Rework Reuse Remix

Explanation
Project Gutenberg and Creative Commons on Flickr are public domain websites because they provide free access to their content, allowing users to use, share, and modify the materials without any copyright restrictions. These websites aim to promote the availability of knowledge and creativity to the public, making their content a valuable resource for anyone seeking free and legal content. On the other hand, YouTube, Vimeo, and iTunes are not public domain websites as they host copyrighted content and have restrictions on the use and distribution of their materials.

Explanation
The given answer includes various situations that are considered allowable under Fair Use. These include using copyrighted material for schoolwork and education purposes, uploading to YouTube for non-commercial purposes such as news reporting, criticizing or commenting on the material, creating comedy or parody content, and sharing music. These activities are generally considered fair use as they serve educational, informational, or transformative purposes without negatively impacting the market value of the original work.

Explanation
Reworking someone's copyrighted material and using it in a different way is not permissible under copyright law. Copyright grants exclusive rights to the original creator, including the right to control how their work is used, reproduced, or distributed. Without obtaining permission or a license from the copyright holder, it is generally not legal to use or modify their work in any way. Therefore, the statement that it is okay to rework copyrighted material and use it differently is false.

Explanation
Using someone's copyrighted work for profit without obtaining the necessary permissions or licenses is a violation of copyright law. Copyright law grants exclusive rights to the creator of a work, including the right to reproduce, distribute, and profit from their work. Using someone's work without their permission can lead to legal consequences, such as being sued for copyright infringement and having to pay damages. Therefore, it is not okay to use someone's copyrighted work for profit without proper authorization.

Explanation
This statement is incorrect. It is not okay to use someone's copyrighted work without permission, even if the intention is to add new meaning and make it original. Copyright laws protect the originality and ownership of creative works, and using someone's work without permission can lead to legal consequences. It is important to respect and acknowledge the rights of the original creator.

Explanation
Using someone's copyrighted material without permission is generally not okay, regardless of the amount used. The use of copyrighted material without permission is a violation of the owner's exclusive rights, which include the rights to reproduce, distribute, and display their work. Even using a small amount of copyrighted material without permission can still be considered infringement. Therefore, the statement is false.