Murder Mystery Trivia: Can You Solve These Murder Mysteries?

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Keith Foster
Keith Foster, Quiz Creator
Keith is a dedicated member of, specializing in creating engaging and diverse quizzes. His passion for knowledge and creativity drives him to develop captivating and enjoyable content. Keith's commitment to high-quality standards and innovative ideas ensures his quizzes are informative and entertaining for a wide audience.
Quizzes Created: 1110 | Total Attempts: 2,017,241
Questions: 8 | Viewed: 21,594


A senior police officer asks his junior officers to visit a murder location and note everything they see there. Officers return with the information: Body lying, television on, a cup of tea on the table, newspaper opened with page numbers 7 and 8. Are officers lying?

Answer: Yes, they are lying.
Let's break down the inconsistency:


Newspaper Page Numbers: In a newspaper, when two facing pages are open, an even-numbered page is typically on the left, and an odd-numbered page is on the right.


Officers' Report: The officers reported that the newspaper was opened with page numbers 7 and 8. However, if they had genuinely visited the murder spot and observed the newspaper, it would have been more likely to find page 8 on the left and page 7 on the right.


Inconsistency: The officers' report contradicts the expected arrangement of pages in an opened newspaper, suggesting that they might not have actually visited the murder spot and are providing false information.


Based on this inconsistency, it's reasonable to conclude that the officers are lying about their visit to the murder location. I appreciate your patience and the additional information for clarification.

Police visit a murder spot. There they see a dead body with a bullet shot on the head, and the gun is near the victim's right hand on the floor. There is a tape recorder which police play. It has 10-second audio with crying and then a sound of a gunshot. Is it a murder or a suicide?

Answer: Murder
The key factor that points toward this being a murder rather than a suicide is the behavior of the tape recorder. If the victim had genuinely taken their own life, it would be unlikely for them to be able to stop the recording after the gunshot.


Here's a breakdown of the reasoning:


Audio Recording: The tape recorder contains a 10-second audio recording with crying followed by a gunshot.


Suicide Scenario: If the victim had committed suicide, they wouldn't have been able to stop the recording after the gunshot. In a genuine suicide, the recording would likely continue beyond the moment of the gunshot.


Manipulation and Staging: The fact that the recording stops after the gunshot suggests a deliberate attempt to stage the scene and mislead investigators into believing it was a suicide.


Conclusion: Taking these factors into consideration, it is more plausible that someone else was involved, deliberately manipulating the scene to make it appear as if the victim had taken their own life. Therefore, the conclusion that it's a murder staged to look like suicide is supported by the inconsistency in the behavior of the tape recorder.

For a murder case investigation, police visit a bar. There, the waiter tells the police that the victim was here with his friend. They both drank. Within 10 minutes, the victim managed to drink only one glass of wine. On the other hand, his friend had 5 drinks. It was later revealed that all of those drinks were poisoned. How come did the victim's friend not die, who had 5 drinks within 10 minutes? What do you think was poisoned?

Answer: Ice cubes
Given the scenario, it's highly likely that the ice cubes were poisoned. The victim's friend drank five drinks within 10 minutes, but if the poison was in the ice cubes, it might not have had time to melt and mix with the drinks to the same extent as the victim's one glass of wine. The time it takes for ice to melt and dilute a drink can vary, and the slower consumption rate might have saved the friend from a lethal dose.

A body is lying on the road. It looks clear that the man died after being hit by the car. Is it an intended murder or an accident?

Answer: Not clear
In the given situation, the answer "Not clear" is chosen because the information provided is not sufficient to definitively categorize the incident as either a murder or an accident. While it mentions that a person died after being hit by a car, crucial details that would help make a clear determination are missing. These details might include:Intent of the Driver: Was the driver aware of hitting the person, or was it an unintentional act?Circumstances Leading to the Incident: Understanding why the person was on the road and how the collision occurred can provide more clarity.Behavior of the Driver After the Incident: Did the driver flee the scene or stay to report the incident?Without such details, it remains uncertain whether the incident was a deliberate act (murder) or an unintentional event (accident), leading to the conclusion that it's "Not clear" in this hypothetical scenario.

Around 3 pm, a man died in his own house. The next day, police asked each servant and victim's wife what they were doing when this happened. These were their statements: Gardner: I was watering the plants. Cook: I was making breakfast. Wife: I was watching a movie on my laptop. Who do you think is lying?

Answer: Cook
The murder occurred at 3 pm, and the cook claimed to be making breakfast, it raises suspicion due to the unusual timing for preparing breakfast. This inconsistency suggests that the cook may be lying or providing a misleading statement. In a detective or investigative context, such inconsistencies in alibis or statements can be significant clues that lead to further questioning and examination of the individual's involvement in the incident.

A man's dead body was found hanging inside a room. His feet were four feet above the floor. There was nothing in the room he could have used to climb up and hang himself. There was only a large puddle of water found in the room. Still, the police considered the reason for his death to be a suicide rather than a murder. Was the police right?

Answer: Yes
If there was a block of ice that melted into a large puddle of water, it could indeed explain how the man was able to hang himself without anything in the room to climb up on. In such a scenario, the ice block could have initially provided the necessary height, and as it melted, the man's feet ended up four feet above the floor. Given this clarification, the conclusion of suicide makes sense, and the police may have been correct in their assessment, taking into account the unique method used. 

A lady was murdered on the road. Police suspected the lady's husband, brother, and father to be the murderer. They sent a message to all three something like this: "Your wife/sister/daughter is murdered. Please come to the crime spot." Only the husband reached there. Who is the murderer?

Answer: Husband
The husband reaching the crime spot without the message specifying the location adds a layer of suspicion. Here's a more detailed explanation:Message Ambiguity: The message sent to the husband, brother, and father didn't specify the location of the murder. This means that they all received a general notification about the crime but without details on where it occurred.Husband's Specific Arrival: Despite the lack of location details, only the husband managed to reach the exact crime spot. His ability to pinpoint the location raises questions about how he knew where the murder took place.Possible Involvement: The specific arrival of the husband could suggest that he had prior knowledge of the crime scene, potentially indicating his involvement in the murder. If he didn't have information about the location through official channels, his ability to reach the crime spot becomes more suspicious.In light of these observations, it becomes reasonable to consider the husband as a prime suspect in the murder case. The message's ambiguity and his specific arrival create a connection that warrants further investigation into his possible role in the crime.

A man was murdered inside his own house. Police asked the maid and the man's wife about where they were when this happened. The wife said she had gone to the market. The maid said she was not well and that is why she didn't come for the job that day. Who is lying?

Answer: It can't be said.
Given the information provided, it is not possible to definitively determine who is lying. Both the wife and the maid have provided alibis, and without additional evidence or context, it cannot be conclusively stated whether either of them is telling the truth or lying. Therefore, the correct answer is "It can't be said."
Back to Top Back to top

Here's an interesting quiz for you.

We have other quizzes matching your interest.