By implementing restrictions and registration, it becomes easier to track and monitor firearms, reducing the likelihood of misuse or illegal activities involving guns.

The given correct answer is "Yes". This suggests that the person believes that the government should step in to stop climate change. They may argue that climate change is a global issue that requires collective action and government intervention to implement policies and regulations that can mitigate its effects. They may also believe that the government has the resources and authority to enforce measures that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainability.

The answer suggests that the rich should be taxed at a higher rate than the poor because they have a higher ability to pay. This is based on the assumption that the rich have more financial resources and can therefore afford to contribute more towards taxes. By implementing a progressive tax system, where the wealthy are taxed at a higher rate, it can help redistribute wealth and provide more resources for social welfare programs and public services, ultimately promoting a more equitable society.

The given answer suggests that the person believes private health care should remain banned. However, without any context or additional information, it is difficult to understand the reasoning behind this belief. It is possible that the person believes private health care can lead to unequal access to healthcare services or that it may prioritize profit over patient care. Without further information, it is not possible to provide a more detailed explanation.

The given answer states that the government needs to be able to take care of its people. This suggests that the government should have a role in providing essential services and support to its citizens. It implies that a large and regulatory government is necessary to ensure the well-being and welfare of the population. This perspective emphasizes the importance of collective responsibility and the need for government intervention to address social issues and provide necessary resources and assistance to those in need.

Based on the given information, Canada should raise taxes to increase services. This means that the government should increase the amount of taxes collected from the citizens in order to provide better and more extensive services to the public. This approach suggests that the government believes that the benefits gained from increasing taxes outweigh the potential negative impact of higher tax rates on individuals and businesses. By raising taxes, the government can generate more revenue to invest in various sectors such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and social welfare, ultimately improving the overall quality of services provided to the Canadian population.

The given answer suggests that the government should take action to address the wealth disparity between the rich and the poor. It argues that it is not fair for some individuals to accumulate vast amounts of wealth while others struggle to make ends meet. By closing this gap, the government can ensure a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities, promoting social and economic justice.

This answer suggests that the person prefers economic equality over economic freedom. Economic equality refers to a state where there is a fair distribution of wealth and resources among all members of society. This preference may stem from the belief that a more equal society leads to better opportunities and outcomes for all individuals, rather than just a select few. It may also indicate a desire to reduce income and wealth disparities and promote social justice.

PM Trudeau had dinner with former President Barack Obama in Montreal.

Free trade can be detrimental to national companies and individuals who lose their jobs because it allows for increased competition from foreign companies. When countries engage in free trade, it often leads to cheaper imports, making it difficult for domestic companies to compete. As a result, these companies may struggle to stay in business or may have to downsize, leading to job losses. Therefore, while free trade may have benefits for the economy and international relationships, it can also have negative consequences for national companies and individuals.