Iraq War Quiz 2011 Roper
Use your notes to take the quiz on the Iraq War. Best of luck.
Questions and Answers
- 1.
Which group did Bush say was responsible for the 9/11 attacks?
- A.
Al-Qaeda
- B.
Al-Faeda
- C.
The Bush administration itself
- D.
The Department of Defense
Correct Answer
A. Al-QaedaExplanation
In this question, the correct answer is Al-Qaeda. This is because Al-Qaeda is a known terrorist organization that claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. The question is asking which group Bush specifically mentioned as being responsible, and Al-Qaeda is the accurate answer in this context.Rate this question:
-
- 2.
Who approved the war in Iraq?
- A.
Congress
- B.
The Supreme Court
- C.
The Judicial Branch
- D.
The Obama Administration
Correct Answer
A. CongressExplanation
Congress approved the war in Iraq. As the legislative branch of the US government, Congress has the power to declare war. In 2002, they passed a resolution called the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, which authorized the use of military force against Iraq. This resolution gave President George W. Bush the authority to invade Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power. Therefore, it was Congress, not the Supreme Court, the Judicial Branch, or the Obama Administration, who approved the war in Iraq.Rate this question:
-
- 3.
Donald Rumsfeld said that Iraq was...
- A.
Producing weapons of mass destruction.
- B.
The greatest country in the world.
- C.
The country that planned 9/11.
- D.
The boogie man.
Correct Answer
A. Producing weapons of mass destruction.Explanation
Donald Rumsfeld, a former U.S. Secretary of Defense, claimed that Iraq was producing weapons of mass destruction. This statement refers to the belief held by the U.S. government during the early 2000s that Iraq possessed and was actively developing weapons capable of causing widespread destruction, such as nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. This belief was one of the justifications used to justify the invasion of Iraq in 2003. However, after the invasion, no such weapons were found, leading to significant controversy and criticism of the intelligence used to support this claim.Rate this question:
-
- 4.
Why did the US invade Iraq in the first place?
- A.
Bush thought they were producing weapons of mass destruction.
- B.
Bush thought they attacked the world trade center.
- C.
They invaded US first.
Correct Answer
A. Bush thought they were producing weapons of mass destruction.Explanation
The correct answer is that Bush thought Iraq was producing weapons of mass destruction. This explanation suggests that the main reason for the US invasion of Iraq was the belief that Iraq possessed and was actively producing weapons of mass destruction. This belief was a major justification used by the Bush administration to gain public support for the invasion. However, after the invasion, no such weapons were found, leading to significant controversy and criticism of the decision to invade.Rate this question:
-
- 5.
Later on, did anyone end up finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
- A.
Yes
- B.
No
Correct Answer
B. NoExplanation
No, no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. This statement refers to the search for weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that was conducted in Iraq after the United States-led invasion in 2003. Despite the initial claims that Iraq possessed WMDs, no concrete evidence was found to support these claims. The lack of discovery of WMDs in Iraq has been widely debated and criticized, leading to significant political and diplomatic consequences.Rate this question:
-
- 6.
Who led Iraq before the war?
- A.
Osama Bin-Laden
- B.
George Bush
- C.
Barack Obama
- D.
Sadam Hussien
Correct Answer
D. Sadam HussienExplanation
Saddam Hussein led Iraq before the war. He served as the President of Iraq from 1979 until his overthrow in 2003. Saddam Hussein was known for his authoritarian rule and involvement in numerous human rights abuses. His leadership was marked by conflicts with neighboring countries, including the Iran-Iraq War and the Gulf War. The United States-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 eventually led to his capture and execution.Rate this question:
-
- 7.
When was the former leader of Iraq executed?
- A.
2003
- B.
2004
- C.
2005
- D.
2006
Correct Answer
D. 2006Explanation
In 2006, the former leader of Iraq was executed.Rate this question:
-
- 8.
When did live coverage of wars begin?
- A.
During World War One
- B.
During World War Two
- C.
During the Viet Nam War
- D.
During the Iraq War
Correct Answer
C. During the Viet Nam War -
- 9.
Why did media coverage make Americans oppose the war?
- A.
It showed the real destruction of war.
- B.
It showed our brave soldiers conquering foreign lands.
- C.
It glorified war.
- D.
It made the war seem like it was worth fighting.
Correct Answer
A. It showed the real destruction of war.Explanation
The media coverage made Americans oppose the war because it showed the real destruction of war. By highlighting the true consequences and devastation caused by warfare, the media portrayed a more realistic and unglamorous view of the conflict. This likely led to a shift in public opinion, as people became more aware of the human cost and negative impact of the war.Rate this question:
-
- 10.
What is bias?
- A.
Something that cannot be disputed.
- B.
Letting perceptions lead your views.
- C.
An opinion.
Correct Answer(s)
B. Letting perceptions lead your views.
C. An opinion.Explanation
Bias refers to the tendency of letting one's perceptions and preconceived notions influence their views and judgments. It involves favoring or being inclined towards a particular perspective or opinion without considering objective evidence or alternative viewpoints. Therefore, the answer "Letting perceptions lead your views" accurately captures the concept of bias. Additionally, bias can also be understood as an opinion, as it reflects a subjective viewpoint that may not be based on objective facts or rational analysis.Rate this question:
-
- 11.
What is Abu Ghraib?
- A.
A resort town in the Middle East.
- B.
A prison in Iraq.
- C.
The leader of the Taliban
Correct Answer
B. A prison in Iraq.Explanation
Abu Ghraib is a prison in Iraq. It gained international attention in 2004 when reports and photographs surfaced depicting the abuse and torture of prisoners by US military personnel. The scandal raised serious concerns about human rights violations and sparked a global debate on the treatment of prisoners in war zones. The name Abu Ghraib has become synonymous with the abuse of power and the violation of human rights.Rate this question:
-
- 12.
What did Donald Rumsfeld do in December of 2002?
- A.
Declare war on Iraq.
- B.
Establish a CIA team to find WMDs in Iraq.
- C.
Approve harsher interrogation techniques.
Correct Answer
C. Approve harsher interrogation techniques.Explanation
In December of 2002, Donald Rumsfeld approved harsher interrogation techniques. This suggests that he gave his authorization or consent for the use of more severe methods during interrogations. This action indicates that Rumsfeld played a role in the decision-making process regarding the treatment of detainees and the use of enhanced interrogation techniques.Rate this question:
-
- 13.
In 2004 stories of torture and inhumane photographs are leaked to the media. Who was blamed?
- A.
Low ranking prison staff.
- B.
The Bush Administration.
Correct Answer
A. Low ranking prison staff.Explanation
In 2004, when stories of torture and inhumane photographs were leaked to the media, the blame was placed on low ranking prison staff. This suggests that those directly involved in the incidents were held responsible for their actions, rather than the Bush Administration being held accountable for the systemic issues that allowed such behavior to occur.Rate this question:
-
- 14.
What is media bias?
- A.
The idea that the media gives all the facts.
- B.
The idea that the media gives only the facts that support its argument
Correct Answer
B. The idea that the media gives only the facts that support its argumentExplanation
Media bias refers to the idea that the media selectively presents information and news stories in a way that supports a particular argument or viewpoint. This means that the media may choose to highlight certain facts that align with their agenda while ignoring or downplaying others that may contradict it. This bias can influence public opinion and shape the narrative around certain issues or events.Rate this question:
-
- 15.
Why was the media criticized for coverage of the War in Iraq?
- A.
Because it did an amazing job.
- B.
Because it didn't ask enough tough question.
- C.
Because the media talked to everyone involved with the war.
Correct Answer
B. Because it didn't ask enough tough question.Explanation
The media was criticized for its coverage of the War in Iraq because it did not ask enough tough questions. This suggests that the media failed to hold those involved in the war accountable and did not thoroughly investigate and challenge the actions and motives of the parties involved. The lack of tough questioning may have resulted in a lack of transparency and objective reporting, which led to criticism from the public and other observers.Rate this question:
-
Back to top