Please complete this mandatory annual training quiz by Friday, May 7. For helpful hints, visit the IMA SharePoint site and view the powerpoint presentation saved under "Shared Documents."
Patient information in electronic form
Patient information in paper form
Patient information communicated orally
All of the above
Past information
Present information
Past and present information
Present and future information
Past, present and future information
Any situation. They are not allowed.
The sheet requires patients to sign in on the same sheet with their complete name, medical record #, provider they are seeing and reason for visit.
The sign in sheet is covered with one sheet of blank paper and requires first name last initial only.
Patient completes a small slip with full name, time of appointment and provider they are seeing, then drops slip into hanging folder or bin on counter.
None of the above situations violate patient privacy.
Physical health conditions and treatments
Mental health conditions and treatments
Information on payment
Identifying information, including name, phone number, face photo, etc.
All of the above
Law enforcement officials pursuing a criminal investigation, where state laws apply
Telemarketing company surveying cancer rates
Daily newspaper reporters who don’t even know the patient’s name
Development Office to contact Parkinson’s patients for fundraising on behalf of their Neurologist
Any information besides a patient name, address, e-mail, social security number and diagnosis
No information can be disclosed to our Business Associates
The least amount of health information people need to know about patients in order to do their jobs
No. Because she is a health professional, has access to the computerized electronic medical record and it’s her own mother, she would not be breaching confidentiality.
Yes, because she had no need to know under HIPAA. A verbal request to go into someone else’s protected health information, even if they are a relative, if not part of your job, is still a breach.
Name
Former employer
Telephone Number
E-mail address
All of the above
If the patient has been seen by this physician for over a year
If the physician gives the development office a list of all his oncology patients and asks the development office to contact these patients to raise money for MGH’s Oncology Foundation
If the patient signs a written authorization with the physician’s office agreeing to be contacted by the MGH development office for fundraising activities
Any situation. Fundraising efforts are an acceptable disclosure.
No, it is not a violation
Yes, it is a violation and the maximum penalty is a fine up to $50,000
Yes, it is a violation and the penalty is a $100.00 fine per person, per violation
Yes, if your family member told you the neighbor asked him to take in his mail while he was in the hospital for a few days
Yes, if your family member is very close with this neighbor
Yes, if you first ask the patient’s nurse if to check with the patient and see if this was okay with the patient
No, because it is a violation of privacy. The patient may not want your family member to know they have cancer.
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
True.
False
True
False
The physician took proper precautions by drawing the curtain and keeping his voice low. Under HIPAA, James has a legal and ethical obligation to pretend he never heard anything about this patient and to not share this information with anyone.
The physician has violated HIPAA by discussing the patient’s condition where others, including employees without a “need to know,” might hear. Speaking quietly is not enough to ensure patient privacy. He should have moved to a private space before having the discussion.
The physician took proper precautions by drawing the curtain and keeping his voice low. Because he overheard accidentally and the information was not directly shared, James is under no obligation and can tell his son what he has heard.
James has violated HIPAA by not leaving the room when he heard patient information being discussed. Because he does not have a “need to know” to complete his job responsibilities, he should have take precautions to avoid accidentally being exposed to PHI.
Danny should not touch the records. His job does not bring him into contact with PHI, therefore he is not authorized to handle this information. Doing so would be a breach of patient privacy. He has a legal and ethical obligation under HIPAA to pretend he never saw them.
Danny should immediately pick up the records and return them to a supervisor in Health Information Services or the Office of Patient Advocacy. Even though he does not handle PHI as a part of his job, as a hospital employee he is still responsible for safeguarding patient information.
Danny should not touch the records. His job does not bring him into contact with PHI, therefore he is not authorized to handle this information. Doing so would be a breach of patient privacy. He should contact a supervisor at Health Information Services or the Office of Patient Advocacy and report the unattended records.
Danny should immediately pick up the records. Even though he does not usually handle PHI as a part of his job, as a hospital employee he is still responsible for safeguarding patient information. Because he now has the “need to know,” he may look through the records to determine the source and should immediately return them to that department.
Quiz Review Timeline +
Our quizzes are rigorously reviewed, monitored and continuously updated by our expert board to maintain accuracy, relevance, and timeliness.
Wait!
Here's an interesting quiz for you.