The Great Canadian Law Challenge

Approved & Edited by ProProfs Editorial Team
The editorial team at ProProfs Quizzes consists of a select group of subject experts, trivia writers, and quiz masters who have authored over 10,000 quizzes taken by more than 100 million users. This team includes our in-house seasoned quiz moderators and subject matter experts. Our editorial experts, spread across the world, are rigorously trained using our comprehensive guidelines to ensure that you receive the highest quality quizzes.
Learn about Our Editorial Process
| By Bernarm
B
Bernarm
Community Contributor
Quizzes Created: 2 | Total Attempts: 462
Questions: 10 | Attempts: 87

SettingsSettingsSettings
The Great Canadian Law Challenge - Quiz

Lester B. Pearson C. H. S.
Open House, 2015


Questions and Answers
  • 1. 

    In Ontario, how old must you be to be married without parental or the court’s permission?

    • A.

      18

    • B.

      16

    • C.

      19

    • D.

      21

    Correct Answer
    A. 18
    Explanation
    In Ontario, individuals must be 18 years old to be married without parental or the court's permission. This means that they are considered legally able to enter into marriage without needing the consent or approval of their parents or the court.

    Rate this question:

  • 2. 

    Who cannot be charged with conspiracy together?

    • A.

      A husband and wife

    • B.

      A parent and child

    • C.

      A priest and a nun

    • D.

      A patient and doctor

    Correct Answer
    A. A husband and wife
    Explanation
    A husband and wife cannot be charged with conspiracy together because they are considered to be one legal entity in many jurisdictions. This is based on the legal principle of marital unity, which assumes that the interests and actions of spouses are aligned. Therefore, they are seen as incapable of conspiring with each other as they share a legal and financial bond.

    Rate this question:

  • 3. 

    Which of the following must the Crown normally prove in order for an accused to be guilty?

    • A.

      Intent to commit the crime

    • B.

      Motive for committing the crime

    • C.

      Knowledge the act was illegal

    • D.

      Financial or personal benefit from the crime

    Correct Answer
    A. Intent to commit the crime
    Explanation
    In order for an accused to be guilty, the Crown must normally prove the intent to commit the crime. Intent refers to the state of mind of the accused, showing that they had a purpose or desire to commit the crime. It is an essential element of most criminal offenses as it demonstrates the accused's culpability and willingness to engage in the illegal act. Motive, knowledge of the act's illegality, and financial or personal benefit from the crime may be relevant factors in a case, but they are not always necessary to prove guilt.

    Rate this question:

  • 4. 

    About what percentage of inmates are in prison for the second or more time?

    • A.

      75%

    • B.

      50%

    • C.

      90%

    • D.

      35%

    Correct Answer
    A. 75%
    Explanation
    Approximately 75% of inmates are in prison for the second or more time. This suggests that a significant majority of prisoners have been incarcerated before, indicating a high rate of recidivism. This could be due to various factors such as a lack of rehabilitation programs, limited access to education and job opportunities, or underlying social and economic issues that contribute to a cycle of criminal behavior.

    Rate this question:

  • 5. 

    The difference between murder and manslaughter is:

    • A.

      Murder requires intent, manslaughter does not

    • B.

      Murder requires motive, manslaughter does not

    • C.

      Murder is normally violent, manslaughter is not

    • D.

      Transferred malice cannot apply to manslaughter

    Correct Answer
    A. Murder requires intent, manslaughter does not
    Explanation
    The key difference between murder and manslaughter is the presence of intent. Murder is the intentional killing of another person, where the perpetrator has the specific purpose or desire to cause the death. On the other hand, manslaughter refers to the unlawful killing of another person without the intention to cause death, typically resulting from recklessness or negligence. Therefore, while murder necessitates intent, manslaughter does not require the same level of intention.

    Rate this question:

  • 6. 

    When is a person in Ontario who is under the age of 19 legally allowed to drink?

    • A.

      When in a private home, accompanied by his/her own parent(s)

    • B.

      Anywhere, as long as the alcohol was purchased by his/her own parent(s)

    • C.

      At a house party where at least one person is 19 years old

    • D.

      It is never legally permitted

    Correct Answer
    A. When in a private home, accompanied by his/her own parent(s)
    Explanation
    In Ontario, a person who is under the age of 19 is legally allowed to drink when they are in a private home and accompanied by their own parent(s). This means that as long as the person is in a private residence and their parent(s) are present, they are legally permitted to consume alcohol. However, it is important to note that this exception only applies to private homes and does not extend to other locations or situations.

    Rate this question:

  • 7. 

    Which of the following are part of the Civil law system?Check all that apply.

    • A.

      Family Law

    • B.

      Tort Law

    • C.

      Real Estate Law

    • D.

      Driving Law

    • E.

      Gambling Law

    Correct Answer(s)
    A. Family Law
    B. Tort Law
    C. Real Estate Law
    Explanation
    The Civil law system includes Family Law, Tort Law, and Real Estate Law. Family Law deals with legal issues related to marriage, divorce, child custody, and adoption. Tort Law focuses on civil wrongs or injuries caused by one party to another, such as personal injury or property damage. Real Estate Law governs the ownership, use, and transfer of real property. Therefore, these three areas are part of the Civil law system. Driving Law and Gambling Law are not specifically mentioned as part of the Civil law system in the given options.

    Rate this question:

  • 8. 

    The police must take two breathalyzer samples when they suspect a person of impaired driving. How long must the police wait between taking the two samples?

    • A.

      15 minutes

    • B.

      5 minutes

    • C.

      10 minutes

    • D.

      30 minutes

    Correct Answer
    A. 15 minutes
    Explanation
    The police must wait for 15 minutes between taking the two breathalyzer samples when they suspect a person of impaired driving. This waiting period is necessary to ensure accurate and reliable results. It allows for any residual alcohol in the mouth to dissipate, preventing the possibility of a false positive reading. Additionally, waiting for 15 minutes helps to ensure that the second sample is not contaminated by the first sample, providing a more accurate assessment of the individual's blood alcohol concentration.

    Rate this question:

  • 9. 

    What is the minimum sentence for manslaughter?

    • A.

      There is no minimum

    • B.

      Life in prison, no parole for 10 years

    • C.

      Life in prison, no parole for 25 years

    • D.

      Life in prison, no parole ever

    Correct Answer
    A. There is no minimum
    Explanation
    The correct answer is that there is no minimum sentence for manslaughter. This means that the judge has the discretion to determine the appropriate sentence based on the circumstances of the case. While there may be guidelines or recommendations, there is no set minimum sentence that must be imposed for this crime.

    Rate this question:

  • 10. 

    What happens during a voir dire?

    • A.

      The judge decides if evidence is valid

    • B.

      An accused is sentenced

    • C.

      A plea bargain is made

    • D.

      The lawyers ask witnesses questions

    Correct Answer
    A. The judge decides if evidence is valid
    Explanation
    During a voir dire, the judge evaluates the admissibility and validity of evidence. This process involves questioning potential jurors to determine their suitability for the trial. The judge assesses the relevance and credibility of evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense, ensuring that only admissible evidence is considered. The judge's role is crucial in maintaining a fair and impartial trial by eliminating any evidence that may be prejudicial or unreliable.

    Rate this question:

Back to Top Back to top
Advertisement